Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dbelov275

The Difference Between Regulation A+ and CF Crowdfunding.

Recommended Posts

There are three different types of equity crowdfunding offered under the JOBS Act:

Accredited Crowdfunding - Regulation D (made possible by Title II)

Crowdfunding Plus, Title IV/Regulation A+ (“Reg. A+”)

Retail Crowdfunding, Title III/Regulation Crowdfunding (“Reg. CF”)

These are the types of equity crowdfunding but we will be discussing the major difference between Crowdfunding plus, Title IV/Regulation A+ and Retail Crowdfunding, Title III/Regulation Crowdfunding.

Actually, these two are pretty much similar to each other because for the most part they do the exact same thing. The regulation A+ allows entrepreneurs raise up to 50million dollars a year from non-accredit and accredit investors alike, but it does require the prior authorization of the SAC before a company can begin selling shares and collecting cash. While the Retail Crowdfunding, Title III/Regulation Crowdfunding is only allowed to raise up to a million dollars a year and does not require the prior authorization of the SAC before a company can begin selling shares and collecting cash.

This is the major different between the two. hope this helps someone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howbeit the difference between these two, I don't think Title IV (Regulation A+) and Title III (Regulation CF) of the JOBS Act should be competing to determine which is better. Both are designed to serve two different audiences and as such will be best suited for different companies at different stages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are right. In that regards, here are some few common advantages of both of them

Founders set terms

Founders set value of company

Founders set number and price of shares

Founders set minimum investment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes you are right. In that regards, here are some few common advantages of both of them

Founders set terms

Founders set value of company

Founders set number and price of shares

Founders set minimum investment

 

I wonder what are their disadvantages then? For example, I've heard there are certain problems concerning lack of liquidity, and some consider restrictions are too tight. Could you delve deeper into the topic? I know it's probably some basic information, but I thought I'd ask you since you seem versed in the issue:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.