Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Intrinsic Reasons for Support and Resistance changing roles

Recommended Posts

Hello dear fellow traders, I am working on other thread around the "flip" trade, its a neat idea for scalping that I am experimenting and it looks like it has some posible bright future...

 

My question here, and I would love to hear some bright minds here at TL thinking is : Why or wich is the reason (what happens inside the market) to make a previous resistance level now become a support...

 

It happens over and over again, on any time frame, its incredible when you start paying atention to this fenomena, how it works...

 

There has to be a clear reason in terms of market internal behaviour that I would love to hear your interpretations...

 

Take your time, maybe when you take an inmersion bath on your hot tub as Aristotle did you can meditate on this fenomena and we can all say Eureka ¡¡

 

Expect your disertations, cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason is that bad traders (i.e. most traders) like to get out of their bad trades at break even. So traders who sold at resistance only to see the price rise and go against them will buy as soon the price comes back to where they sold. As the bad traders buy to close their bad positions, this creates support where the resistance was. On top of this, good traders understand what's happening and know that the previous resistance will provide support so they buy at that level too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a area of resistance is taken out, the shorts who sold are in pain. As prices come back to their entry point they will most likely cover to limit their losses. Also, the shorts who planned to sell at resistance but did not are no longer thinking of shorting. Instead, they are likely to switch from a short to long mindset. This throws in another group of buy orders at that price level. Combine that with traders who love to buy pullbacks and you have buy orders from different traders across the board. This will cause resistance to become support.

 

Once you got the late shorts covering at a loss and momentum traders joining in, price is going to rally until the late comers appear. My 2cents :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that it takes effort in the way of $ to break through resistance or support, so maybe price gets shut down when the effort to pass through isnt worth the reward on the other side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is just matter of $$$$, and the winner defending their investment.

 

Look at this pic, each arrows is 700+ ES cars on that time interval. With that many sellers to short at 11220 area, it takes a lot of buying powers to over come that area.

 

so what happen when buyers and sellers dual out again at that area. Only one side will win. Either seller able to cap it or buyer able to break out it. The winning side must out power the other side. Simple as that.

 

So if buyer is able to break out of that resistance. which means a lot of $$$$$. they sure will defend it when it gets challenged again, so they do not lose money on their position. Thus Resistance become Support or vise versa.

 

It is the big boys who can muscle the market that matter. They are the one who created S/R. So they are the one who will react to those S/R, if that is where they conduct their business at.

 

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=1409&stc=1&d=1178597719

bbdefarea.png.802d19ac461aeb3d8d53ece477edf511.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

 

It is the big boys who can muscle the market that matter. They are the one who created S/R. So they are the one who will react to those S/R, if that is where they conduct their business at.

 

Doesn't smart money (aka Professional Money) create faux S/R levels so as to trap unwittingly buyers and sellers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooter, as for me, I have no way of telling if Smart money is the one who is capping, all I have is data from tape and I do my best dedution out of it. And I would guess that most people can not know who is capping in this case.

 

It is base on this logic that I made my analysis.

 

The pic dose not tell the whole story, as it leaves out any transaction below 700 cars. so during any 1m interval, there could be a flux of sub-700 cars, and the chart is not showing.

 

again, my logic is that any time there is a transaction that big, some one is serious. on top of that, if there are many of them at a price level, then that some one is dead serious about protecting that price level.

 

so carry this forward, to break out of that R level, a lot of money will have to be involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this logic would not be completed without knowing how pro traders dose things.

 

I personally met a few traders working for big companies. they all made very good living earning their pay check and commissions from those companies.

 

Once they made that big $$$$, they live very comfortable life, which takes a lot $$$$ to maintain it.

 

what dose all these mean? that means they must perform, so at end of each month, they can collect that bonus to support their life style.

 

To perform simply means to make money for companies they work for, and they can do what they can to a limit, usually the risk control department come to tell them to stop.

 

And btw, they are not smarter or more displine then individual traders, one of edge they have is that some one else is force the displine for them.(risk control department). and the other is the amount of contract they can trade.

 

After I put all these together, then what I posted was my observation.

 

weiwei

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now my conclusion on why support become Resistance and vise versa.

 

Using my pic as an example, to break that R level, it takes a lot of $$$$, commitment , and your job on the line. Once those pro traders able to push higher, they sure will defend their profit when it is challenged again, because they would want to get that bonus at end of each month.

 

weiwei

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When a breakout takes place, you got different types of traders participating in it:

 

1) Those who are stopped out

 

2) Those who enter at BO

 

3) Those who fade the BO

 

4) Those who wait for confirmation and/or retracement before getting in

 

Breakouts often generate spikes because of the many orders placed around those areas.

 

Soon after a BO markets usually lose momentum or volatility...this is due to profit taking and prices becoming less attractive because of overbought/sold conditions.

 

This is why markets often retrace to the BO level...that was the level where most of liquidity was, and the big players must place their bets in highly liquid areas to keep slippage to a minimum.

 

I also believe that since markets move within blocks or key areas, they re-test a prior area before moving to the next one...just to make sure that the BO was for real and not a fakeout.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea that support becomes resistance and vice versa is in my opinion not a good description to use. It gives the impression (often false) that when price moves down (up) to one of these points, it will bounce back up (down). So what are support/resistance points? They are points where the price action PAUSES, before either moving on in the same direction, or reversing. There is usually low volatility at these points and so they represent a good place to either exit a trade if you are in one, or initiate a new trade. The direction the market will go in from these pause points will of course depend on other factors.

 

Looked at in this way, s/r points then become decision points for you the trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.