Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

Head and Shoulders

Recommended Posts

Head and shoulders and inversed head and shoulders patterns fall into the reversal patterns category and they are extremely common on all the time frames. So, regardless of what you are trading, currencies, indices, etc, and regardless of the time frame you are looking at (hourly, 4hours, daily, even higher time frames), head and shoulders and inversed head and shoulders are extremely common and should be taking into consideration as they are powerful reversal patterns.

 

The beauty of such a pattern is that it is extremely visible and it is coming with a measured move.

 

Like the name suggests, the head and shoulders pattern is formed by a head (which is the spike to the upside), a left and a right shoulder and a neckline. By taking the amplitude of the head (the distance price travels from the neckline to the top of the head) and projecting it by the moment the neckline is broken to the downside the result is called the measured move of the head and shoulders.

 

The opposite is true for the inversed head and shoulders pattern, basically this one being a mirroring image of the previous one. Head and shoulders are reversal patterns in uptrends, while inversed head and houlders are reversal patterns in downtrends.

 

The above represent the theory regarding the pattern, however, there are some tips and tricks to be considered when actually trading such a pattern:

 

- look for the time taken for the shoulders to form to be almost the same. This should be a confirmation that the pattern is valid. Moreover, what one can do is to take a look at the time taken for the left shoulder to consolidate (as this is the first one), measure the time taken to consoliadate and then project the respective time on the right side when the right shoulder starts, this representing an educated guess about the possible end of the right shoulder;

- drawing the neckline is a tricky thing, as most of the traders draw the neckline connenctign the highs of the candles that form the two shoulders. While this may work, a more appropriate neckline should be drawn trying to connect the bodies of the candles and trying to avoid the shadows. In this way, the measured move is smaller and the trader avoid the risk of waiting for the measured move to come and being traped waiting for the last pip/point;

- the measured move is just a target, but in order to be on the safest side look for it more in terms of price to reach 70-75% of it as this is a good enough confirmation;

- usually the neckline is retested after being broken, but this is not mandatory. Because of that, sometimes traders wait for the retesting in order to enter a trade but such a retest might not happen.

 

Below is a current audcad 4h chart and it shows a possible inversed head and shoulders pattern with all the elements discussed above.

 

Any other current head and shoulders or inversed head and shoulders pattern you might see, regardless of the time frame and the instrument traded, feel free to upload it in this thread so that we can see as many as them possbile and learn from all of them.

audcadh4tl.thumb.png.12214e1dcfd9ae376659663c79ac88f9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often realize that when a head and shoulders formation is made, the price moves against the formation, like for head & shoulders it does down afterwards and for inverted head & shoulders it goes up..

 

Probably one of the best on-chart indicator out there..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ammeo said:
I often realize that when a head and shoulders formation is made, the price moves against the formation, like for head & shoulders it does down afterwards and for inverted head & shoulders it goes up..

 

Probably one of the best on-chart indicator out there..

 

you mean after the measured move is done? ....I don't quite understand...

 

Thanks.

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mitsubishi said:
Wiz- chart in post 4 looks like a cup and handle to me.You also seem to be ignoring many H&S patterns on your charts.I don't look for these patterns but I didn't know they were "valid" when running at an angle.

Measured moves- why not look for them regardless of the pattern? A swing high to swing low is there in any case whether the pattern is there or not.

The measured move happens ...because there was a head and shoulders ...I think not.

If the trend on the higher time frame is up then from the recent low (what you call a head" and which ultimately is...the recent low.. the only undisputable fact in your thesis in fact) price will continue it's uptrend.First it will reach the recent high- you call it a shoulder...again the only fact is that it's the recent high- it will then exceed that high or the uptrend is finished.

For the measured moved to have any quantifiable edge,then price must reach the predicted target and reverse immediately somewhat from there often enough for you to believe there is something there worth testing....is that the case? The measured move can be seen because price turns at the target?

 

For me,this all looks a little bit like pseudoscience and you may as well post a link to one of the 25,659 TA sites that will show the same thing..probably for the rest of our lives.

Erase,rewind and begin the thread as if you'd never heard of a H&S...from a neutral scientific point of view rather than the perception bias you show here.

 

Compared to the science world TA has very low standards..it's actually shocking

 

hi mits, thank you for your thoughts....these kind of patterns/traits are happening especially on currency markest (that I do trade) and because of the high volatility implied sometimes they are not looking "by the book" if you know what I mean.....these are just live examples of possible (note the word) head and shoulders or inversed head and shoulders patterns......from my point of view the one the gbpnzd chart is still valid

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case of H&S patterns I could say

1. The neckline is a simple resistance line , the visibility of the shoulders and head as described by trading wizard …helps …is a kind of alarm that this resistance line may be it would be broken.

2. The measured move is o.k as described by trading wizard BUT ONE SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION the next resistance above the neck line , traders forget this.!!

In case of inversed H&S patterns the neck line is a support line and …so on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  livernik said:
In case of H&S patterns I could say

1. The neckline is a simple resistance line , the visibility of the shoulders and head as described by trading wizard …helps …is a kind of alarm that this resistance line may be it would be broken.

2. The measured move is o.k as described by trading wizard BUT ONE SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION the next resistance above the neck line , traders forget this.!!

In case of inversed H&S patterns the neck line is a support line and …so on

 

I agree....I would love for you to put a chart here with a head and shoulders and show us how u treat it

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the chart from Greek Index Ftse ase 20 , ( now ftse 25 ) period 2009

 

Support works well before the measured move.

 

The suggested 70..75 % by trading wizard IS A COMPLETE SUCCESS!!!

5aa71202c60f2_headshouldersFTSEASE20GREECE2009.JPG.7d052f4e733a675e9627c696186036eb.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  livernik said:
the chart from Greek Index Ftse ase 20 , ( now ftse 25 ) period 2009

 

Support works well before the measured move.

 

The suggested 70..75 % by trading wizard IS A COMPLETE SUCCESS!!!

 

indeed your example looks nice.......however, I do have one thing to add: head and shoulders and inversed head and shoulders are reversal patterns and they tend to follow a bullish trend (in the case of the head and shoulders) or a bearish trend ( in the case of the inversed head and shoulders)......yours here........is a bit "fishy" from that point of view.....

 

otherwise, everything seems to be respected

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tr. W : I agree it is a bit ‘’fishy’’ ‘’by the book’’, thanks for pointing this.

If you read my first post I wrote that a neckline can be seen as a support line . This gives support or is broken, retested etc.

I named it as ‘’neckline’’ as the formation above it reminds of H&S formation .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:
possible inversed head and shoulders pattern in audcad here in light of Canadian GDP and RBA cash rate decision......neckline broken, re-tested..........moving higher should begin with parity in sight

 

seems to work pretty nice, price above 0.98 now....parity here we come

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case again of FTSE _ASE 20 GREECE WEEKLY 11 10 2013

 

The first neckline , light blue colour,has a clear S-H-S formation but fails to break upwards and give the neasured move because of a resistance .The resistance'' worked ''.

Now one may consider a new ''candidate '' neckline, pink colour with the right shoulder ''under possible construction''.

5aa71203279fd_FTSE_ASE20GREECEWEEKLY11102013.JPG.50dd41e7b1fceb7f17d2f6bc119f527b.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  livernik said:
In case again of FTSE _ASE 20 GREECE WEEKLY 11 10 2013

 

The first neckline , light blue colour,has a clear S-H-S formation but fails to break upwards and give the neasured move because of a resistance .The resistance'' worked ''.

Now one may consider a new ''candidate '' neckline, pink colour with the right shoulder ''under possible construction''.

 

in your case here it seems that the time taken for the right shoulder is a bit bigger.....so might be something else.......let's say it is not the clearest example

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.