Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

Recommended Posts

  tupapa said:
Really? And what makes you think it's poised to break higher?

 

There was a clear rejection of resistance on wednesday and both yesterday and today buyers don't seem to have it in them to make a higher high.

 

To me, this suggests buyers are reluctant towards bidding above the top of the trading range, at least for the time being.

 

Lets wait and see.

 

hi there,

 

I don't want to go into a whole discussion related to corrective waves, but this one looks to be corrective, and, speciffically, a flat........time element is respected, structure is respected, b wave is the more complex, c wave takes less time, the structure of the whole pattern is 3-3-5........meaning new highs to come........

 

now, are these highs to come straight away? ....we don't know, as this corrective pattern (the flat) may be part of a complex corrective pattern (like a double combination, or triple combination, or double or triple three, etc)........

 

however, the real question is are these highs to come eventualy? Well, the answer is YES. This looks like a corrective wave and by the time it will finish price will break higher. Regardless of the fundamental reason. If any.

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:
so Fed signals strong improvement in the labor market according the the Fed member that spoke today.....are stocks tumbling?....end of QE? Tapering? Equities?.....oh well, Dow 15600.....anyone?

 

TW

 

twiz,

 

... pls make up your mind...

first you squelch any talk about underlying conditions -

"in the end, technical analysis prevails" etc etc.

... then you spew "Fed signals", "end of QE?" "Tapering? "

 

None these 'technicals' or (what you are calling) 'fundamentals' are on topic to your original neely LINK... you're blowing up your own thread...

 

None of the timeframes you're using - even including the weeklies - are on topic to your original neely LINK... more blowing up your own thread... and no amount of censoring zdo will fix that...

 

Maybe someone should remind you that EW is not going to attract much participation anyways... not real smart to drive the already limited support for EW topics away...

 

If you're really all that good with (e)Wave trading you should go private, proprietary - Dominick style - instead of looking all wishy washy up in here in your bully pulpit....

 

zdo

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last edited by tradingwizzard; 11-04-2013 at 03:18PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:
Dow closes on Record High.....were are the bears?

 

TW

 

Today was interesting. There was a another poke above the range that found no buyers and consequently price collapsed back into the range.

 

It now seems likely that the Dow will test the lower limit of the range, at 14,800.

 

This is my first target, where I take out 1/4 of my position and stay alert, since price could reverse.

 

If buyers don´t show up there, my next area of interest is 14,000, where I would scale out the second 1/4.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37339&stc=1&d=1383862616

5aa71206cf974_DowRange.png.fe066c520b088827b53d824c444933fe.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re: where are the bears? and

 

  tupapa said:
Today was interesting. There was a another poke above the range that found no buyers and consequently price collapsed back into the range.

 

It now seems likely that the Dow will test the lower limit of the range, at 14,800.

 

This is my first target, where I take out 1/4 of my position and stay alert, since price could reverse.

 

If buyers don´t show up there, my next area of interest is 14,000, where I would scale out the second 1/4.

 

 

 

 

Twiz, Just curious, is this the kind of conversation you were really seeking when you opened a

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

thread based on a LINK from Glenn Neely?

 

If so, all my macro posts (and anyone else's), are off topic. It is just a thread to discuss local SR etc etc... and with a name like

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

it sorta smells like

No Bears Allowed

 

Please let us know.

 

Thx.

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
re: where are the bears? and

 

 

 

 

 

Twiz, Just curious, is this the kind of conversation you were really seeking when you opened a

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

thread based on a LINK from Glenn Neely?

 

If so, all my macro posts (and anyone else's), are off topic. It is just a thread to discuss local SR etc etc... and with a name like

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

it sorta smells like

No Bears Allowed

 

Please let us know.

 

Thx.

 

zdo

 

it was not a link, it was a page I scanned from a book I have.....since it is not my analysis, the correct thing to do is to name the author.......

 

bears are allowed, but when in pain, don't come to bulls for treatment ;)

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tupapa said:
Today was interesting. There was a another poke above the range that found no buyers and consequently price collapsed back into the range.

 

It now seems likely that the Dow will test the lower limit of the range, at 14,800.

 

This is my first target, where I take out 1/4 of my position and stay alert, since price could reverse.

 

If buyers don´t show up there, my next area of interest is 14,000, where I would scale out the second 1/4.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37339&stc=1&d=1383862616

 

funny enough the chart you are pointing there resembles with a running variation of a contracting triangle......if it is correct, it implies drop no more than 61.8% out of the last leg higher and the thrust of the triangle should be minimum 161.8% extension when compared with the longest leg of the triangle .......you do the math and see what it means........but in the meantime, bears have all my respect and keeping fingers crossed

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one more time - with the essence of the question

 

Twiz, Just curious, is this the kind of conversation you were really seeking when you opened a

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

thread based on a LINK from Glenn Neely?

 

If so, all my macro posts (and anyone else's), are off topic.

(if so ) It is just a thread to discuss local SR etc etc...

 

Please let us know.

 

Thanks.

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
one more time - with the essence of the question

 

Twiz, Just curious, is this the kind of conversation you were really seeking when you opened a

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

thread based on a LINK from Glenn Neely?

 

If so, all my macro posts (and anyone else's), are off topic.

(if so ) It is just a thread to discuss local SR etc etc...

 

Please let us know.

 

Thanks.

 

zdo

 

you take it as you wish....you should be a big boy now to draw your own conclusions

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:
you take it as you wish....you should be a big boy now to draw your own conclusions

 

TW

 

Thank you TW.

 

and, as a 'big boy now, I will draw the conclusion' that you don't give a shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:
stock at record highs, yet again......any bear still alive?......anyone?

 

TW

 

Why should "anyone?" bother to post

since it’s obvious from the way you’ve managed this thread you can’t conceive how anyone could even be a bear alive?

or

since you've repeatedly refused to clarify your intentions of whether the thread really is about Dow =100000 or just about new highs with the Target title serving as sham promotion...

 

and, acording to policy, shouldn't you be posting (new highs) news and any other news in the news section

?

 

"is EU fixn to QE ??" = must long

links removed

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last pre-crimed by tradingwizzard; 11-06-2014 at 03:18PM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
Why should "anyone?" bother to post

since it’s obvious from the way you’ve managed this thread you can’t conceive how anyone could even be a bear alive?

or

since you've repeatedly refused to clarify your intentions of whether the thread really is about Dow =100000 or just about new highs with the Target title serving as sham promotion...

 

and, acording to policy, shouldn't you be posting (new highs) news and any other news in the news section

?

 

"is EU fixn to QE ??" = must long

links removed

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last pre-crimed by tradingwizzard; 11-06-2014 at 03:18PM.

 

God you're so pissed off...I like that :)

 

relax....enjoy life

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
... congratulations ......

 

thank you....you're so kind........

 

letting joke aside....posting is not mandatory, saying earlier and saying it here again.......it is not a contest

 

it is a thread for God's sake for regular people to discuss why on earth equities are making new highs repeatedly.......IT IS NOT A NEWS............

 

Thank you for your understanding,

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tradingwizzard said:

...it is not a contest

 

Thank you for your understanding,

 

 

You're welcome. :roll eyes:

Edited by tradingwizzard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am generally bearish by nature.....I just choose to wait for the opportune time to sell rather than fighting the trend.

 

disclaimer: no one forced me to write this, I dont care about 10k, 100k or 1mil in the dow, I am just a cynical middle aged man but have always been so even when younger, I agree this is not a contest, my computers will soon be back on line after renovations gone astray, I have zero respect for builders even though my brothers are in the building game, even less respect for accountants, after time off from trading I am less interested in day trading and more interested in bigger picture themes. No animals were hurt in this renovation unless you include children (hey - you gotta applaud their small hands are good for somethings) and my bank account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.