Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MichelGJulien

Official Launch of My Crude Oil Trading Room This Monday Nov. 4th

Recommended Posts

I didn't have time to tweet or trade today because I was sooooo busy with all the settings one has to take care of in order to setup a decent trading room. There are many bells and whistles to get acquainted with it and I must admit it will take some getting used to on my part before I feel 100% comfortable using all the options offered by my software provider Cisco/WebEx. Today, I had to make some decisions about what charts to share with my attendees (can't use all 8 monitors for sure). Also had to make sure my charts were in a format that looks good in a webinar environment, that the sound was good, video, etc... There is a chat area, a poll function, a whiteboard and lots of other things too long (and too boring) to mention here.

 

Needless to say I am very excited at the idea of ​​having to host my first trading room session ever on Monday and I'm also a little bit nervous about it. I guess it's natural to feel that way as roughly 100 participants will log in Monday morning. I'm a perfectionist and I want everything to be... well, perfect. I just hope that the crude oil market will give us some nice and clean signals like it did today. That would help to start that new venture on the right foot. But the market is the market and we'll have to cope with whatever it throws at us Monday at the sound of the bell.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37302&stc=1&d=1383346530

Bulls have started to run for the exit as the important $96 level was broken

 

Talking about the market, let's say it broke today a very important level that now opens the door to significantly lower price levels in the days/weeks to come. See you all on Monday guys. Have a nice weekend!

daily.thumb.png.c9c3104a186ac37ec516d04cc005496e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MichelGJulien said:

Talking about the market, let's say it broke today a very important level that now opens the door to significantly lower price levels in the days/weeks to come. See you all on Monday guys. Have a nice weekend!

 

Do you trade within a specific timeframe?

 

Why was 96 so important to you?

 

What is to be gained in your trading room?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Do you trade within a specific timeframe?

 

Why was 96 so important to you?

 

What is to be gained in your trading room?

 

I'm a short-term trader often holding positions for less than 30 minutes. So, although I look at the big picture, I base my decisions on short timeframes.

 

96 was (and still is) important because of the number of times price stopped on it from below as well as from above.

 

In my trading room you essentially get to copy my trades, so you get the same results than me if you follow correctly. Results are here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO

Hi

 

What stops do u use ?100 pips a week average performance is good , but are your maximum drawdowns ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MichelGJulien said:
I'm a short-term trader often holding positions for less than 30 minutes. So, although I look at the big picture, I base my decisions on short timeframes.

 

96 was (and still is) important because of the number of times price stopped on it from below as well as from above.

 

In my trading room you essentially get to copy my trades, so you get the same results than me if you follow correctly. Results are here

 

Price went right through 96. it also went right through 97, 98, 95, and etc. It (96) may have appeared to be a turning point on one or several occasions, but the market only had a casual relationship to 96. The evidence has bore a hole through your rational. It would be wiser to note the miscalculation and adapt, than to stubbornly hold precious the error.

 

You may have personally assigned importance to 96 (as in if it stays above or goes below 96, something changes) and you are free to assign importance to any thing you wish, but then you or anyone who follows you will not escape the consequences of your miscalculations in the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
  MichelGJulien said:
I'm a short-term trader often holding positions for less than 30 minutes. So, although I look at the big picture, I base my decisions on short timeframes.

 

96 was (and still is) important because of the number of times price stopped on it from below as well as from above.

 

In my trading room you essentially get to copy my trades, so you get the same results than me if you follow correctly. Results are here

 

97 looks like the main resistance which turned support , it made 4 attempts to stay above 97 and finally moved higher .It came back to 97 and held as support.96 is also valid.

Clipboard01.thumb.jpg.4687c41708202eb7afc121331f9a4860.jpg

Clipboard012.thumb.jpg.c327ec311f9a2a1d874f8ade0262e6c7.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
Price went right through 96. it also went right through 97, 98, 95, and etc. It (96) may have appeared to be a turning point on one or several occasions, but the market only had a casual relationship to 96. The evidence has bore a hole through your rational. It would be wiser to note the miscalculation and adapt, than to stubbornly hold precious the error.

 

You may have personally assigned importance to 96 (as in if it stays above or goes below 96, something changes) and you are free to assign importance to any thing you wish, but then you or anyone who follows you will not escape the consequences of your miscalculations in the market.

 

You are showing your lack of trading skills by what you are saying. Trading is not theoretical, it is practical. If you are "taking a long term position' and not trading than your point could be considered relevant. But if you are trading and you don't know what a support is then good luck to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MichelGJulien said:
You are showing your lack of trading skills by what you are saying. Trading is not theoretical, it is practical. If you are "taking a long term position' and not trading than your point could be considered relevant. But if you are trading and you don't know what a support is then good luck to you.

 

96 was not support. Don't take my word for it. Look at the price record. Yet, you stubbornly insist that 96 is support. So is it resistance now too? Is that the methodical dance of price? Novice thoughts produce novice results. Again, you can't escape the consequences of your reasoning.

 

Keep simming. It is safest place for you to be while you learn to trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MightyMouse said:
96 was not support. Don't take my word for it. Look at the price record. Yet, you stubbornly insist that 96 is support. So is it resistance now too? Is that the methodical dance of price?

 

Looking at the chart he's posted, my guess is that it's the other way around - he perceived it to be support because previously it was resistance. Until it wasn't. And isn't.

 

Hmm . . .

 

Even if you think of support as an area where participants have rejected lower prices, the questions remain - who are those participants, did they actively buy when they wouldn't buy at higher prices, or was there a dearth of passive sellers at lower prices, do they still hold positions established at those prices, and how will they react if price trades back down to them?

 

When I think of "support" I think of a massive buy-side institution with a 3 year outlook that will simply shrug and chuckle at a retest of that price, or an algorithm that is long since flat because they turned off and went home for the night.

 

If you can know (or guess with some certainty) who these participants are, their goals and limitations, then support becomes a workable concept.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Looking at the chart he's posted, my guess is that it's the other way around - he perceived it to be support because previously it was resistance. Until it wasn't. And isn't.

 

Hmm . . .

 

Even if you think of support as an area where participants have rejected lower prices, the questions remain - who are those participants, did they actively buy when they wouldn't buy at higher prices, or was there a dearth of passive sellers at lower prices, do they still hold positions established at those prices, and how will they react if price trades back down to them?

 

When I think of "support" I think of a massive buy-side institution with a 3 year outlook that will simply shrug and chuckle at a retest of that price, or an algorithm that is long since flat because they turned off and went home for the night.

 

If you can know (or guess with some certainty) who these participants are, their goals and limitations, then support becomes a workable concept.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Support is a loosely used term in trading. In the context of this thread, it is being used as a tool to act as a buyer. It's best to think of support as an after-the-fact phenomena. Where either, as you noted, buyers who wanted to be long stepped in or where short sellers decided to cover. What they did last time, may or may not influence what they do this time. And, they may or may not even be present to act one way or the other.

 

Support fails when there is an abundance of supply. No buyer who knows what he is doing will step in to buy when there is an abundance of supply waiting to dump; likewise, no short will cover if he expects more supply. He/she would rather wait to buy at lower prices. He/she (the trader who knows what they are doing) would never buy at 96 because that is where price turned last time. He/she might expect weak buyers (who we can categorize as supply and not demand since they cover quickly) to act (buy) at such a price, but if categorized correctly, the buyer will piss his pants and dump soon. Weak demand, then, is essentially future supply.

 

A weak buyer is not necessarily an unskilled trader. Weak pertains to his/her conviction to direction. An HFT fund, which holds for no more than 20 seconds can act as weak as a 1 lot trader who trades using a moving avg cross over on a 5 minute chart.

 

Frequently, just below "96" or below or above any pictorial support or resistance level, there is an excellent area to liquidate a trade in the opposite direction of the support or resistance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
  MightyMouse said:
Support is a loosely used term in trading. In the context of this thread, it is being used as a tool to act as a buyer. It's best to think of support as an after-the-fact phenomena. Where either, as you noted, buyers who wanted to be long stepped in or where short sellers decided to cover. What they did last time, may or may not influence what they do this time. And, they may or may not even be present to act one way or the other.

 

Support fails when there is an abundance of supply. No buyer who knows what he is doing will step in to buy when there is an abundance of supply waiting to dump; likewise, no short will cover if he expects more supply. He/she would rather wait to buy at lower prices. He/she (the trader who knows what they are doing) would never buy at 96 because that is where price turned last time. He/she might expect weak buyers (who we can categorize as supply and not demand since they cover quickly) to act (buy) at such a price, but if categorized correctly, the buyer will piss his pants and dump soon. Weak demand, then, is essentially future supply.

 

A weak buyer is not necessarily an unskilled trader. Weak pertains to his/her conviction to direction. An HFT fund, which holds for no more than 20 seconds can act as weak as a 1 lot trader who trades using a moving avg cross over on a 5 minute chart.

 

Frequently, just below "96" or below or above any pictorial support or resistance level, there is an excellent area to liquidate a trade in the opposite direction of the support or resistance.

 

One needs the skills to use support and resistance pofitability , beauty is in th eye of the beholder , profitable support and resistance entries are the eye and art of a successful trader.I see about 100 support and resistance entries every week , yet I only take 5 to 6 of them after reading context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  OILFXPRO said:
One needs the skills to use support and resistance pofitability , beauty is in th eye of the beholder , profitable support and resistance entries are the eye and art of a successful trader.I see about 100 support and resistance entries every week , yet I only take 5 to 6 of them after reading context.

Very nice. Wannabe vendors banding together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
  MightyMouse said:
Very nice. Wannabe vendors banding together.

 

I don't want to be a vendor , just cause you don't have a profitable skills , infact most decent traders would rather trade and make billions on 100 to 1 margin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
  MightyMouse said:
96 was not support. Don't take my word for it. Look at the price record. Yet, you stubbornly insist that 96 is support. So is it resistance now too? Is that the methodical dance of price? Novice thoughts produce novice results. Again, you can't escape the consequences of your reasoning.

 

Keep simming. It is safest place for you to be while you learn to trade.

 

Take the chip off and learn.Nice chartsin Julien's room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.