Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Trading the 1-2-3 Reversal

Recommended Posts

Trading the 1-2-3 Reversal

 

Getting the best price on your trades (whether they are long or short positions) will generally depend on your ability to spot reversals in trends. Markets tend to work in extremes, as the “dumb money” tends to pile onto trend momentum when it is ready to reach its exhaustion point. This final push that is driven by traders that are late to the party should be viewed as an opportunity, however, as this creates excellent opportunities for those looking to establish contrarian positions. The key word here is “reversal,” as this suggests that prices have become too cheap or too expensive and are ready to change course.

 

Those that can spot the earliest signals in these changes are the traders that will be able to best capitalize on the new trends that come next. There are many ways of assessing when a trend has run its course. For example, some traders might look at an indicator like the Average True Range. This tool gives us a sense of how far (in pips) a currency pair is likely to travel over a given period. Once this range is exhausted, it is unlikely that prices will be able to travel further. Other common strategies can be seen in overbought/oversold indicators (such as the Relative Strength Index), which signals instances where prices have deviated too far from their historical tendencies. For candlestick traders, there is a three-candle reversal pattern that is often referred to either as an evening star (for sell signals) or a morning star for (buy signals). The basic rules for these structures can be found below.

 

Evening Stars - Essential Criteria for Sell Signals:

 

v7bf9h.png

  • The second price bar posts a higher low, and higher high when compared to the first and third price bar.
  • The first price bar is bullish (posting a higher close, relative to the open)
  • The third price bar is bearish (posting a lower close, relative to the open)

 

Morning Stars - Essential Criteria for Buy Signals:

 

rbzfh5.png

  • The second price bar posts a lower low, and lower high when compared to the first and third price bar.
  • The first price bar is bearish (posting a lower close, relative to the open)
  • The third price bar is bullish (posting a higher close, relative to the open)

 

The 1-2-3 Reversal Defined

 

For those that like to focus more on price activity itself, we can look at a longer term variation of the candlestick reversals shown above. Here, we will look at the 1-2-3 reversal pattern, which presents a stable price structure that is easy to identify. The basic 1-2-3 reversal is composed of two simple price structures but there are many variations that can be identified depending on how market activity unfolds prior to and as the reversal pattern is progressing. Next, we look at the basic criteria for the buy and sell signals, using the 1-2-3 reversal pattern.

 

First, it is important to view the 1-2-3 reversal for what it is: The end of an old trend and the emergence of a new price direction. Once an extreme market move has taken place (bearish or bullish), prices will then retrace the previous move with a larger-than-normal price length. In the next charted example, we can see that prices push lower, and find a bottom at point 1. Prices then correct in an upward fashion, finding initial resistance at point 2. After some downward stalling, prices then break the short term resistance level defined by point 2, and surge higher (this is the larger-than-expected retracement). It is important to note, however, that the pattern only remains valid if a higher low is established at point 3. If support at point 1 is re-tested, you are not seeing a 1-2-3 reversal. Breakout buy positions can be taken once resistance at point 2 is violated.

 

15rzkwi.png

 

In a downtrend, we would not typically expect to see breaks of important resistance levels, and this is the first indication that the original downtrend has completed. In an uptrend, the reverse would be seen, as prices would begin breaking closely-watched support levels, without re-testing upside resistance at point 1. This can be seen in the structure shown below. Breakout sell positions could be taken once prices violate support defined by point 2. In both cases, stop loss levels could then be defined by the support/resistance levels at point 3.

 

350quz9.png

 

Live Chart Examples

 

Now that we can see the “bare bones” structure, lets look at some live chart examples. The first step in the process is to determine the overriding trend, and then draw a trendline to define that trend. In a downtrend, we start from the swing high (labeled C in the chart below) and continue to the price low (labeled A). Once this trendline breaks to the topside, we can identify point 1 (which is the trend low), and the price pattern has now started.

 

2hoh3jd.png

 

The live chart below shows a defined downtrend, a corrective reversal at point 1, a small downward move to point 2, and finally a break of point 1 resistance, which is the move that defines point 3. Buy orders can be set above resistance (the new higher high at point 1), which stop losses set below point 2.

 

1zi6b8.png

 

Reversals in Uptrends

 

Next, we look at reversals in uptrends that present opportunities for short positions. We first must define the uptrend with a upward trendline (starting at C and ending at A in the graphic below). Once prices fall below the upward trendline, we have our origination area at point 1. The reversal has now begun.

 

2w3dv0p.png

 

The live chart below shows a defined uptrend, a corrective reversal at point 1, a small upward move to point 2, and finally a break of point 1 support, which is the move that defines point 3. Sell orders can be set below support (the new lower low at point 1), which stop losses set above point 2.

 

152yu84.png

 

Conclusion: The 1-2-3 Strategy Allows Traders to Bet Against the Dominant Trend as it Ends

 

In these articles, I often about the commonly used market maxim “the trend is your friend, ride it until it ends.” To be sure, this little gem holds a great deal of wisdom that can be used to capitalize on the market’s overriding momentum in a way that is easy to spot on your price charts. But we must also remember that trends cannot continue forever, and if we can spot instances where a trend has exhausted itself, there are some excellent opportunities to get into the new trend at highly favorable levels.

 

There are many different ways to determine whether or not a trend has completed. Some of the most common techniques involve the implementation of tools like the ATR, RSI, or candlestick patterns. The 1-2-3 reversal pattern offers something of a variation on these techniques and should be viewed as preferable for those that prefer to place most of their focus on price action itself. There is no rule that says some of these strategies cannot be used in combination, however. So, for example, if we were to see a bullish 1-2-3 reversal pattern as prices have fallen into oversold territory on the RSI and prices have reached the lower end of their projected range using an ATR indicator, we would essentially have a “perfect storm” scenario for new buy positions in your currency pair.

download.jpg.774048b50de740968539af89483b3df6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  RichardCox said:
Hi, thanks for the comments. If there are specific topics you are interested in, let me know and maybe we can cover them.

 

hi Richard,

 

you're one of he main and most important contributors here so thank you

 

I would really appreciate a topic about fractals

 

a real one

 

thanks

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.