Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Has the Trend Reversed? Or It is Ready to Resume? 3 Strategies to Know the Difference

Recommended Posts

Has the Trend Reversed? Or It is Ready to Resume? 3 Strategies to Know the Difference

 

A wide variety of studies show that forex markets tend to operate in a trending fashion more than other classes (such as stocks or commodities). The reason for this comes from the fact that valuations in currencies are most closely tied to the broadest macroeconomic factors -- on both the national and global levels. These factors have less of an impact on assets like specific stocks. So for those that spend most of their time trading forex, trend analysis becomes much more important in determining your ability to generate consistent gains.

 

The key questions for any trend-based trade center around the assessment of its cyclical position:

 

  • Is an old trend ending?
  • Is a new trend beginning?
  • Is the trend in need of a correction (an oppositional move toward historical averages)?
  • Is the previously established trend ready to resume after a correction has completed?

 

Inaccurate to these questions result in losing positions. This means you will buy into an uptrend that is ready to reverse, sell a downtrend just before it begins making an upside correction, etc. There are many potential scenarios that could result in losing positions.

So the real work when basing your decisions on trends comes from your work in determining which stage the trend has reached in its overall life cycle. This is obviously a broad topic, so the scope of this article will focus on one potential scenario, asking the question: Is the previous trend ready to resume? When an established trend is ready to resume, high probability positions can be taken and it becomes possible to capitalize on the underlying momentum that is present in the market. Here are three types of market events to watch.

 

Understanding Corrections

 

wvq1hv.jpg

 

First, we must have an understanding of what a market correction looks like. This is the scenario that will need to complete before the trend can resume. In the first chart example, we can see a series of relatively minor downside corrections within a broader uptrend (shown as red arrows). “Market corrections are essential, because no asset can rise or fall indefinitely,” said Sam Kikla, markets analyst at BestCredit. “The market needs an opportunity to ‘take a breath’ and return to its historical averages in order to generate fresh momentum for prices to continue further.” These corrections allow traders to re-enter the market and establish new positions. These new positions are what enable valuations to continue higher or lower.

 

Fibonacci Levels Validated

 

The first chart example shows price corrections that are relatively random in nature. They are all of varying degree and follow no predictable sequence. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this, and this is the way most corrections will unfold as you are watching the trend. But when we add Fibonacci retracements to the equation, we can start to quantify the price lengths that will mark the smaller correction within the larger trend. I will not go into the intricacies of Fibonacci but I have written about some of these previously here. The most commonly watched areas when Fibonacci zones are plotted can be found at the 38.2%, 50%, and 61.8% retracements of the larger move.

 

6iqope.png

 

These levels are used to plot potential points of support (for uptrends) and resistance (for downtrends). In the chart example above, we can see the 38.2% Fibonacci level act as resistance in a broader downtrend. If this level did not hold, it would be a short-term indication that the downtrend could be over -- and traders would then begin to target larger corrections back into the 50% and 61.8% Fib levels (at least). In the example below, the 38.2% retracement does hold, and this then places the focus back on the previous lows that marked the measured move in the downside Fibonacci wave. Aggressive traders could have entered into short positions once prices started to fail at the 38.2% retracement. More conservative traders might want to wait until the longer term support level to break before committing to a position. In both cases, we have signals that the longer term trend is resuming.

 

Consolidation Breakouts: Triangles and Ranges

 

Consolidation Breakouts in the direction of the previous trend mark the second way of determining whether or not the previous trend is in place. Consolidation points are essentially periods of indecision in the market. There is not enough available information for the majority of traders to be swayed in one direction or another. But these periods cannot last forever. When consolidation patterns eventually do break, the break tends to be forceful and decisive. The market has likely received the information it wanted and now prices are ready to make a strong move. When this happens in the direction of the original trend, the signal is more valid as it is supported by the already established momentum of the prior trend.

 

v2ydfr.gif

 

In the example above, we can see that an uptrend has established itself with a strong series of higher highs. This is followed by a period of sideways consolidation that is marked by a decreasing range of constricting support and resistance levels. This gives us the Triangle formation that will be important in determining whether or not the original uptrend will be able to continue. In this example, the breakout is to the upside, and this would be an indication that long positions can still be taken as a way of capitalizing on the broader trend.

 

11792qh.jpg

 

Next, we look at range-bound conditions, where the support and resistance levels are not constricting and sideways trading dominates. Breakouts from these patterns tend to be less forceful. This is because a greater tightening of market energy is required to form a triangle but these are important patterns to watch nonetheless. The chart above shows another bullish scenario, where prices enter the range from the bottom (in an uptrend). Prices test both sides of the range multiple times before breaking to the upside. This confirms that the original bullish trend is still in place and that long positions can still be established.

 

Elliott Wave Completions

 

For those unfamiliar with the basics of Elliott Wave patterns, I have written previously about the main structures here and here. For the purposes of this article, we are mostly concerned about the corrective A-B-C periods, as these points mark the levels where the trend will either resume or begin to fail. A-B-C patterns do not require prices to be trading within a constrictive range, so this allows traders to spot new instances of trend resumption when a Triangle or sideways range is not present.

 

mbgufs.jpg

 

In a bullish scenario, we would want to see a structure similar to what is pictured above. Prices begin to correct to the downside after an uptrend, hitting point A before rising to a lower high at point B. Prices than fall below point A to carve out new support zones at point C. This is the critical area, however, as we will need to see prices turn upward here in order to confirm that the broader uptrend is still in place. If this does not occur, avoid new long entries. If prices break above the B point, the correction has ended and the uptrend should resume. Conservative traders might wish to wait before the highest high is broken in order to confirm long position entries. More aggressive traders will enter after the B point is broken, as this signals the downside move was only a short term correction. Here, the conservative trader would receive more confirmation before entering the trade. The aggressive trader would be able to capitalize on a better (lower) price level.

 

e7jfc1.png

 

As with any strategy, these ideas can be combined and in the chart above we can see an example of prices hitting the C point in a corrective Elliott wave move just as prices have also completed a 50% retracement of the original uptrend. A bounce out a zone like this creates a highly bullish scenario as you are receiving multiple signals that are all in agreement. So, while most of the examples above are bullish, the same rules apply when downtrends are seen (just in reverse). In all of these cases, traders can use the market’s information as a way of assessing whether or not the broader trend has completed. These events can form the basis of a new bias for trade positioning.

uptrends.jpg.130894b57393fd6581022370dd785dc6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

or apply a very simple idea....

 

if your odds of picking a top/bottom in a trend and getting the exact reversal point are very low, then

the odds of not picking the top/bottom in a trend while trading with the trend are very high.

 

No matter how you measure a trend - odds are high you will not buy at the top or sell at the bottom. So to a large extent worrying about if the trend is reversed is irrelevant.

..................

One problem is always that many day traders focus on the smaller trends within a larger trend and hence never really get a chance to participate in the larger trend constantly getting chopped out which goes to the issue for most short term traders that they should be focusing on - is it ready to resume?

How then can I participate, but hang on for longer than a day with little risk in order to participate in the dominant trend?

 

Not being able to ride the main trend is always going to be an issue, and while there is nothing wrong with trading counter trend if you are good at it.....my guess is many are not and they waste focus and time trying to pick tops and bottoms intraday without thinking about where they are within the dominant trend

Richard offers some good simple ideas to use to determine if a trend may have changed......but given its probably irrelevant to most short term traders you may as well keep it simple.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dear Uncle F* Siuya - I agree that daytraders are focused on the intraday trends rather than the larger trends. As I'm sure you know, part of that focus comes down to wanting to combine the effects of leverage and frequency to enhance gains. As a daytrader that tries to utilize the big picture within my trade ideas, I have at times missed fought great intraday trends as I'm trying to get into the big picture trends. When this happens, I start to question how much value the big picture has in day trading and maybe its best just to focus on reading the flow. After all, if one could read the general intraday sentiment then they would align with the big picture when the time was right. All sounds good, but I so far, have failed to find a way to stay in alignment with the current intraday sentiment in a timely manner. I still explore though.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MK,

yes its a dilemma.

I guess there are a number of options available.

1) ignore the larger trend - focus only on what you see in the day. Have some rule that helps you determine the order flow for the day.

...very hard to do and chop will likely get you as well as indecision (unless its automated) as you are likely to have no point of reference.

 

2) go only one way. eg; say in a simplistic manner. its an up/down trend. So I will only take longs/shorts --- you might reverse this is you feel say in an uptrend it consists of large overnight gaps ups and grinding down days.

 

3) work out where you are in a longer term trend and adjust focus to try and accommodate trades based on expectations of this.

 

4) go both ways - be a genius and make plenty (or get chopped with indecision, doubt and be proved right but actually loose money)....I suspect this happens to many folks.

 

Ultimately as you point out MK, finding the way to stay aligned is difficult.

Personally I find that the easiest solution is to either wait and wait and wait for the right days and go harder at it. You might get chopped a few times, keep the losses small gut the rewards still pay off - so long as you are not hoping to do this every day.

or

look for where the best opportunities across a number of instruments that are trending (and hence likely to continue that direction) and apply the same above logic.

(This is all assuming you are not holding overnight)

 

Controversy corner - I quite like TRO (rat, maze - drain the banks) and the simplicity he offers. Determine a direction to trade (based on stats), wait for a simple area of opportunity (within 20 tics of the current high/low), apply a simple entry and exit technique (red green red etc, and 10 tic stop), use discretion as to when the actual high/low is relevant (the discretionary part which still causes the problem and cant be replicated by automation). Hence the only real focus and training required is - how can i improve my discretionary element of looking for when to apply this.

 

///////////////////////

(As you mention leverage is a positive for a day trader, but I feel frequency is more often not a positive. It raises an interesting point as a thread itself - which is more inappropriately applied by failing day traders - frequency of trades, or over leverage.

As I am not a fan of the idea of an 'edge' as its commonly referred to for day traders as opposed to a real 'edge' for arbitragers, markets makers and such I probably side on the idea of less frequency is better.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.