Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Has the Trend Reversed? Or It is Ready to Resume? 3 Strategies to Know the Difference

Recommended Posts

Has the Trend Reversed? Or It is Ready to Resume? 3 Strategies to Know the Difference

 

A wide variety of studies show that forex markets tend to operate in a trending fashion more than other classes (such as stocks or commodities). The reason for this comes from the fact that valuations in currencies are most closely tied to the broadest macroeconomic factors -- on both the national and global levels. These factors have less of an impact on assets like specific stocks. So for those that spend most of their time trading forex, trend analysis becomes much more important in determining your ability to generate consistent gains.

 

The key questions for any trend-based trade center around the assessment of its cyclical position:

 

  • Is an old trend ending?
  • Is a new trend beginning?
  • Is the trend in need of a correction (an oppositional move toward historical averages)?
  • Is the previously established trend ready to resume after a correction has completed?

 

Inaccurate to these questions result in losing positions. This means you will buy into an uptrend that is ready to reverse, sell a downtrend just before it begins making an upside correction, etc. There are many potential scenarios that could result in losing positions.

So the real work when basing your decisions on trends comes from your work in determining which stage the trend has reached in its overall life cycle. This is obviously a broad topic, so the scope of this article will focus on one potential scenario, asking the question: Is the previous trend ready to resume? When an established trend is ready to resume, high probability positions can be taken and it becomes possible to capitalize on the underlying momentum that is present in the market. Here are three types of market events to watch.

 

Understanding Corrections

 

wvq1hv.jpg

 

First, we must have an understanding of what a market correction looks like. This is the scenario that will need to complete before the trend can resume. In the first chart example, we can see a series of relatively minor downside corrections within a broader uptrend (shown as red arrows). “Market corrections are essential, because no asset can rise or fall indefinitely,” said Sam Kikla, markets analyst at BestCredit. “The market needs an opportunity to ‘take a breath’ and return to its historical averages in order to generate fresh momentum for prices to continue further.” These corrections allow traders to re-enter the market and establish new positions. These new positions are what enable valuations to continue higher or lower.

 

Fibonacci Levels Validated

 

The first chart example shows price corrections that are relatively random in nature. They are all of varying degree and follow no predictable sequence. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this, and this is the way most corrections will unfold as you are watching the trend. But when we add Fibonacci retracements to the equation, we can start to quantify the price lengths that will mark the smaller correction within the larger trend. I will not go into the intricacies of Fibonacci but I have written about some of these previously here. The most commonly watched areas when Fibonacci zones are plotted can be found at the 38.2%, 50%, and 61.8% retracements of the larger move.

 

6iqope.png

 

These levels are used to plot potential points of support (for uptrends) and resistance (for downtrends). In the chart example above, we can see the 38.2% Fibonacci level act as resistance in a broader downtrend. If this level did not hold, it would be a short-term indication that the downtrend could be over -- and traders would then begin to target larger corrections back into the 50% and 61.8% Fib levels (at least). In the example below, the 38.2% retracement does hold, and this then places the focus back on the previous lows that marked the measured move in the downside Fibonacci wave. Aggressive traders could have entered into short positions once prices started to fail at the 38.2% retracement. More conservative traders might want to wait until the longer term support level to break before committing to a position. In both cases, we have signals that the longer term trend is resuming.

 

Consolidation Breakouts: Triangles and Ranges

 

Consolidation Breakouts in the direction of the previous trend mark the second way of determining whether or not the previous trend is in place. Consolidation points are essentially periods of indecision in the market. There is not enough available information for the majority of traders to be swayed in one direction or another. But these periods cannot last forever. When consolidation patterns eventually do break, the break tends to be forceful and decisive. The market has likely received the information it wanted and now prices are ready to make a strong move. When this happens in the direction of the original trend, the signal is more valid as it is supported by the already established momentum of the prior trend.

 

v2ydfr.gif

 

In the example above, we can see that an uptrend has established itself with a strong series of higher highs. This is followed by a period of sideways consolidation that is marked by a decreasing range of constricting support and resistance levels. This gives us the Triangle formation that will be important in determining whether or not the original uptrend will be able to continue. In this example, the breakout is to the upside, and this would be an indication that long positions can still be taken as a way of capitalizing on the broader trend.

 

11792qh.jpg

 

Next, we look at range-bound conditions, where the support and resistance levels are not constricting and sideways trading dominates. Breakouts from these patterns tend to be less forceful. This is because a greater tightening of market energy is required to form a triangle but these are important patterns to watch nonetheless. The chart above shows another bullish scenario, where prices enter the range from the bottom (in an uptrend). Prices test both sides of the range multiple times before breaking to the upside. This confirms that the original bullish trend is still in place and that long positions can still be established.

 

Elliott Wave Completions

 

For those unfamiliar with the basics of Elliott Wave patterns, I have written previously about the main structures here and here. For the purposes of this article, we are mostly concerned about the corrective A-B-C periods, as these points mark the levels where the trend will either resume or begin to fail. A-B-C patterns do not require prices to be trading within a constrictive range, so this allows traders to spot new instances of trend resumption when a Triangle or sideways range is not present.

 

mbgufs.jpg

 

In a bullish scenario, we would want to see a structure similar to what is pictured above. Prices begin to correct to the downside after an uptrend, hitting point A before rising to a lower high at point B. Prices than fall below point A to carve out new support zones at point C. This is the critical area, however, as we will need to see prices turn upward here in order to confirm that the broader uptrend is still in place. If this does not occur, avoid new long entries. If prices break above the B point, the correction has ended and the uptrend should resume. Conservative traders might wish to wait before the highest high is broken in order to confirm long position entries. More aggressive traders will enter after the B point is broken, as this signals the downside move was only a short term correction. Here, the conservative trader would receive more confirmation before entering the trade. The aggressive trader would be able to capitalize on a better (lower) price level.

 

e7jfc1.png

 

As with any strategy, these ideas can be combined and in the chart above we can see an example of prices hitting the C point in a corrective Elliott wave move just as prices have also completed a 50% retracement of the original uptrend. A bounce out a zone like this creates a highly bullish scenario as you are receiving multiple signals that are all in agreement. So, while most of the examples above are bullish, the same rules apply when downtrends are seen (just in reverse). In all of these cases, traders can use the market’s information as a way of assessing whether or not the broader trend has completed. These events can form the basis of a new bias for trade positioning.

uptrends.jpg.130894b57393fd6581022370dd785dc6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

or apply a very simple idea....

 

if your odds of picking a top/bottom in a trend and getting the exact reversal point are very low, then

the odds of not picking the top/bottom in a trend while trading with the trend are very high.

 

No matter how you measure a trend - odds are high you will not buy at the top or sell at the bottom. So to a large extent worrying about if the trend is reversed is irrelevant.

..................

One problem is always that many day traders focus on the smaller trends within a larger trend and hence never really get a chance to participate in the larger trend constantly getting chopped out which goes to the issue for most short term traders that they should be focusing on - is it ready to resume?

How then can I participate, but hang on for longer than a day with little risk in order to participate in the dominant trend?

 

Not being able to ride the main trend is always going to be an issue, and while there is nothing wrong with trading counter trend if you are good at it.....my guess is many are not and they waste focus and time trying to pick tops and bottoms intraday without thinking about where they are within the dominant trend

Richard offers some good simple ideas to use to determine if a trend may have changed......but given its probably irrelevant to most short term traders you may as well keep it simple.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dear Uncle F* Siuya - I agree that daytraders are focused on the intraday trends rather than the larger trends. As I'm sure you know, part of that focus comes down to wanting to combine the effects of leverage and frequency to enhance gains. As a daytrader that tries to utilize the big picture within my trade ideas, I have at times missed fought great intraday trends as I'm trying to get into the big picture trends. When this happens, I start to question how much value the big picture has in day trading and maybe its best just to focus on reading the flow. After all, if one could read the general intraday sentiment then they would align with the big picture when the time was right. All sounds good, but I so far, have failed to find a way to stay in alignment with the current intraday sentiment in a timely manner. I still explore though.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MK,

yes its a dilemma.

I guess there are a number of options available.

1) ignore the larger trend - focus only on what you see in the day. Have some rule that helps you determine the order flow for the day.

...very hard to do and chop will likely get you as well as indecision (unless its automated) as you are likely to have no point of reference.

 

2) go only one way. eg; say in a simplistic manner. its an up/down trend. So I will only take longs/shorts --- you might reverse this is you feel say in an uptrend it consists of large overnight gaps ups and grinding down days.

 

3) work out where you are in a longer term trend and adjust focus to try and accommodate trades based on expectations of this.

 

4) go both ways - be a genius and make plenty (or get chopped with indecision, doubt and be proved right but actually loose money)....I suspect this happens to many folks.

 

Ultimately as you point out MK, finding the way to stay aligned is difficult.

Personally I find that the easiest solution is to either wait and wait and wait for the right days and go harder at it. You might get chopped a few times, keep the losses small gut the rewards still pay off - so long as you are not hoping to do this every day.

or

look for where the best opportunities across a number of instruments that are trending (and hence likely to continue that direction) and apply the same above logic.

(This is all assuming you are not holding overnight)

 

Controversy corner - I quite like TRO (rat, maze - drain the banks) and the simplicity he offers. Determine a direction to trade (based on stats), wait for a simple area of opportunity (within 20 tics of the current high/low), apply a simple entry and exit technique (red green red etc, and 10 tic stop), use discretion as to when the actual high/low is relevant (the discretionary part which still causes the problem and cant be replicated by automation). Hence the only real focus and training required is - how can i improve my discretionary element of looking for when to apply this.

 

///////////////////////

(As you mention leverage is a positive for a day trader, but I feel frequency is more often not a positive. It raises an interesting point as a thread itself - which is more inappropriately applied by failing day traders - frequency of trades, or over leverage.

As I am not a fan of the idea of an 'edge' as its commonly referred to for day traders as opposed to a real 'edge' for arbitragers, markets makers and such I probably side on the idea of less frequency is better.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.