Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

Dow Jones = 100,000 Target

Recommended Posts

This thread is dedicated to all the bears out there and the forecast is not mine, however, it has been made in the late 1988 when price was where it was, as you can see in the image attached. I scaned the chart from "Masterin Elliott Waves" book, written by Glen Neely, one of the best trading books ever writen.

 

The thing is that the pattern you are seeing there is called a Double Three Running and such a pattern it is ALMOST ALWAYS followed by a third wave extended impulsive move. In order for a wave to be considered extended, it should travel more than 161.8% when compared with the first wave. In this case, the extension tool should start from the absolute low, to the highs at the end of WAVE (I) and to the lows in WAVE (II).

And from that moment on we should look for an extended move.

 

All in all, the chart calls for the 100,000 level to be touched by the year 2060 if we take the time element into consideration.

 

Keep in mind the call was made when Dow was below 8000 points late 1988. No QE's, etc., known at that date, no financial crises and all this crap we are facing now.

 

So.....your opinions please? Crazy? Stupid? Impossible? ....well, as far as I know, impossible is nothing, and in this case, the buy and hold worked just fine.

 

Enjoy.

IMG_20130902_0002.thumb.jpg.c71a738196a9d322257c0e976ea8f36c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You'll have to excuse my complete disinterest in where the Dow will be in 2060.

Quite simply..........................................I fully expect to be dead.

However,if you anticipate being alive around this time you might wanna consider ceasing all trading activities immediately and just buy and hold a few blue chips and go and do something else in the meantime.But i'd check with the author (since you rate his book so highly) and find out how he plans to capitalize on this seemingly useless piece of information(?)

Finally,come back and post half a dozen reasons why we're all missing something here.

Frankly you'll be pushed to find 2 I should think.

 

Hi mits...great to see you're live and well...I was missing your sarcasm :)

 

I named the book as the analysis is not mine...I just scanned the chart and is logical to name the author....but I do think is a freat book as it changed my trading style

 

I would be ok with 80k for Dow Jones, so make it 2040 :).....kidding earlier...probably bears are looking for some technical explanation....well, one is this:double three running and the targets above

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some opinions

1 in 2060 there won’t even be a Dow JIA index … there will be indexes but that one will either be back to really ‘industrial’ or replaced by then.

 

2 theoretically ( in economic and social theoreticals) Glenn’s projections are sound … even if it turns out he’s off by thousands of points and years.

 

3 I’ve said several times herein, the dow, to really be in a BULL right now needs to be much higher than it is… in my ‘numbers’, it needed to be at 18000 five years ago… 24000 to 28000 now…

Look at an index chart priced in gold = bear mkt .

But for you, it’s dressed up like a bull. Yes, often the biggest lies really are the easiest lies... fiat. The (realistic ??? ) ‘bulls’ are going long at “subsidized prices and when they adjust, at whatever point in the future, they [may] adjust immediately and on no volume.”

Ie the financial world is operating on false metrics … yen history of ‘lies’, europeen[sp] history of lies, dollar history of lies, etc. so

 

4 the metrics of 2060 will be different, see 2 above.

 

I can relate to why you discuss it, twiz – but most are going to find it specious…

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some opinions

1 in 2060 there won’t even be a Dow JIA index … there will be indexes but that one will either be back to really ‘industrial’ or replaced by then.

 

2 theoretically ( in economic and social theoreticals) Glenn’s projections are sound … even if it turns out he’s off by thousands of points and years.

 

3 I’ve said several times herein, the dow, to really be in a BULL right now needs to be much higher than it is… in my ‘numbers’, it needed to be at 18000 five years ago… 24000 to 28000 now…

Look at an index chart priced in gold = bear mkt .

But for you, it’s dressed up like a bull. Yes, often the biggest lies really are the easiest lies... fiat. The (realistic ??? ) ‘bulls’ are going long at “subsidized prices and when they adjust, at whatever point in the future, they [may] adjust immediately and on no volume.”

Ie the financial world is operating on false metrics … yen history of ‘lies’, europeen[sp] history of lies, dollar history of lies, etc. so

 

4 the metrics of 2060 will be different, see 2 above.

 

I can relate to why you discuss it, twiz – but most are going to find it specious…

 

All the best,

 

zdo

 

hi zdo,

 

finally a good reply to the thread........well, probably the ones in the 90's thought the same.....and here we are 100% higher

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

(

:offtopic:

btw he mentions gov’t “shutdown” , debt ceilings, etc

some thoughts re that

Was the Debt Ceiling Crisis a Lie? | Gains Pains & Capital

 

It should also be noted – in the form of a multiple choice question

The debt ceiling has now been suspended completely for

a) 90 days

b) Forever

c) None of the above.

 

I know , I know , it’s unfathomable how I can be so dam cynical. :missy:

)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stocks rise to fresh record high, yet again.

 

100K ....anyone?

 

In addition to my attempts above to comment that such an advance denominated in USD may really not be that much of an accomplishment…

someone should also note that (and ...understandably, you’ll deny inferring such ;)… but) an underlying tone of your posts is that it’s going to go there straightly, directly and that all one needs to do is ‘long bias’.

 

So - some ‘voice of experience’ to all our overleveraged ‘long bias’ buddies out there ---- I did very well overleveraged and ‘long bias’ in the indexes through the 90’s, but there were at least a dozen times I was ‘right’ in the long term but had I stayed long stubbornly, I would have gone bust…

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In addition to my attempts above to comment that such an advance denominated in USD may really not be that much of an accomplishment…

someone should also note that (and ...understandably, you’ll deny inferring such ;)… but) an underlying tone of your posts is that it’s going to go there straightly, directly and that all one needs to do is ‘long bias’.

 

So - some ‘voice of experience’ to all our overleveraged ‘long bias’ buddies out there ---- I did very well overleveraged and ‘long bias’ in the indexes through the 90’s, but there were at least a dozen times I was ‘right’ in the long term but had I stayed long stubbornly, I would have gone bust…

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

 

I'm not saying anything......of course it will not go in a straight line for God's sake.......remember 2008 crisis when Dow dipped that much? ....it was a time to buy......not saying here we're going rocketing to the moon, but pointing the direction....

 

everytime I will see on the news indices made a new all time high, I will just bring back this thread with the question.........anyone?

 

I guess only Buffett is thrilled

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying anything

someone should say something.

 

...

 

Back on (an ET thread in TL) topic…

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

 

ie …are we @ ‘2007 America’ or @ ‘2006 Zimbabwe’ or @ … ?

A Tale of Two Charts: Are We 2007 America or 2006 Zimbabwe? | John Rubino | Safehaven.com

 

 

“To inform people is hard slugging.” Paul Craig Roberts

 

....observing those inner figures...

when an inner bear has had enough and 'finally decides' to capitulate to the long side ... is generally a good time to be one....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twiz,

 

bump

 

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twiz,

 

bump

 

It is my impression that Neely thought ‘growth’ would be a much more significant factor than ‘hyperinflation’ to get us to 100000 dow. Is that your impression?

 

what did he knew back then about QE??? :).....regardless the reason, here we are about to test 16 k ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he definitely knew about 'qe' and eventual 'QE'... still it's my impression that...

 

... btw, now you're putting words in my mouth :)

it's not about "reason(s)"

it's more about 'relative to('s)'

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
he definitely knew about 'qe' and eventual 'QE'... still it's my impression that...

 

... btw, now you're putting words in my mouth :)

it's not about "reason(s)"

it's more about 'relative to('s)'

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

 

I know, I know,

 

thing is I am a real fan of technical analysis....I do think (and trade) based on human behaviour and take time into consideration.......not Gann or anything, but, as far as my IQ goes, I seem to keep a steady line and be profitable.......in the end this is all that matters

 

this pattern Neely shows us here, is a pattern I use in my analysis all the time, on lower time frames of course, like 1h, 4h, etc,.......and it is coming through!.....so.......don't want to be the one who is not considering fundamentals, cause I do, it brings volatility to the markets......but Neely did know something about fundamentals to come when charting this? ...no.....

 

if you look back on ANY chart bigger than daily and see the ups and downs price made through the years, can you pinpoint the FUNDAMENTAL reason that was there?....the answer is no

 

so regardless if it is Europe, Lehman Brothers, 9/11, Greece, Italy, etc.....in the end, technical analysis prevails

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you ask, here is my take on the Dow:

 

We are at the top of the Trading Range, so I´d say a short is legit if the red down wave materialises itself. Initial target is the lower limit of the Trading Range, although price needn't necessarily stop there.

 

If price breaks above the Trading Range, I´d take a long after a retracement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37297&stc=1&d=1383252092

dow.thumb.png.d03610e280f4ea59a53f8f9467f5dd22.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since you ask, here is my take on the Dow:

 

We are at the top of the Trading Range, so I´d say a short is legit if the red down wave materialises itself. Initial target is the lower limit of the Trading Range, although price needn't necessarily stop there.

 

If price breaks above the Trading Range, I´d take a long after a retracement.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=37297&stc=1&d=1383252092

 

hi there,

 

to me on the weekly chart there it seems to be a flat, and this one is poised to break higher

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know, I know,

 

thing is I am a real fan of technical analysis....I do think (and trade) based on human behaviour and take time into consideration.......not Gann or anything, but, as far as my IQ goes, I seem to keep a steady line and be profitable.......in the end this is all that matters

 

this pattern Neely shows us here, is a pattern I use in my analysis all the time, on lower time frames of course, like 1h, 4h, etc,.......and it is coming through!.....so.......don't want to be the one who is not considering fundamentals, cause I do, it brings volatility to the markets......but Neely did know something about fundamentals to come when charting this? ...no.....

 

if you look back on ANY chart bigger than daily and see the ups and downs price made through the years, can you pinpoint the FUNDAMENTAL reason that was there?....the answer is no

 

so regardless if it is Europe, Lehman Brothers, 9/11, Greece, Italy, etc.....in the end, technical analysis prevails

 

TW

 

good lord twiz ;) first … I thought it was just me

then… I thought it was just him ;)

either way…now I’m starting to ‘understand’ Mits comments to / about you over in the Fractal thread…

 

...still bumpn the question, twiz ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hi there,

 

to me on the weekly chart there it seems to be a flat, and this one is poised to break higher

 

TW

 

Really? And what makes you think it's poised to break higher?

 

There was a clear rejection of resistance on wednesday and both yesterday and today buyers don't seem to have it in them to make a higher high.

 

To me, this suggests buyers are reluctant towards bidding above the top of the trading range, at least for the time being.

 

Lets wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Really? And what makes you think it's poised to break higher?

 

There was a clear rejection of resistance on wednesday and both yesterday and today buyers don't seem to have it in them to make a higher high.

 

To me, this suggests buyers are reluctant towards bidding above the top of the trading range, at least for the time being.

 

Lets wait and see.

 

Wait and see never made nor lost a dime.

 

Resistance, perhaps, in certain timeframes. But in the timeframes that matter to longer term traders, its all noise in the direction of geometric growth.

 

Higher is the better bet. Any threat of tapering will only increase the volatility. It will not change the direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody pls help us out… what does whether this little congestion on the weekly breaks north or south have to do with dow making it to 100000 or not?

 

 

 

 

have a great weekend all.

Edited by tradingwizzard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.