Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ereanoraella

What is Leverage?

Recommended Posts

Leverage is amount of money added proportionally to your deposit (50, 100, 500) when you open an order. While your order is active you can't lost more than your trading margin. When you close your order leverage money return to liquidity provider. For example I trade 1:500 leverage with Hotforex, which means that for one full trade lot (100K $) I need only 200$ free margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can look through all the definitions on the net, but when it comes to trading think of it this way.

If your gross exposure to an instrument or portfolio is more than your cash in an account you are using leverage.

This will then apply to futures - as they are traded on margin.

Options - as they can give you extra convexity

shares - if you are trading on margin

shorts - because technically your losses may be greater than what is in your account.

 

 

fxeconomst is incorrect when he says - "While your order is active you can't lost more than your trading margin"

 

The broker will chase you for any extra losses your account sustains as a result of gaps and stops not being sufficient to cover your margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you can look through all the definitions on the net, but when it comes to trading think of it this way.

If your gross exposure to an instrument or portfolio is more than your cash in an account you are using leverage.

This will then apply to futures - as they are traded on margin.

Options - as they can give you extra convexity

shares - if you are trading on margin

shorts - because technically your losses may be greater than what is in your account.

 

 

fxeconomst is incorrect when he says - "While your order is active you can't lost more than your trading margin"

 

The broker will chase you for any extra losses your account sustains as a result of gaps and stops not being sufficient to cover your margin.

 

Hi SIUYA,

 

What does the term 'gearing' mean? Is this simply the amount of leverage that is used?

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SIUYA,

 

What does the term 'gearing' mean? Is this simply the amount of leverage that is used?

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I think it is pretty much the same definition - interchangeable, but while levergae is expressed as a % gearing might be expressed as a ratio.

I also thought that gearing was more the coloquial expression - that family is geared to the hilt, v the more formal business definition - that firm has a leverage ratio of 300% on its assets.

It seems only a few places use this expression but it seems appropriate given the use of gears to increase/decrease speeds!

 

Usually if say you have 4: 1 (or 400%) leverage, it means you have gearing of 4:1.

 

 

........side bar deviation

 

Its an interesting issue as there are lots of definitions around, and I have seen some argue that if say for every $1 in an account, $1 is borrowed this is 100% geared.....which is why one needs to be clear about how they define many things, and exactly what it is they are getting. Which is why I pretty much look at things from an 'exposure' point of view.

 

an example....

when the marketing of 130/30 funds are bandied about then one might think this means it has greater than 100% leverage. However most often the gearing might only be 30%-60%, and some would argue that it is Net Exposure neutral (hence the introduction of gross and net exposures to often disguise gearing IMHO), as the long 30%, v short 30% offset each other......

In my terminology I would say the fund has the potential to have an additional 30-60% gearing/leverage through its gross exposure, but even though its net exposure is likely to be neutral, you still have gearing/leverage.

All too often leverage is hidden, or implicit in many things and yet we over look it - Taleb talks about this in his recent book and like him or hate him, if you look at the leverage you can get in some things in life particularly the leverage from convexity and optionality it changes how you look at things.

 

As an old market maker we often had a lot of gross exposure, a lot of leverage and were highly geared, but we also had a lot of net neutral exposures with low risk. Think of what it costs to buy calls, sell stocks on margin.....and do this many, many times, with offsets whereby puts are sold, or other offsetting calls are also sold.

 

...i deviated a little from my first answer :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leverage is the ability of a trader to control a big market with a small investment, and this leverage is given by broker. For instance For example, to control a $100,000 position, your broker will set aside $1,000 from your account. Your leverage, which is expressed in ratios, is now 100:1.You can now controlling $100,000 with $1,000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi guys,

 

Have a good day. What is correct the meaning - Leverage? Explain me.

 

leverage it's more like a loan from your brokers, makes your deposit would worth higher than initial amount, i used 1:500 on my Armada markets account means, my deposit are worth 500x times, and can made any transaction equal to 500x, have the same potential but also a risk. here's a simple video brief how forex trading works, move to 1:06

explanation.

hope this would help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The power given to traders by brokers to control a bigger amount of money in the forex market; Leverage works like a two edged sword, it can help you make profits quickly and you can loose your account as well from using a large leverage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Leverage can be created through options, futures, margin and other financial instruments. For example, say you have $1,000 to invest.

 

Is this explanation complete? It left me hanging

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When an investor decides to invest in the Forex market, he or she must first open up a margin account with a broker. Usually, the amount of leverage provided is either 50:1, 100:1 or 200:1, depending on the broker and the size of the position the investor is trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Leverage means the advantageous condition of having a relatively small amount of cost yield a relatively high level of returns.

 

Exactly, go detail in trading, higher leverage allow you to trade higher volume with less fund.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leverage is an investment strategy of using borrowed money — specifically, the use of various financial instruments or borrowed capital — to increase the potential return of an investment.Leverage can also refer to the amount of debt a firm uses to finance assets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leverage has slightly different meanings in personal finance, investing and business. But in each case, leverage is the use of debt to help achieve a financial or business goal. Leverage is the use of borrowed funds to increase one's trading position beyond what would be available from their cash balance alone. Forex traders often use leverage to profit from relatively small price changes in currency pairs. Leverage, however, can amplify both profits as well as losses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.