Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

josephhawkins

Do 90% of Day Traders Lose Money?

Recommended Posts

Hey,

I started "day trading" with $40 000 CAD 3 weeks ago. I am up to $46 500 which represents an increase of a little more than 15% overall. Note that I am limited to 1-2 trades a week (since I have to wait 3 days for my funds to become available). But after reading many specialists say 90% of traders lose money, I am under the impression that this is just the luck of the beginner and that I will eventually lose all my profits in the near future.

So am I doing something right or is this just the luck of the beginner?

PS: I do not make random trades so I am not gambling. I usually hold a few hours but sometimes will keep 1-2 days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey,

I started "day trading" with $40 000 CAD 3 weeks ago. I am up to $46 500 which represents an increase of a little more than 15% overall. Note that I am limited to 1-2 trades a week (since I have to wait 3 days for my funds to become available). But after reading many specialists say 90% of traders lose money, I am under the impression that this is just the luck of the beginner and that I will eventually lose all my profits in the near future.

So am I doing something right or is this just the luck of the beginner?

PS: I do not make random trades so I am not gambling. I usually hold a few hours but sometimes will keep 1-2 days.

 

15% is great. No one knows what will happen next and we can all debate what just happened. Expect to have losing days, weeks, months, and years in your trading career.

 

40k is a low amount to trade with. With a 15% gain in a few weeks, I suspect you are taking on a bit too much risk for your account size if that is all the funds you have to commit to trading. If you have a lot more funds than 40k, then that is a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey,

I started "day trading" with $40 000 CAD 3 weeks ago. I am up to $46 500 which represents an increase of a little more than 15% overall. Note that I am limited to 1-2 trades a week (since I have to wait 3 days for my funds to become available). But after reading many specialists say 90% of traders lose money, I am under the impression that this is just the luck of the beginner and that I will eventually lose all my profits in the near future.

So am I doing something right or is this just the luck of the beginner?

PS: I do not make random trades so I am not gambling. I usually hold a few hours but sometimes will keep 1-2 days.

 

First... what you are doing doesn't fit the definition of "day trading". Second... over such a small sampling size, there is no way to gauge your performance... it may just be dumb luck. I would almost venture that you may have not seen a losing trade... certainly not a series of losing trades. The one thing you have in your favor right now is that you've managed to credit your account with $6500 (good for you). Imagine how it would feel if it were reversed, and you were trying to dig out of that hole.

 

Speaking from personal experience, the most difficult aspect of trading for a living is getting over the hump of being a break-even trader. This can be a slog at times, but that's what you've signed up for... it may take a while.

 

I amuse myself... "digging out of that hole". My bad... stop digging, start filling...

Edited by jpennybags

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey,

I started "day trading" with $40 000 CAD 3 weeks ago. I am up to $46 500 which represents an increase of a little more than 15% overall. Note that I am limited to 1-2 trades a week (since I have to wait 3 days for my funds to become available). But after reading many specialists say 90% of traders lose money, I am under the impression that this is just the luck of the beginner and that I will eventually lose all my profits in the near future.

So am I doing something right or is this just the luck of the beginner?

PS: I do not make random trades so I am not gambling. I usually hold a few hours but sometimes will keep 1-2 days.

 

From what I recall, a Taiwanese (?) study who followed the performance of >1,000 day traders for over a decade, came to the gruelling conclusion, that 99,7% of all day traders lose money in the long run. The remaining 0,3% made 5% p.a. on average, with a tiny subset of these making the high double digit returns almost every other trader on the internet seems to pull before breakfast or hopes to pull in the very near future, lol.

 

On this basis I'd urge you to find a better place for your money. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From what I recall, a Taiwanese (?) study who followed the performance of >1,000 day traders for over a decade, came to the gruelling conclusion, that 99,7% of all day traders lose money in the long run. The remaining 0,3% made 5% p.a. on average, with a tiny subset of these making the high double digit returns almost every other trader on the internet seems to pull before breakfast or hopes to pull in the very near future, lol.

 

On this basis I'd urge you to find a better place for your money. :(

 

....a Taiwanese (?) study....

 

can you provide that source, pls?

 

thx

 

nakachalet@gmail.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I want to share my personal experience in trading since I started last year with a very little knowledge, I trade mainly on crypto trading platforms as I am very interested in the philosophy behind btc and open source blockchain. With time I got interested to try to trade and started to try to, I bought, waited a little bit sold for little gain, bought again BUT i didn't know about simple instruments and advanced order types. So basically my first trades were at a loss. 

After I gained a little bit more knowledge I learned about leverage when I started trading on Bitmex and later on Primexbt, boy it was more exiting but this was the time when emotions during trading took over me and made a loss, got liquidated few times because I didn't know how to properly use my stop loss or completely forgot about it. Lately I am much better but this comes after making mistakes for almost one year. Have in mind that i didn't had much time to focus on this because I was working other job all day. 

So in conclusion my first trades in the first few months were utterly failures. I can say that this happens because of lack of education or prior experience, but at the moment I am happy as thanks to this I learned about market cycles/trends, leverage trading, stop-loss, advance order types like OCO etc..., learned what correlates and what does not. Learned about rising and falling wedges etc... All comes down to one thing: education and experience.

But yes first comes loses and knowledge, later some profits :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am coming across this question for the second time. The first time, I had thought of passing it. But the subject of trading, especially profitable trading being dear to my heart, I had to come back to answer it.

First things first. You have done well to get 30% profit as you have stated. I hope you are still maintaining profitability though would not be surprised if the profit is gone.

Now coming to your question— The answer is YES.

One or two percentage points more or less do not matter. It is a fact that winning traders are far fewer than losing traders.

And this has been emphasized in most of the answers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.