Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Frustrating Bond Trade

Recommended Posts

Here's a trade I did today in the 30 year bonds with a horrible execution.

 

2 losing trades.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=1432&stc=1&d=1178815172

 

The first arrow shows my short entry. Price rallies at the open and is rejected 1 tick away from VAL. The reason for my short was because bonds opened below value.

 

Entry: The price rejection at 111 18/32 was pretty quick and I watched prices auction a for the one 5 minute bar. My tape reading skills in the bonds is still unexperienced compared to the YM and I hesitated and went short with a market order which got me filled at 111 13/32. The moment I was filled, I knew I had made a horrible entry. Normally, I would use a 3 tick stop. But because of my horrible entry I decided to use a 6 tick stop right above the HOD. About half hour later I was stopped out by 1 tick. Approx. 200 contracts trade on a 3000 thick contract ask. I was one of the 200 lots.

 

I then reshorted at the blue arrow labeled #1. I felt better about the entry but had my eyes glued on tape. About a half hour later, I felt prices holding firmly at 111 15/32. I decided to cover for a scratch trade. Shortly after, bonds declined for approx 4 ticks past my entry.

 

A couple of things come to mind. My hesitation on the first trade. My loss on my first trade affected my second trade.

 

I would like to receive some feedbacks. Any criticism is welcome. Thanks

losingtrademay10.thumb.gif.bc1c2bdca9e1b08e6ca256ab6f74a379.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the daily chart it looks like the start of an up trend so weren't you breaching your own trading rules by taking a short? The first hourly candle was bullish too and on high volume so it looks like you paid the price for ignoring your own rules.

 

I personally concentrate on the fundamentals for trading bonds and treasuries, especially on days like today with the weak trade number and expected weak retail sales number tomorrow being bullish for bonds. I didn't trade ZN today but probably will after tomorrow's retail sales number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The daily chart looked mixed to me. So I went down to the 65 minute. The chart below shows a 2 day downtrend in the bonds. Hence the reason for a short.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=1433&stc=1&d=1178817436

 

Yes, I definitely need to be more aware of the fundamentals with the bonds and how they react to numbers. In hindsight the volume spikes of the past sessions shows good support compared to todays volume at the lows.

65minutebonds.thumb.gif.34cd759aaf50b6d8a227d3cd1d11c3d5.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe tape reading in the bonds isnt as useful as the dow. There are a lot of curve trades and locals scratching contracts that they got from the pit in the bonds. So, hitting the bid might just be the other leg of a yield curve trade.

 

U might want to listen to the bonds squawk and get a feel for what goldman is doing in the pit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you say about the yield curve is exactly what I was thinking. Unlike the Dow there's no speculative retail participation in the bonds. There's yield curve traders, arbitrageurs, hedgers and long term investors to name a few so how could you make sense of all that from the tape? You have my admiration if you can.

 

I don't agree with what you say about the bond squawk because most of the volume is electronic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you say about the yield curve is exactly what I was thinking. Unlike the Dow there's no speculative retail participation in the bonds. There's yield curve traders, arbitrageurs, hedgers and long term investors to name a few so how could you make sense of all that from the tape? You have my admiration if you can.

 

I don't agree with what you say about the bond squawk because most of the volume is electronic.

 

 

 

Bonds squawk are mostly on options and yield curve. Not much outright quotes.

At least u know PIMCO and goldman are huge sellers of puts or buyers of calls, then u can develop a bias. Better than watching the screen's time & sales trying to figure out what the uptick and dntick means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never used a bond squawk. I've only ever used the tradersaudio S&P Squawk which I found worse than useless. Do you have any recommendations for a bond squawk and how to use it? I'm not concerned with catching every tick, just the bigger moves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never used a bond squawk. I've only ever used the tradersaudio S&P Squawk which I found worse than useless. Do you have any recommendations for a bond squawk and how to use it? I'm not concerned with catching every tick, just the bigger moves.

 

 

 

Ben at tradersaudio has a bonds squawk. Sign up for a trial and see how it works for u.

 

They used to post all the big options trades at the end of day. Not anymore now. Here is an attachment of the whole 2005 big options trade. U can see for urself whether it has any predictability. But from what i remember, i heard a lot of big boys bidding when we bottom on June 06.

 

But anyway, i dont trade it anymore. I have found little success trading it. The crowd is too professional and not a good day trading market. This market almost exclusively move on reports and has limited range during non-report hours relative to the minimum tick size. I think it is good to position trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

James,

 

If you can trade the ES on a purely technical level, without the crutch of market internals, then you can trade the Ags....

 

Just my two and 3/4 cents worth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James, have you started trading grains yet? I'm watching bonds, but makes me want to zzzzzz...

 

Grains are really interesting contracts (sorry bit off topic). From a fundamental perspective I like corn contracts because of the larger use of corn production in ethenol fuel.

 

Being an Aussie, I'm looking at metals hmmmmm Uranium!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James - my only feedback on that trade was that your short entry was done on a hammer type line. To me, that's either a bullish entry or a reason to not go short. I personally don't care of the bonds as your 5 min chart showed very, very little movement in my opinion. I know the ticks are worth more, but I need volatility and the bonds simply do not have that many days. Perhaps a volume based chart would work better in bonds, just a suggestion.

 

One suggestion James - instead of jumping from the indexes, to bonds, to grains, to metals to the next greatest futures contract, why not stick with one and become a specialist on that one market? Perhaps this is another discussion in and of itself, but one thing I see here is the jumping from one market to the next. Trust me when I say this - changing markets is not the problem and/or solution. I've been there and done that, so please let my mistakes and thousands of dollars save you some time. Become a specialist in one market and then exploit the hell out of that market.

 

I liken it to becoming a highly paid brain surgeon or a general practitioner. You can be a jack of all trades and be ok at those, or be really, really good at one thing. That's how I operated my stockbroker business and it's how I operate my trading business. I learned years ago that you will never be really good at a whole bunch of things, so I suggest becoming an expert in one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
James - my only feedback on that trade was that your short entry was done on a hammer type line. To me, that's either a bullish entry or a reason to not go short. I personally don't care of the bonds as your 5 min chart showed very, very little movement in my opinion. I know the ticks are worth more, but I need volatility and the bonds simply do not have that many days. Perhaps a volume based chart would work better in bonds, just a suggestion.

 

One suggestion James - instead of jumping from the indexes, to bonds, to grains, to metals to the next greatest futures contract, why not stick with one and become a specialist on that one market? Perhaps this is another discussion in and of itself, but one thing I see here is the jumping from one market to the next. Trust me when I say this - changing markets is not the problem and/or solution. I've been there and done that, so please let my mistakes and thousands of dollars save you some time. Become a specialist in one market and then exploit the hell out of that market.

 

I liken it to becoming a highly paid brain surgeon or a general practitioner. You can be a jack of all trades and be ok at those, or be really, really good at one thing. That's how I operated my stockbroker business and it's how I operate my trading business. I learned years ago that you will never be really good at a whole bunch of things, so I suggest becoming an expert in one.

 

Thank you Brownsfan. Some very good advice. I currently trade the YM and Bonds only. I do agree with specialization but have been interested in picking up a new contract besides the YM, hence the ZB.

 

I took 6 ticks on the bonds this morning. Im definitely going to be trading the YM always but will slowly start learning the bonds.

 

Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with the specialisation idea. It's probably wise if you're just scalping but for position or swing trading or even day trading when you only make one or two trades a day per contract, diversification is key. If you have good set ups in different contracts and you have say 5 open positions at any one time, it's highly likely that every day will be a profitable day. I trade YM, ZN, GBP/USD and QM but I'm also looking at trading other contracts. I'm planning to add a new market one at a time and once I'm comfortable trading it, move on to the next. Gilts, Eurobunds, FTSE, Stoxx, sugar and corn are on my "to do" list. I've looked at gold and the Asian stock indices and didn't find them to my liking. I'm not saying this is necessarily the best way to trade, just that scalping is not necessarily the best way to trade either. To me the issue isn't whether a contract is fast or exciting but whether I can profit from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

notouch - I would be concerned with information overload with many different markets in front of you. It seems to me that James and a few others here jump from one ship to the next before conquering their first endeavor. And I understand why, I used to do that myself. I think trading multiple markets is a great idea if you can do it, but you first have to be able to trade ONE profitably. If you can't trade the YM, odds are you won't be able to trade the QM, EC, DAX, etc. etc. Yes, there are exceptions based on the market being traded, but I doubt too many of us here have finely tuned trading methodologies based on each individual market. Most probably have their way of trading and then apply it to that market. Assuming that is true, mastering one market before venturing into another is something to consider.

 

I would also add that if you can master an index for example, you can easily just trade that with large size vs. trying to get trades on in 10 different markets each day. I've been content lately with just trading the ES and to be honest, it's much less stressful. I have no liquidity issues and have one chart open. That's kinda nice actually. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree you need to master one before adding another but you have to appreciate that swing and position trading is very different from scalping. With swing trading you're making one trade and leaving it for a month. Is sitting there staring at the same chart a good use of your time? I definitely agree that for scalpers who need to be watching the same chart from open to close, it makes more sense to increase the number of contracts you trade. For longer term trading though it makes sense to diversify instead of putting all your eggs in one basket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.