Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

We Probably Are Finishing The Last Bullish Impulse. I Dont Really Know But, Seeing The Charts We Could Not Go Much Futher Than Todays Highs Before Seeing A Big Retracement.

 

I Attach 2 Es Charts 15 And 60 Minutes.

 

P.d. Brownsfan. Because You Asked Me Which My Position Was And I Told You. I Tell You Now That I Have Closed My Longs Right At This Time. Hope It Is Useful For You To Know.

5aa70dd8ae345_HIGHS1.thumb.png.67b500c81cfc35d348daa9641ac815e7.png

5aa70dd8b7a11_HIGHS2.thumb.png.294c0f5d61212310c15cb60678976e55.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mal - the spinning top you have labeled as a shooting star does not necessarily signify the end of the up move. Your candle preceding this shooting star is also a high volume spinning top as well. So you have 2 back-to-back high volume spinning tops on a 60 min chart. One could argue that the spinning top, like a doji, symbolizes an equilibrium in the market, not signifying the end of the current trend. Had you shorted the initial high volume spinning top, there's a good chance your stop was taken out on the next high volume spinning top. And as of the time of your screen shot, you have a bullish hammer as well.

 

Some food for thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the hourly charts we've seen all sorts of bearish candlesticks on the way up but none of them have been the top. I think we'll see a very bearish candlestick or pattern on the daily charts before any pullback begins. I wouldn't read too much into the hourlies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ES & YM moving in tandem.

 

ER2 & NQ moving in tandem.

 

No more taking your YM & ES trades off ER2 and NQ data for relationship for the time being.

 

I noticed this a couple of days ago.

18may07.thumb.jpg.d27f26f3b4b6aae27dc5c612cd2df0c4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

brownsfan,

 

I would like you to give me and explain in more detail spinnings and volume bars relationships with charts please. I dont know too much about these interactions. specially about what you say of the equilibrium market please

 

thanks MX

 

notouch,

 

I know there is a possibility to keep growing still, but I trade the dax (a very, very volatil index) so, having the weekend coming, a war running and oil prices growing, Im scared of having a big downward gap in dax monday morning. this wave is getting to its end, there is, probably, some extensions of this wave to come but, I dont like to run my longs to the top end just in case anything happens. there is also another possibility that we are in wave 3 still of 5 and there is a bullish run to come but it's scary.

 

thanks for the comment

 

wsam,

 

I dont understand what you really try to explain. Im not from the states and have some english language limitations.

 

thank you

 

I attach two dax charts because of I have a big doubt about the last elliott wave counting. each chart is a different scenario fot the next days. I would be very greatful if some ellotticyan with experience could bring me some light to my doubts. it can be also useful for those traders who hold long positions still.

 

thank you all again. it seems we are starting to understand to each other. the beginning was a little difficult and agressive in the texting but, now starts to be softer and these comments can be very useful for all of us and economically good for our trading accounts in the future. sharing different visions of whats going on in the markets make us think different views and being much more aware of changes and trends

5aa70dd8f1d20_RUNNING1.thumb.png.35f906201356c4a7e2fb461ff8ca143f.png

5aa70dd90723d_RUNNING2.thumb.png.03434029f3d69daf891331e78fc6e2ce.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  malvado xetra said:
brownsfan,

 

I would like you to give me and explain in more detail spinnings and volume bars relationships with charts please. I dont know too much about these interactions. specially about what you say of the equilibrium market please

 

thanks MX

 

notouch,

 

I know there is a possibility to keep growing still, but I trade the dax (a very, very volatil index) so, having the weekend coming, a war running and oil prices growing, Im scared of having a big downward gap in dax monday morning. this wave is getting to its end, there is, probably, some extensions of this wave to come but, I dont like to run my longs to the top end just in case anything happens. there is also another possibility that we are in wave 3 still of 5 and there is a bullish run to come but it's scary.

 

thanks for the comment

 

wsam,

 

I dont understand what you really try to explain. Im not from the states and have some english language limitations.

 

thank you

 

I attach two dax charts because of I have a big doubt about the last elliott wave counting. each chart is a different scenario fot the next days. I would be very greatful if some ellotticyan with experience could bring me some light to my doubts. it can be also useful for those traders who hold long positions still.

 

thank you all again. it seems we are starting to understand to each other. the beginning was a little difficult and agressive in the texting but, now starts to be softer and these comments can be very useful for all of us and economically good for our trading accounts in the future. sharing different visions of whats going on in the markets make us think different views and being much more aware of changes and trends

 

 

Hi Malvado, I am glad we interact in a civilized technicall realm, sometimes "maybe" the semantics can sugest some rudness but here at TL we are very franc on our opinion and try to make it constructive....

 

I have one doubt on the first chart where you count with the red lines the wave 3 doesnt take the high of wave 2... wich is I think incorrect... to validate a wave, it should swing the previous ending pivot of prior wave... I attach what I believe would be the overall count if we have to swing the first wave 1.... please tell me what you think, I am not elliotican, did take course from elliotwave.com some years ago.... cheers Walter.

elliot.thumb.png.1fdb27e55e9e538699df80866f29ee21.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Point Walter,

 

Your Vision Made To Repass The Elliott Rule. I Thought Wave 3 Had To Be At Least As The Top Of Wave 2. But, I Was Wrong. Elliott Rule Says That Wave 3 Must Always Overpass Top Of Wave 2 And With An Usual Length 161.8% Minimum Of Length Wave 1. So My First Vision Of The Chart Was Incorrect.

 

Only, Your Chart Or My Second Chart Can Be Correct. Noutouch And Brownsfan Were Right Thinking About The Continuation Of The Present Short Term Trend. Anyway, It Doesnt Matter Which Chart We Choose Betwen Yours Or My Second Because The Conclusion Of Both Are The Same: We Are In Wave 3. So, There Are A Lot Of Possibilities Of Keeping Growing. Considering Both Charts, Both Have Complex Corrections. This Means That The Next Retracement To Correct Wave 3 Will Be Simple To Keep Alternation But A Large Retracement To Keep Same Proportion Of The First Retracement.

 

Basing A Study On Your Chart, I Have Enhanced A Projection Of A Possible Next Future For The Following Days. Market Is Still Bullish But We Have To Be Aware Of Next Abc Keeping An Eye To Make Sure Is An Abc And Wait The End Of This Abc Looking For A Support Line, Bullish Candle, Big Volume Bar, Etc.

 

This Last Coment Would Be My Long Enter Criteria Once The Next Abc Finishes.

 

It Is A Pleassure For Me To Keep In Touch With You. You Are Quite Open Minded And Observant And This Is Very Constructive Because Make Us Consider A Wider Range Of Scenarios.

 

Thanks Walter

 

Hope You Enjoy The Chart I Think Is Quite Detailed And Helpful. To Have In Mind Where We Are And What Can Come First (the Big Picture) Is Very Important To Develop A Strategy And Be Aware And Sure For The Next Entries

5aa70dd932cb1_RUNNING3.thumb.png.4e68129216cfecc59d30a4f6e3a9d1fc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

malvado - sorry dude. What I was trying to explain from my observations, you know how some people say "X" market leads and "Y' market usually follows.

 

Well today, the ER2 and NQ both had some of a gap fill while the YM and ES did not and could not break their 30 minute low.

 

Its these little things that make the difference and this is to help newer traders who have heard of the "myth" that ER2 usually leads and the rest follows, etc.

 

Just be aware of how all four are trading. That's all I was trying to say. It actually helps if you use TS to insert the symbols in one chart, that way you get a direct comparison.

 

Here's another example with ES and $TICK on the same chart, notice the TICK lows and highs and how they correspond to ES lows and highs?

18may07.jpg.d68da3740872475f10051362a16e7426.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  malvado xetra said:
Good Point Walter,

 

Your Vision Made To Repass The Elliott Rule. I Thought Wave 3 Had To Be At Least As The Top Of Wave 2. But, I Was Wrong. Elliott Rule Says That Wave 3 Must Always Overpass Top Of Wave 2 And With An Usual Length 161.8% Minimum Of Length Wave 1. So My First Vision Of The Chart Was Incorrect.

 

Only, Your Chart Or My Second Chart Can Be Correct. Noutouch And Brownsfan Were Right Thinking About The Continuation Of The Present Short Term Trend. Anyway, It Doesnt Matter Which Chart We Choose Betwen Yours Or My Second Because The Conclusion Of Both Are The Same: We Are In Wave 3. So, There Are A Lot Of Possibilities Of Keeping Growing. Considering Both Charts, Both Have Complex Corrections. This Means That The Next Retracement To Correct Wave 3 Will Be Simple To Keep Alternation But A Large Retracement To Keep Same Proportion Of The First Retracement.

 

Basing A Study On Your Chart, I Have Enhanced A Projection Of A Possible Next Future For The Following Days. Market Is Still Bullish But We Have To Be Aware Of Next Abc Keeping An Eye To Make Sure Is An Abc And Wait The End Of This Abc Looking For A Support Line, Bullish Candle, Big Volume Bar, Etc.

 

This Last Coment Would Be My Long Enter Criteria Once The Next Abc Finishes.

 

It Is A Pleassure For Me To Keep In Touch With You. You Are Quite Open Minded And Observant And This Is Very Constructive Because Make Us Consider A Wider Range Of Scenarios.

 

Thanks Walter

 

Hope You Enjoy The Chart I Think Is Quite Detailed And Helpful. To Have In Mind Where We Are And What Can Come First (the Big Picture) Is Very Important To Develop A Strategy And Be Aware And Sure For The Next Entries

 

 

Great MX ¡¡ let me tell you that YOU are the open minded here and I have great respect for your great actitude..

I think there is a great improvement here and I like to refresh Elliot... Its the core morfology for any serious fibonacci analist... Did you calculate what price level should hit the 161.8% proyeccion ? would be nice to have it... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi walter,

 

ive been out for this weekend and couldnt read your post since then. on monday morning Ill come back to study the charts and make a projection on fibonacci levels. dax and es.

 

actually, since I see the markets under elliotts view my trade has improved hughly. this doesnt mean that I consider other types of analysis to form my enter criteria like vsa or candle patterns but, elliott and fibo combined are like the frame you never have to ignore to know where the market is and where it seems to go aswell as if the trend is starting or beeing exhausted.

 

thanks also to wsam for enhancing his explanation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mal,

I enjoy your posts and your market analysis. I do not use Elliott nor Fibonacci in my own work, but I often find that your market view of the DAX agrees with my view of the DJ Euro Stoxx50 and FTSE.

Like you, I got out of my long positions at the close on Friday 18th, and am watching for indications for a short position until Friday 1st June/Monday 4th June. Then I see an increased chance for more upside action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  malvado xetra said:
brownsfan,

 

I would like you to give me and explain in more detail spinnings and volume bars relationships with charts please. I dont know too much about these interactions. specially about what you say of the equilibrium market please

 

thanks MX

 

MX - here's the deal - if you are going to trade and/or make trading plans based on candlesticks, you need to study them first. Your comment here clearly tells me that you probably saw some candlesticks illustrated on the net somewhere and therefore using them is easy...

 

Here's what I suggest:

 

1) Buy the book I reviewed here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f8/japanese-candlestick-charting-techniques-second-edition-1561.html

2) Study it over and over again.

3) Learn what a candle may be 'telling' you vs. just looking for shapes and making your analysis of that.

 

It's late, I've had a long weekend and I'm not about to teach Candles 101 here. If you are going to use candles in your analysis, you need to learn how they work before even considering using them.

 

I will leave you with one suggestion - each candle that is printed is in fact 'telling' you a story. It's a story of the bulls vs. the bears. EVERY single candle plainly illustrates the fight between the bulls and the bears and who won that fight, each and every time. Sometimes there is no clear winner... (doji / spinning top).

 

That may be a bit deeper than you want to take your candle analysis; however, I would suggest you learn about them before even attempting to use them in your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.