Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mkp14

ER2 TTM_5014_Slingshot

Recommended Posts

Nice clean chart Mkp... can you tell exactly all indicators and inputs? please keep posting, this is a very nice argument to work on,posting will help you a lot and we will keep interacting.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walterw

Thx for reply

Here is exeplation of all Indicators on 55tick chart

 

1. TTM Trend.ELD

2. EMA (21)

3. EMA 8

4. EMA 200

 

Subgraph 2

 

1. 500cci.ELD ( By Walterw)

2. Added 14cci on top of it

 

Subgraph 3

5.2.2 (h+l+c) Stochastics slow

21.14.7 (h+l+c) Stochastics slow

 

mkp14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Hi Walterw

Thx for reply

Here is exeplation of all Indicators on 55tick chart

 

1. TTM Trend.ELD

2. EMA (21)

3. EMA 8

4. EMA 200

 

Subgraph 2

 

1. 500cci.ELD ( By Walterw)

2. Added 14cci on top of it

 

Subgraph 3

5.2.2 (h+l+c) Stochastics slow

21.14.7 (h+l+c) Stochastics slow

 

mkp14

 

Interesting chart.

 

Just curious, though. What's the purpose of the 200EMA on your chart for? Maybe a 50EMA might be more useful here (seeing that you've got a 50 cci on there)...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting chart.

 

Just curious, though. What's the purpose of the 200EMA on your chart for? Maybe a 50EMA might be more useful here (seeing that you've got a 50 cci on there)...

 

HI Cooter, obviously we will see his reply on this.... my opinion on that 200 ema is that it helps to show the overall larger trend plus a clear reading of momentum as his smaller emas are quite far from ema 200... wich suggests the market its trending.... if his small emas get to near the 200 ema we know market is sleeping....

 

mkp : you said cci is on input 500... seems is set to 50 is it ? wich would be more logic on 55T... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to help mkp... now tell me, what would be the exact entry criteria there, wich indicator will be king to give you the entry...? I like your stoch crossing back up that 20 line... at least on this ocassion...

er2m7_test3.png.64d989d973a7bf367a841dae45cf1421.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walterw

Thx for keep in touch. I have tried 5014 50zlr and 20 schos cross so far 5014 give me let entry does not give me enough room for stop while 20cross worked out good and now I am testing 5014 cross at -50 line not zero and also +- 100 line on cci is major support and resistance in chart both trade has -100 support and 14cci bounce at

-100 and as soon as cross -50 I enter and it is also conform by 20 sch cross. This I learn from your post of M phenomena to enter at top of M not cross at middle of M so it gives more room for stop.Thx for everything so helpful.

thx

Mkp14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walterw

Because it gave me 3 clue

1. trade change short time that was 2nd high

2. Slingshot in 50cci

3. Slingshot in ss

 

Now 3rd trade coming

thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walterw

3rd One is MOF (Money on Floor) When both longer and shorter term ss cross to gather it is possible trend reversal and i took it and it was conform by 133t chart

Mkp14

ER2H7-0053.thumb.png.781de89f01a5a41289cd6bbc2fcb43e6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mkp14

 

Looking for confirmation signal from two momentum indicators on your 55t chart seems unreasonable for me. They repeat themselves and you probably need something with different nature.

The TTM and moving averages combo also have similar value as a trend definition. Removing the lines and using any kind of channel will bring a visual clue for the key area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walterw

Yes I would take this short Why?

1.Slingshot

2.50cci Fail to cross -100

3.As You say distance and slope of 21ema

4. See how many time 50cci in red zonel and 14cci bounce fron zero(zlr)

Thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

I re read original document wrote by Buffy and Jimmer about slingshot setup and I made replica of his thought and here is the result. Please give suggestion and improvement as especially from walterw. Whole day today bline never give long setup.

Thx

Mkp14

ER2H7-0061.png.1c35e7817caf42fac4f78cf88913a5a0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.