Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

CR7_Freak

Is Bitcoin a Better Investment Than Gold?

Recommended Posts

freak,

 

That is the best Forex article ever published on TL. Thanks a lot.

 

actually neither gold nor btc are investment vehicles...

 

as trades

bitcoin is easier... btc is essentially a digital bearer bond.

over the next few years - btc has more upside potential in terms of USD - and also way more downside potential

ie btc offers a better variance trading opportunity... gold offers a better safety opportunity.

 

jmo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Functions of money:

 

1. Medium of exchange;

2. Unit of account: Money is the common standard for measuring relative worth of goods and service;

3. Store of value.

 

Through history, several forms of currency were used (salt, rocks, shells, etc.), but only silver and gold were able to simultaneously and for long periods of time perform the function number 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(first - reiterating that gold is not an investment...

and that bitcoin is a trade not an investment - unless you're mining properly,

etc, etc etc)

 

... anyways, here's an interesting consumer level tube re btc (best run at 1.5 speed btw)

 

https://youtu.be/91oot6hKbx4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We can conclude some better answer to this question : "Is Bitcoin a Better Investment Than Gold?" if we go through the past five year charts of both these commodities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We can conclude some better answer to this question : "Is Bitcoin a Better Investment Than Gold?" if we go through the past five year charts of both these commodities.

 

aim, if you parrot fake narratives you most likely believe false narratives... (just sayin...)

Again - Neither one of them has been a "investment"... ie

 

I "go through" the charts and still conclude that btc has been a better trading instrument than gold over the "past five years"... not a better "investment". Neither one of them has been a fkn "investment"...

 

otoh, folks

aimhi er and Buy

BuyBy

 

btw

 

Cryptocurrencies do not have ANY limits on supply.

 

...

 

The individual chain's are not secure.

The chain's are not unhackable.

...

and ... btc,etc is easier to manipulate than the yen, or yuan, or dollar, or peso, or pound

 

etc... ie

they (all) become cryto's

 

so far for me the best play is trade old crypto's (before they (all) become cryto's)

for new crypto's ...

 

Can Social media for3cast the foochur ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aim, if you parrot fake narratives you most likely believe false narratives... (just sayin...)

Again - Neither one of them has been a "investment"... ie

 

I "go through" the charts and still conclude that btc has been a better trading instrument than gold over the "past five years"... not a better "investment". Neither one of them has been a fkn "investment"...

 

otoh, folks

aimhi er and Buy

BuyBy

 

btw

 

Cryptocurrencies do not have ANY limits on supply.

 

...

 

The individual chain's are not secure.

The chain's are not unhackable.

...

and ... btc,etc is easier to manipulate than the yen, or yuan, or dollar, or peso, or pound

 

etc... ie

they (all) become cryto's

 

so far for me the best play is trade old crypto's (before they (all) become cryto's)

for new crypto's ...

 

Can Social media for3cast the foochur ?

 

 

Looool man any HYIP or cryptobubble overshadows traditional regulated instruments in terms of return. The point is they can't be considered instruments because using it to make a killing shot to your head has absolutely no sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looool man any HYIP or cryptobubble overshadows traditional regulated instruments in terms of return. The point is they can't be considered instruments because using it to make a killing shot to your head has absolutely no sense.

 

fxe, you're making less sense than zdo... got a few minutes to rephrase that jewel of a post?

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fxe, you're making less sense than zdo... got a few minutes to rephrase that jewel of a post?

:)

 

Yeah I sure :)

 

What I mean is

 

there is a big pitfall when seeing monthly return is 20, 30 100%, people stubbornly don't want to take into consideration risk. We are all doomed to fight with our installed by default light-headedness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What I mean is

 

there is a big pitfall when seeing monthly return is 20, 30 100%, people stubbornly don't want to take into consideration risk. We are all doomed to fight with our installed by default light-headedness.

 

bad class project...

 

A trader’s cryptocurrency portf. is up over 1200 % this year to date. It’s unleveraged.

 

His automated FX trading is up 60% this year to date. It’s leveraged 50:1. Margin used for the account this year has run from 0.5 to 16% of NAV .

 

Capital gains are the primary goals of these accounts ie

Safety and security goals are relatively low for both ‘accounts’ ie willing to lose it all in the crypto trading... and willing to lose 60% of capital in FX trading

 

Which was the better ‘trade’ ?

 

If you were starting up, how would you allocate your capital between these two ‘trades’ ?

 

What critical information was not discussed in the above cases?

 

CryptoCurrencyChart - Custom Chart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bad class project...

 

A trader’s cryptocurrency portf. is up over 1200 % this year to date. It’s unleveraged.

 

His automated FX trading is up 60% this year to date. It’s leveraged 50:1. Margin used for the account this year has run from 0.5 to 16% of NAV .

 

Capital gains are the primary goals of these accounts ie

Safety and security goals are relatively low for both ‘accounts’ ie willing to lose it all in the crypto trading... and willing to lose 60% of capital in FX trading

 

Which was the better ‘trade’ ?

 

If you were starting up, how would you allocate your capital between these two ‘trades’ ?

 

What critical information was not discussed in the above cases?

 

CryptoCurrencyChart - Custom Chart

 

 

And again...

 

1200%, 10000% 100K% profit on portfolio this year, this all like winning a lottery. He just caught the wave. That's it. What I mean this portfolio gains was single experiment carried out which you can't repeat (so measure statistically) to say what is his results on distance. Building serious portfolio solely on people rush and greed is crazy.

 

With same success..

 

Parse information on all High Yield Investment programs (HYIPS), build distribution find average of their life (10, 20 30 days) and you can consider it similar investment opportunity. Its also built solely on people interest to become rich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the thread starter might have got his answer and hats off to those who bought bitcoin in the last few months as it is around 7000usd now. I am also trading in on my hotforex broker and i am in profit on my longs, i didn't shorted it because i think it still have a bullish pattern and we can go further on long terms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It’s often worthwhile to look at things from an ‘energy’ (cost) perspective ...

 

https://srsroccoreport.com/bitcoin-vs-gold-which-ones-a-bubble-how-much-energy-do-they-really-consume/

 

Especially when in Russia 1 KWt costs around 1 cent. And its tariffs for citizen for factories it's even cheaper.

 

Maintaining bitcoin facilities or mining is not a problem from the standpoint of energy costs. At least till we have coal electricity stations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my opinion mining is not any feasible option these days however we better can earn good returns on our investment by trading bitcoins against USD or EUR.

 

Could you suggest any brokers that accept bitcoin deposits and offer mirror contracts on BTCUSD (no actual bitcoin holdings).

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.