Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Emily291

Would You Leverage This Strategy?

Recommended Posts

If you had a strategy that had tested well and then performed in live trading as predicted by your testing, and it had a maximum historical drawdown of 20% with no leverage, would you leverage it? If so, by how much?

 

Em

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Em,

 

You’ve provided tmi. NOT! :)

What is the characteristic slope of the equity curve when system is not in drawdown?

What is the system’s variability of returns? ... what’s its variability of risk per trade ?

What percentage of the time is the system in drawdown?

Is that 20% max drawdown on Total Equity Max Drawdown or Closed Equity Max Drawdown?

Have you run optimal - f for this system (using > than max loss in the max loss parameter) ?

... and used that in running Holding Period Return ?

 

btw

the max drawdown factor (of live trades or of historical testing) for a system to this date is not very useful info

bcse in the real world

The next systemic drawdown is 100% +

Or not.:roll eyes:

Maybe. :)

 

This leveraging decision depends greatly on how much heat and drawdown you are willing to accept. ie

How aggressive are you? Like

Where on the [it’s ‘gunslinger’ money] <-> [it’s ‘I have commitments’ money] continuum are these funds?

Etc ? etc. ?

 

Hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Emily291 said:
If you had a strategy that had tested well and then performed in live trading as predicted by your testing, and it had a maximum historical drawdown of 20% with no leverage, would you leverage it? If so, by how much?

 

Em

 

A lot of ifs.

 

Find a period of time that it didn't perform as tested. Then, when found, decide whether you want to leverage or trade the strategy at all.

 

If you can't find a period of time that doesn't perform as tested, you do not know how to rigorously test data. In this case, get it over with. Max leverage and get rich or go home broke in the shortest amount of time possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just guess, if you can not control other people lost or input money. In a simple interactive system, just between you and the system. In an 20% drawdown, if you a smarter trader, you can cut the lost at 1/3(-7%), which means system can go up 20% if lost -20%, then you probably can leverage 3x, since once you cash out you winning money, system might go down if there no people contritube money into system. But in an continute game, others might have a chance to get a higher reward after you cash out your profit early for capital rebalancing. This is my observation, I am not sure it's right or wrong. Have a fun.:crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“if you a smarter trader, you can cut the lost at 1/3(-7%)” wmck6167

If you’re saying kill the system at 7%, I don’t agree necessarily, but I do understand... but if you’re saying temporarily turn it off at 7 % , that is system trading heresy. With system trading, missing ANY signals is big no no...

Like -when would you start it back up? ie If you’re great or even just good enough at timing to know when to turn a system on and off, then you likely don’t need a system at all - unless you want automation. At the very least, that is the perfect way to get no where near the results testing revealed bcse you’re really no longer trading the same system... and

usually 'skipping signals' is a ticket for much worse consequences...

To illustrate in the extreme - if you turned the system off after every loss and turned it back after every what would have been a winning signal, you would be actually trading a whole different system from the original design... ie skipping any signal is changing to a different system on the fly...

 

 

"Find a period of time that it didn't perform as tested. Then,..." MM

OR

(btw This is system dependent - ie it’s not optimal for all systems ... but,)

For most systems you can find another system that is negatively correlated and size it up, relative to the main system, when/as main system goes into drawdown

... with correctly paired systems, this works in the long run whether the neg corr’d system is profitable on its own or not !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your feedback. It's a great comment. Just I have some other thoughts about this.

"...With system trading, missing ANY signals is big no no..." If all of traders follow the rules, will system stop draw down process when enough lost occurred at -1/3 position since eveyone are so smart?

Here I think you meant in trading system. What if trading system is conflicted with value system? will you still follow the trading signal? (I assume "time frame" is not considered in this argument) I meant in under value situation, the draw down process induces trading signal, will you still follow the trading signal to cut the lost? Trading and value sometime, I think, maybe it like a double edge of sword? Just curious of some thoughts.

 

When system is against you, defensive strangety is working well, but when system is in the favor of cooperated with you, will you still following this rule? "missing ANY signals is big no no." Thanks and you have a great day.:missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" If all of traders follow the rules, will system stop draw down process when enough lost occurred at -1/3 position since eveyone are so smart?"

eveyone here are not so smart enough to understand what you just said :?:

applying pure honey technologies in sugar land yet? ;)

 

Generally -

Rule trading is not system trading.

True system trading and discretionary trading - mutually exclusive. Period.

Ie if any discretion is applied, it’s no longer system trading

Ie The only important value in system trading is to do everything you can to avoid missing signals... in good system trading you will still inevitably miss signals, but never because you 'decided' to...

So to answer your question - yes, in system trading, I will “still follow the trading signal” even when it conflicts with my ‘values’

 

When the system is working for you is THE time when you for sure do not want to be missing signals...

bcse for some systems - especially ‘truer’ trend systems - missing just one trade (that murphy happens to be an outlier) can ‘ruin’ a whole year of the system’s life. Been there, done that. It's not so stark for other types of systems, but missing signals / temporarily discretionarily turning it off still inevitably degrades the bottom line...

 

Good system design does strictly control risk per trade. However drawdowns and risk per trade are ‘difernt parts of the aminal’.

 

hope this clarifies. Have a good one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments. However I may not completely agree with you.

"The only important value in system trading is to do everything you can to avoid missing signals... " I just wonder if system is again you, it might put you under more risk if you just purely follow the signal, in an interactive system.:missy:

It might be riskier that you were cooperated to "lost" more if you just follow the signal rules if market were against you. Our eyes and feelling are always eay be trapped...Maybe. Just for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wmck6167 said:
Thanks for your comments. However I may not completely agree with you.

"The only important value in system trading is to do everything you can to avoid missing signals... " I just wonder if system is again you, it might put you under more risk if you just purely follow the signal, in an interactive system.:missy:

It might be riskier that you were cooperated to "lost" more if you just follow the signal rules if market were against you. Our eyes and feelling are always eay be trapped...Maybe. Just for fun.

 

Rule trading is not system trading.

Discretionary trading is not system trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, still have question to ask. Is System trading using rules to trade? The other is "time". Sometime signals appeared at low time frame, but it disapperred on anther time frame. For example, the signal showed up in 5 minutes but dissappeared in 1hr time frme. If you have set up at price, then you might interact with this signal. But afterward, in 1Hr, you found you are one of the contributers for the lost. How do you deal with time issue on system trading regarding to the singal issue you just mentioned. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not providing enough information for a response. A 20% DD for a strategy that provides 100% per year vs 8% per year would be very different. Also, is that DD for one day, one month or one year. What is the asset class you are trading?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.