Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Hurst Cycle Analysis

Recommended Posts

Hurst Cycle Analysis

 

An American aerospace engineer, J.M Hurst was one of the first people to use computer technology to plot and analyze the cyclical behaviors that can be found in the financial markets. This occurred as early as the 1960s, and shortly after he published The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing, where the introduced the theories that would eventually form the basis for what we now call the Hurst Cycle.

 

Hurst’s approach to the market rests on the idea that multiple cycles act in concert as price and time moves forward in the financial markets. Hurt’s explanations stopped short of what actually cause these cycles, but he still believed these occurrences could be understood in ways that would allow traders to profit from them. Hurst’s studies included more than 1,000 different asset types, as he sought to understand the nature of price changes rather than to attempt cornering any single market.

 

Summary of Concepts

 

The mathematics behind Hurst’s approach can be difficult to understand, but the main points can be summarized here:

 

● The financial markets behave in a cyclical fashion.

● There is a set of number recurring cycles that range from short to long time intervals. This cyclical set is referred to as the Nominal Model (shown in the first table below).

● Market cycles are harmonic, and relate with other by factors of two or three

● Cycles build on each other, creating larger composite cycles. This is also referred to as the principle of Summation.

● Longer cycles generate larger changes in price. Hurst referred to this as the principle of Proportionality.

● Lows for the cycle unfold quickly when short composite cycles create troughs in the same region. This is also referred to as Synchronicity.

● Cyclical peaks will often appear rounded, whereas troughs are usually sharper.

● Variations in cycle length will occur, but market cycles always revert back to their averages.

 

Harmonic Ratios and Cycle Periods

 

One of Hurst’s central discoveries was that market cycles are not random in terms of periodic wavelength. Instead, the prominent wavelengths are related by a harmonic ratio (factors of two or three). According to Hurst, these wavelengths are recurring and can be applied to all markets. These wavelengths can be divided in terms of time and can be found in the table below:

 

2pqntpv.jpg

 

The time periods stretch from 5 days to 18 years. In the table above, we can see that there is the potential for variation within each wavelength. But these variations will be minimal and will always revert back to their averages. Hurst also found that the market’s dominant cycles will have synchronized troughs but not synchronized peaks. This is a critical element of the Hurst cycle analysis as it allows traders to project the size of the wavelengths that will follow.

 

Ultimately, the underlying trend can be defined as the motive effect of the longer term cycle, relative to the shorter term cycle you are trading. Trading in the direction of the broader cycle can help to improve positioning probabilities.

 

Analyzing Sentiment

 

The central idea behind Hurst’s cycles is that nature tends to move in a predictable rhythm. For example, night and day changes at the same rate, and the seasons follow one another in a fashion that can be anticipated. These expectations can be applied to the financial markets, as well. Optimism and pessimism unfold in cyclical ways, first tentatively and then with greater force as more of the market starts to accept the changing reality. These trends (price movements) then reach a point of exhaustion, traders realize that prices have deviated too far from their historical average, and then the trend starts to reverse.

 

This, of course, is a simplified view of market activity. But most sentiment behavior follows along these lines and, as a result, should not be viewed as random. In any given moment, there can be a variety of sentiment cycles acting at once. Short term trends might be bearish while medium or long term trends are bullish. Everything comes down to the current cycle and the peripheral cycle that most directly influences it.

 

Hurst Cycles Peaks, Troughs, and Wavelengths

 

In some cases, price cycles will be clear and obvious. In other cases, they won’t. To some, this might suggest that trading with cycles is unreliable. But when the right tools are applied, these types of strategies can start to show much better results. The black line in the chart graphic below shows a cycle starts by falling to a trough at point A. The cycle then turns positive through point B and rises to a peak at point C. A similar movement follows, only in reverse -- falling back through point D and than to another trough at point E. As a point of illustration, let’s assume that points A and E represent the same price level.

 

jjl30w.png

 

In this case, the distance between points A and E would represent the length (or time period) of the cycle. We can also see the distance from the peak to the trough as the cyclical amplitude. The longer the wavelength, the more power present in the cycle. For example, a one-month cycle will generate larger price moves then a one-week cycle. In the chart example below, we can see how Hurst cycles might look on a bullish swing move:

 

2dl9aw1.png

 

Hurst’s “Valid” Trend Lines

 

Trend lines can be a great tool because of the way they allow traders to bring visual order to the underlying price activity. But Hurst argued that most trend lines are subjective, and that we should instead view price action as a composite of cycles (of differing magnitude). All cycles (shortest to longest) form the composite and define the net effect of the trend (positive or negative). For example, if the Hurst cycles are advancing together, then the long term trend is bullish. This would ultimately meant that the short term Hurst cycles would produce troughs that are successively higher.

 

dy0llj.png

 

The chart graphic above shows a cycle with an underlying trend that is essentially flat. If we were to draw a line connecting the adjacent lows into the future, the result would be horizontal. This line could also be viewed as a support line, as it would attract most of the price activity. But if the longer term cycle is pointed upward, the same action of connecting the troughs would result in an upward trend line where bullish positions could be taken. Hurst argues that these trend lines are objective (i.e. “valid”) because they are based on a clear rule -- connecting the cyclical troughs. These Valid Trend Lines (or VTLs) can also be used in reverse. Any time these formations are broken, it is a signal that the longer trend cycle has reached its conclusion. This information is useful because it gives us an objective trend reading and better insights into the magnitude of the potential reversal.

 

The Future Line of Demarcation (FLD)

 

In conjunction, Hurst also introduced his Future Line of Demarcation, or FLD. Conceptually, the FLD is a bit more complicated. But it is essentially the original Hurst cycle displaced, one-half of the cycle’s period to the right. In the chart below, the FLD is shown as the faint black line. The darker blue line is the Hurst cycle:

 

2zta53m.png

 

As you can see, the FLD is simply a copy of the cycle, moved to the right by half the cycle wavelength. If you cycle is 180 days, you would plot the FLD 90 days to the right.

 

The FLD tells us three things:

 

● Confirmation of a previous peak or trough

● An indication of future price direction

● The magnitude of the following move

 

In the chart below, these three points are outlined:

 

217j2x.png

 

Here, we can see that when the FLD crosses below the Hurst cycle (green circle), the peak of the cycle is confirmed. When the FLD crosses above the Hurst cycle (green circle), the trough of the cycle is confirmed. The following price movement will continue in the direction of the crossover (purple arrows), and the magnitude of the movement that followed will be equal to that of the previous cycle (measured here using the orange line). All of these factors tell us when a Hurst cycle is changing, how far prices are likely to move, and in which direction they are likely to travel. A good way of interpreting the FLD is to assume that the Hurst cycle will peak as the FLD makes a trough, and vice versa.

 

Conclusion: Hurst Cycles Help Define the Predictable Nature of Market Sentiment

 

Hurst’s work might seem complicated at first. But when we look at the underlying reasoning, it merely attempts to describe the predictable nature of market sentiment. There are a variety of platform tools that can be used to express these changes, and most of these tools are best used when traders are looking to define the probabilities for trend continuation or reversal.

a.png.202d2412bdc4a3b166b47c38f4d04a18.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hurst concepts always interesting. Too bad the semantics and verbiage will drive the average trader away instead of pulling them towards understanding the concepts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hurst concepts always interesting. Too bad the semantics and verbiage will drive the average trader away instead of pulling them towards understanding the concepts.

 

I agree. The same with Gann's works and much of really good Elliott's.

 

Just saying.

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.