Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mentrader

Is Scalper Better Than Day Trader??

Recommended Posts

With my experience in trading & investments so far, i have come to the conclusion that long term investing in a single entity is the best thing to do...

After that its the swing trading which is good one...all the billionaires and multi-millionaires that i see today are either long term investors or longer term swing traders..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, what do you mean by scalper?

 

Assuming you mean buying at bid and selling at ask to make the spread, then there is an advantage if you can do it profitably. The advantage is that your equity curve will be made up of lots and lots of smaller gains and losses making for a much smoother ride (which has significant implications for position sizing).

 

The key concept here has been termed "expectatunity" - a portmanteau of "expectancy" and "opportunity". It is fine to have a small expectancy or edge if you have the opportunity to apply it with sufficient frequency. Think of casinos - the house edge is tiny, but as long as they get enough gamblers through the doors it stacks up to huge profits (hence all the loss-leaders like free food!).

 

In this sense, Scalping is "better" than all other trading, with the exception of true arbitrage.

 

Unfortunately true scalping, which was once the preserve of floor traders and market makers, has now become a HFT dominated game, and is therefore pretty much inaccessible to the retail trader.

 

This leaves daytrading . . . Finding profitable daytrading strategies (great entries and exits) is easy . . . finding ones that comfortably overcome costs is definitely not.

 

Regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.

 

This leaves daytrading . . . Finding profitable daytrading strategies (great entries and exits) is easy . . . finding ones that comfortably overcome costs is definitely not.

 

Regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Daytraders can still find opportunities. The flow of opportunities is very different these last few years from years past. You really need to be like an Eskimo seal hunter waiting patiently for that feather to move. If you do not, then you will expense yourself out of trading.

 

Scalpers: The theoretical advantage of being able to buy at the bid and sell at the ask certainly gave many floor traders an edge. For many traders that edge was not enough. A lot of Floor traders leveraged the relationships the developed with floor brokers who would fill orders for retail and institutional paper, giving floor traders better fills and position than they deserved. Think of the advantage of knowing (back then) that a fund wanted to liquidate 500 contracts of corn at market. Many scalpers relied more on relationships and less on their market savvy.

 

In modern times I think one needs to be naive to think that goldman sachs or any other firm who engages in brokerage and trades its own account, does not use the information that a customer provides to the customer's disadvantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daytraders can still find opportunities. The flow of opportunities is very different these last few years from years past. You really need to be like an Eskimo seal hunter waiting patiently for that feather to move. If you do not, then you will expense yourself out of trading.

 

Scalpers: The theoretical advantage of being able to buy at the bid and sell at the ask certainly gave many floor traders an edge. For many traders that edge was not enough. A lot of Floor traders leveraged the relationships the developed with floor brokers who would fill orders for retail and institutional paper, giving floor traders better fills and position than they deserved. Think of the advantage of knowing (back then) that a fund wanted to liquidate 500 contracts of corn at market. Many scalpers relied more on relationships and less on their market savvy.

 

In modern times I think one needs to be naive to think that goldman sachs or any other firm who engages in brokerage and trades its own account, does not use the information that a customer provides to the customer's disadvantage.

so.....manipulation...???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so.....manipulation...???

 

What I described, I would categorize as questionable ethics and illegal trading activities.

 

Certain markets are too big to manipulate. Other markets are easier to manipulate especially when you consider the type of demand ( elastic or inelastic) that certain commodities have. I drive by oil tanks in Connecticut leased by morgan stanley who accounts for about 50-60% of the heating oil delivered each year ( on both sides). Why is the white gloved firm of MS in the oil business?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You really need to be like an Eskimo seal hunter waiting patiently for that feather to move. If you do not, then you will expense yourself out of trading.

 

A funny coincidence - I have just been watching seals hunting emperor penguins on the 'Frozen Seas' episode of Blue Planet :)

 

If the feather doesn't move often enough though, then what's the point? If the frequency isn't higher than EOD trading, then why spend all day in front of a computer?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A funny coincidence - I have just been watching seals hunting emperor penguins on the 'Frozen Seas' episode of Blue Planet :)

 

If the feather doesn't move often enough though, then what's the point? If the frequency isn't higher than EOD trading, then why spend all day in front of a computer?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I could not agree more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the better question is what style of trading do you like best? Every trader has a certain style that they will do better at, and that is what you should be looking for. Pretty much all types of trading money can be made, but what you enjoy most will give you the most fulfillment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is this not the same thing? ...scalper = day trader?

 

TW

 

No.

 

Daytrader = anyone who holds positions for less than a day.

 

Scalper = trading to profit from the spread (difference between bid and ask, often a single tick in liquid markets).

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No.

 

Daytrader = anyone who holds positions for less than a day.

 

Scalper = trading to profit from the spread (difference between bid and ask, often a single tick in liquid markets).

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I guess it's more of a nuance......depends on your time horizon.....or maybe I am a scalper on the monthly chart :cool:

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found that most FX Brokers do not tolerate scalping, even though they say is acceptable. I tried it using an expert & I saw little success. I have to agree with the others, that day trading is more effective in the long term, provided that you're willing to take the time to analyse the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I found that most FX Brokers do not tolerate scalping, even though they say is acceptable. I tried it using an expert & I saw little success. I have to agree with the others, that day trading is more effective in the long term, provided that you're willing to take the time to analyse the markets.

 

Hello,

 

Do you mean that the broker doesn't allow scalping, or that you had little success, and would like to blame the broker rather than the method you employed?

 

If you're talking about pure scalping (buy bid, sell ask), then then the interbank spot fx market is the very last place to try and do this - you can't see any information about the order book (because there isn't one), so you have no idea how many orders are queued behind you, at what rate active participants are prepared to cross the spread etc.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

Do you mean that the broker doesn't allow scalping, or that you had little success, and would like to blame the broker rather than the method you employed?

 

If you're talking about pure scalping (buy bid, sell ask), then then the interbank spot fx market is the very last place to try and do this - you can't see any information about the order book (because there isn't one), so you have no idea how many orders are queued behind you, at what rate active participants are prepared to cross the spread etc.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I tried with an EA & it seemed I never got the price that triggered the trade, but what you mentioned above makes sense. I just avoid it now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IMO Scalping is much harder than most of the other day jobs..i better be a 9-5 employee than being a scalper..

 

Well said. I agree with that.But it is not even a question about harder or easier job. Some markets do not reward scalpers. Example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.