Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Bfbusa

Trading Size

Recommended Posts

Here is something that has been rolling around in my head for some time.

 

We always hear that we should always trade a size ( number of contracts) that we feel comfortable with. Which really translates into how much are we willing to lose on a given trade, so we keep trading and we keep losing because we a comfortable.

 

Think to yourself, if you had twice or three times your normal size, I bet you would be darn well sure that the setup you take is the highest probability in your arsenal. You may find yourself not over trading and being alot more disciplined. (Of course you must have a solid trading plan and good setups first.)

 

Crazy, I know, it flies in the face of what we are taught to do as Traders.

 

So think about it for a second.

 

And Let The Debate Begin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting post bf. Good points. Assuming you are confident enough to trade your methodology w/o hesitation, there is a strong argument to trade larger that's for sure. Now, here are the 'assumptions':

  • You know your system makes money.
  • You have tested, tested and tested just to make sure your analysis is correct.
  • You can execute w/o hesitation.
  • You can leave the emotions out of this. Probably the hardest one if you increase your size.
  • And lastly - you are 100% confident in your system!!!

Assuming all of that, I could agree with increasing size to bring your focus in even more and increase your returns quicker as well. More money is always a good thing.

 

I would also add to the mix - if you can operate under these conditions, there's really no need to keep much extra cash in your account. Since futures brokers don't pay interest on cash (unless you put in T-bills), the argument here could be to keep that excess cash in something more liquid that pays you something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also, emotions aside (which are a big reason not to increase size), even a cursory understanding of game theory/probability shows that larger size EXPONENTIALLY increases risk of ruin.

 

iow (it depends on expectancy of your methodology but generally speaking), doubling your size can result in FAR more than a doubling of the risk of ruin.

 

i look at it this way. size is something you EARN. just cause you have a 100k account does not mean you should trade 50 dow contracts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Volume should not change your feelings... you have to be equally responsable and commited if you trade 1 or 50 contracts, if the correct actitude, trading more contracts is just a matter of money management... feels the same like when you started with 1 contract.... you need a decent aproach, clear and easy.... plus discipline and optimism, specially when you get stoped, have a good RRR embeded on your aproach, the rest is story... no matter how many contracts.... on my experience, trading more contracts was obviously a sintom that my trading aproach was correct, giving me more confidence on my career... but it did not make me dissy or less responsable.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is you should be pulling the trigger to get in and get out almost without thinking. The more you have on the line the less likely you are to be able to do this. Whether your base unit it is one lot or one hundred lots you should folow the system in the exact same way if you do not you should probably stop until you figure out why not.

 

Think of the largest drawdown you have had recently. It is quite likely to be 5 or maybe more losers in a row (depending on what sort of % winners : %losers your aproach has). If that string of losers produced 3 times the drawdown how would you feel? Confident and ready to pull the trigger unemotionaly on the next trade?

 

I recently opened a spread bet account (essentialy allowes you to bet on the underlying market) this allows me to bet $1 a tic essentialy. Funily enough I still make the same emotional errors (closing way too soon) even though the amount is fairly negligible. I know this perhaps lends wieght to your argument :) However I think the real problem is my fear is of being wrong rather than loosing cash!

 

Try the oposite bet small size on a low value instrument until you can get in and out without any emotional pangs at all!

 

And as was said before really know and understand the risk of ruin. I always am surprised how likely it is even with a reasonably positive system if you use too great a size.

 

Its a risky gambit - literally!!

 

Cheers,

Nick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to trade the whole session.

 

Then I did the statistics and found a pattern when I had the best trades. It was really clear. Now I trade ONLY during those windows. And I trade 5 times the size doing fewer trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Momentum sounds like you have found a trade that has a much higher chance of winning and so increased size acordingly. I wonder how much you put at risk on each trade is that 5 times as much?

 

If you can get up above 65% even towards 70% the risk of ruin starts to drop fast. That one of the reasons I would perconaly prefer a 70% method that uses a 1:1 RR.

 

The OP is saying (if I read it right) that if he trades larger size he will find higher percentage trades. You have found a higher percentage trade and so are trading larger. There is a subtle (and imho important :)) difference.

 

Cheers,

Nick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot trade successfully unless I have a high percentage win rate - more than 80%. I am unsuited to any other way of trading. The only way I can then earn enough is to trade size on "sure" setups. Each time you trade, you take on risk. So I only risk when the odds are surely strongly in my favour. So I maximise my earning by trading confidently on those "sure" setups. Works for me but may not work for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Momentom thats a far far more comfortable way of trading imho also. It must be very hard to use 'traditional' trend following methods (the turtles method springs to mind). I believe that though profitable (in large due to fairly aggresively adding contracts to winning trades) it had somethin close to 70% losing trades. Sounds like you would not have made a very good turtle :) I am pretty sure I woud have strugled.

 

As an aside the youngest (and apparently most succesful of the turtles) has written a book. Way of the Turtle: The Secret Methods that Turned Ordinary People into Legendary Traders. I hear its a good read if you like acounts of traders and trading (rather than looking for some 'secret' trading method).

 

Of course "whatever works for you" is the sound bite of the day. If you do try Bfbusa it would be interesting to hear how you got on. Just be careful out there :).

 

Having got the cliche paragraph out the way, might I ask Momentom roughly what your risk reward ratio tends to pan out at?

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

If you always wanted to know why 95% of futures traders are losers....overtrading and oversizing.

 

Since we are all humans, psychology plays into how we act and react too good and bad trades alike.

 

When you reach your daily trading goal, stop trading. The markets will be around the next business day to do it again.

 

Bad trades can temp you to increase your position to "catch up". Don't do it. Stay the course. If you get 3 or more losers in a row on the same trading day, stop.

 

Simple enough, but it'll keep you in the game with a level head long enough to actually make some $$$ after awhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you always wanted to know why 95% of futures traders are losers....overtrading and oversizing.

 

Since we are all humans, psychology plays into how we act and react too good and bad trades alike.

 

When you reach your daily trading goal, stop trading. The markets will be around the next business day to do it again.

 

Bad trades can temp you to increase your position to "catch up". Don't do it. Stay the course. If you get 3 or more losers in a row on the same trading day, stop.

 

Simple enough, but it'll keep you in the game with a level head long enough to actually make some $$$ after awhile.

 

 

Hi Cooter, you know I am actually using daily targets too and I am enjoying this money managment method, it helps you to stay out of overtrading and you walk out with a nice decent fixed dollar amount every day... helps a lot.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Hi Cooter, you know I am actually using daily targets too and I am enjoying this money managment method, it helps you to stay out of overtrading and you walk out with a nice decent fixed dollar amount every day... helps a lot.... cheers Walter.

 

Exactly, me too. But some would have you believe that you MUST take every valid trade, every time you see it. Sounds like broker talk to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having got the cliche paragraph out the way, might I ask Momentom roughly what your risk reward ratio tends to pan out at?

 

Cheers.

 

My initial stop loss is a drop dead stop loss and is about 2 x my expected initial minimum profit target. Having said that. The "possible" profit target is more than 3X my risk.

 

Once the trade is on, I manage it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly, me too. But some would have you believe that you MUST take every valid trade, every time you see it. Sounds like broker talk to me.

 

I guess I must be a futures broker in disguise then! :p

 

I think the 'take $X dollars per day' talk is great when you are new to trading. That makes sense.

 

However, as you get more experienced and understand that you must strike while the iron is hot, you will see the error in thinking like that your entire trading career.

 

Simply - no trader knows when their setups will occur, when they will work, when they will fail. Knowing that information, you MUST capitalize when your setups are working. As I stated earlier, one day can literally make your month and to say 'No Thanks, I've made enough today' can be very destructive over time.

 

I think too many traders, esp those new to trading, are way to quick to stop when they make a little money and way too willing to keep trading when they are having a rough day. That's a losing proposition no matter how you slice it up.

 

Another way to think about this is to first categorize yourself as a trend trader, counter-trend trader and/or chop trader. Most are one of those three. Since we have NO IDEA going into the day what type of day we will see, you have to capitalize when it's 'your' kind of day. Personally, I need volatilty. I need movements. When the market is chopping around, I'm probably going to lose/break-even that day. On days when the market is really moving, for me to walk away after my first trade provides a nice profit is simply ridiculous and in my opinion a very amateur type move. There can be days where an ENTIRE day can provide NUMEROUS PROFITABLE setups. To just pass on those for no reason, other than b/c you are afraid of losing the money you made, is more destructive than you guys are realizing here. I don't know... perhaps you've never had a day where you made so much money that you could not believe what your P&L was at. And until you do, this will sound like 'broker' talk, but I think it's quite the contrary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brown : when the day has momentum (very few) Oh Yes ¡¡ I do stay inside with some runners... now on chopy (most of them ) I try to make my day, originally I was on $60 per day contract... now I am on $100 per day contract... on a momentum day normally I exceed the $250 per contract... and yes its more the scalper mentality.... but believe me it pays the bills jejeje... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought of another way to explain -

 

It's often said that in order to make money trading, you must have an 'edge'. Assuming that is correct and assuming you are not sure when your edge will in fact be an edge, how can you stop trading your edge b/c of some arbitrary dollar gain? The market does not care if you hit your goal for the day.

 

How many days have you looked at in hindsight and said 'WOW, I would have made a KILLING trading my edge all day!'. Well, if you simply stopped after one trade, that 'killing' is purely a dream.

 

I suppose I am of the belief that you have to take the money when it's their for you b/c there will be plenty of times when the well is 'dry'. That does not necessarily mean you are losing, but let's be realistic - there are plenty of days that not many traders get excited about due to the lack of movements, volume, etc. I would prefer to be in the game when things are moving around and make my money knowing full well there will be times when there just isn't many trades and/or profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Brown : when the day has momentum (very few) Oh Yes ¡¡ I do stay inside with some runners... now on chopy (most of them ) I try to make my day, originally I was on $60 per day contract... now I am on $100 per day contract... on a momentum day normally I exceed the $250 per contract... and yes its more the scalper mentality.... but believe me it pays the bills jejeje... cheers Walter.

 

 

Since you trade the ER2, Walter, that was 6 ticks initially, right? Now your target is 1 full point, and sometimes 2.5 points on the Russell on a high momentum day. Not bad, indeed.

 

Just curious, what is your downside limit? When do you say "no mas" to your losers and call it a day?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brown : when the day has momentum (very few) Oh Yes ¡¡ I do stay inside with some runners... now on chopy (most of them ) I try to make my day, originally I was on $60 per day contract... now I am on $100 per day contract... on a momentum day normally I exceed the $250 per contract... and yes its more the scalper mentality.... but believe me it pays the bills jejeje... cheers Walter.

 

Walter - I think it first depends on how you define 'momentum' as I personally think there's plenty of momentum most days. We don't know when that momentum will show up and it may only show up for a few minutes or a few hours, but I do know that when it shows, I need to be in my trades. For example, there can be some great momentum before/during/after econ news and if you can trade during these times, it can provide great opportunities in a very short period of time. It might only last for a few minutes, but there's some serious money exchanging hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just curious, what is your downside limit? When do you say "no mas" to your losers and call it a day?

 

Cooter - you took the question right of my mouth. Walter, what's your daily max pain setting? Cooter, same question to you as well.

 

Where do you guys say enough pain and stop trading for the day?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brown : when the day has momentum (very few) Oh Yes ¡¡ I do stay inside with some runners... now on chopy (most of them ) I try to make my day, originally I was on $60 per day contract... now I am on $100 per day contract... on a momentum day normally I exceed the $250 per contract... and yes its more the scalper mentality.... but believe me it pays the bills jejeje... cheers Walter.

 

Walter - another question if I may - if your goal is $100/ct and done, how are you sticking around for the $250/ct days? Do you arbitrarily decide to let trades run for the sake of letting them run? To make $250/ct, you are violating your daily goal rule. I'm wondering how one makes the distinction of stopping at $100 or going for that $250, which is more than double your initial goal for the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised no one has brought up the issue of position sizing with regard to type of setup. I have about 5 setups I play that range from high probability to extremely high probability. My contract size will be completely dependent on the setup at hand.

 

In my opinion it is disadvantageous to initiate a set number of contracts across a series of day types (low volume/high volume, trending/ranging etc.) and trade setups.

 

For instance capitulation volume into an area of support that formed a very bullish candle pattern would warrant a high number of contracts. On the other hand a counter-trend profit taking scalp would warrant a much smaller position size (due to the lesser degree of probability).

 

What also makes a very big difference is whether you are trading off of market structure or your P/L. If you trade (focus on) your P/L you will exit too soon, if you trade off market structure the contract size does not matter.

 

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul - we had this discussion in another thread awhile ago and myself and few others made the argument that if you have an array of probability trades, why bother with anything other than the most highly probable of producing profits and simply trade large size on these gems?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
I thought of another way to explain -

 

It's often said that in order to make money trading, you must have an 'edge'. Assuming that is correct and assuming you are not sure when your edge will in fact be an edge, how can you stop trading your edge b/c of some arbitrary dollar gain? The market does not care if you hit your goal for the day.

 

Exactly. But YOU do, right?

 

Card counters at a casino are said to have an edge, too. But they can't follow their valid setups indefinitely for fear that the casino will shut them down. Just get a reasonable amount, and leave the table, so you can make a go at it again the next day.

 

Same thing here.

 

You take your valid setups and make your money until you reach your goal, if possible. Valid as your setups may be, it's still called trading for a reason.

 

Unless you can detach your emotions from the execution of your trading strategy, your previous success or failure while you're in a trading session could impart a subtle influence upon whether you properly interpret and apply your strategy correctly.

 

If you are saying that you have the "balls of steel" in order to trade like an automation, then your approach has merit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly. But YOU do, right?

 

Card counters at a casino are said to have an edge, too. But they can't follow their valid setups indefinitely for fear that the casino will shut them down. Just get a reasonable amount, and leave the table, so you can make a go at it again the next day.

 

Same thing here.

 

You take your valid setups and make your money until you reach your goal, if possible. Valid as your setups may be, it's still called trading for a reason.

 

Unless you can detach your emotions from the execution of your trading strategy, your previous success or failure while you're in a trading session could impart a subtle influence upon whether you properly interpret and apply your strategy correctly.

 

If you are saying that you have the "balls of steel" in order to trade like an automation, then your approach has merit.

 

I really don't see the correlation between a card counter that can be shut down and a trader that makes money. The CME is not going to call you up one day and tell you that you made too much recently and you are now banned from trading. Nor will the NYSE, CBOT, etc. I understand that FX is a different story.

 

So, really the point you are trying to make Cooter is that since many traders cannot detach their emotions from practical trading mechanics, you must shut yourself off at some point - good or bad. And in theory, I get that.

 

If your edge is truly an edge, then I believe you must exploit it each AND every time it appears b/c you have no idea going into the trade if this will be a winner or not. Since obtaining a 100% win ratio is not likely, you cannot omit any winning trades or your winning % will be drastically skewed.

 

In the end, we are all playing a numbers game here. Going into a trade setup, we know that this has a X% chance of producing a profit. We know that there's no way to be correct all the time, so you better be in the trade when your winners do show up. And if 5 winners show up in one day, you better capture that profit b/c tomorrow is a brand new day and once again, we have no idea what the day holds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

 

So, really the point you are trying to make Cooter is that since many traders cannot detach their emotions from practical trading mechanics, you must shut yourself off at some point - good or bad. And in theory, I get that.

 

Glad to hear that.

 

However, theory is your emotions NOT playing some role in the application of your trading strategy; reality is realizing that there is some psychological component to the proper and profitable recognition and execution of our valid setups and adjusting accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.