Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

3 Signs a Trading Range is Ready to Break

Recommended Posts

3 Signs a Trading Range is Ready to Break

 

Range trading is one of the easiest and most effective technical analysis strategies, given the ease with which sideways ranges can be identified. Another advantage with this approach is the fact that stop loss levels and profit targets are not difficult to place. We simply buy when prices fall toward support (with stop losses just below the range support), and take profits once prices rise back toward range resistance. For short positions, we sell at the upper end range resistance (with stop losses just above that resistance), and take profits once prices fall back toward support. Trading ranges are a fairly common feature of market activity, so it does not take much time to find new trading opportunities.

 

But the biggest risk for these types of trades can be seen when those ranges break, as this will cause your stop loss to be hit. So, it is important to find ways to identify these potential risks as a means for protecting your positions. Here, we will look at three tell-tale signs that a trading range is ready to break and start trending in a new direction. An added benefit of these events can be seen when new trending (breakout) positions are established in their early phases. But even if breakout strategies are not your cup of tea, these signals can still prove highly valuable when you are exposed to positions that benefit from sideways movements.

 

Changing Price Conditions

 

One of the only certainties in the market is that prices cannot continue on one direction forever. Change is a helpful and essential aspect of the market environment, but when we are caught off-guard, losses start to accumulate. There are many ways to spot trend breakouts (a changing range bound environment), and it is important to act on these signals once they develop. This is true not only for those looking to establish new positions in the upcoming trend, but for those in positions that are based on the range scenario that is about to be invalidated.

 

To achieve this, we must note some of the common price traits that are seen when prices are ready to explode into a new bull or bear trend. An understanding of these traits will allow you to get in “on the ground floor” of the next trending move, or at least to avoid range trades that have a better chance of being stopped for a loss. In this article, we will look at three of these traits. To be sure, more than three exist but once these market events are seen they can prove highly effective in signaling significant market changes.

 

Common Breakout Precursors

 

Chart scenarios suggesting prices are trading water should be viewed with skepticism if any or all of the following elements are true:

 

● Prices are consolidating sideways after a significant trending move has occurred

● Sentiment readings become highly unbalanced and oppose the previous trend

● Oscillator readings are consolidating

 

 

Consolidating Prices After Impulsive Activity

 

When we use the word consolidation, we essentially mean that prices are trading in constricting ranges. Use of the Average True Range (ATR) indicator is one way of seeing this, and if we see declines in the reading we would see an indication of increased consolidation. Chart patterns offer other ways of seeing this activity. For example, in the first charted illustration we can see a symmetrical triangle (a common consolidation pattern), with prices trading in smaller and smaller ranges. But since this activity cannot continue forever, upside breaks out of these triangles should be thought of as a “buy” signal, while a downside break would indicate that sell positions should be taken.

 

Of course, consolidation patterns do not need to be symmetrical, and other examples include wedges and coil patterns that are marked by higher lows and lower highs. For these patterns, the most interesting area is the apex, as the smaller spaces make it much more likely that prices will break outside the pattern, and send the next trending signal. When prices constrict into consolidation patterns, buy orders can be placed above the structure and sell orders can be placed below. This is done in anticipation of the explosive move that is likely to follow. These patterns can lead to even more extreme moves when they follow a big trending move, creating a “Flag” structure. In these cases, a single entry order can be placed in the direction of the previous trend.

 

Sentiment Indicators Reach Extremes

 

An alternative approach can be used when we look at sentiment indicators, which show the type (buy or sell) and number of open positions in your chosen currency pair. One of the most commonly used readings is the Commitments of Traders (COT) report, which is released every Friday. Essentially, this tells us where the majority of traders have based their positions. So, for example if we see most of the market positioned long in a bullish environment, there is real danger that uptrend will reverse because there is nobody left to buy the asset. An event like this can lead to stalling, where ranges form and prices constrict. Once the majority loses hope and starts to close positions, major reversals can follow, breaking prices out of the previous range. For these reasons, it is important to have an idea of where market sentiment rests before establishing new positions. The best opportunities are usually seen when more than two-thirds of the market is positioned on one side, as this creates strong potential for sharp reversals.

 

Consolidating Oscillator Readings

 

Oscillators can be useful in spotting potential breakouts as well. Tools such as the MACD, which lets us see instances where price and momentum are in agreement or diverging. But what many traders miss is that the indicator readings themselves can show consolidation scenarios, which can signal major breakouts are coming down the pipe. Similar moves can be seen when price and momentum show divergences, as there is little reason to believe that the moves currently seen can sustain themselves. Here, we will look at Oscillator consolidation, which bears resemblance with price consolidation.

 

In the next charted example, we can see that movement in the MACD is constricting near the zero line, indicating a period of indecision and tighter trading ranges. In this example, we can see a symmetrical triangle as formed as movement in the MACD constricts, but price patterns could also be seen as wedges or rectangular trading ranges as well. Price breaks above the symmetrical just as the MACD reading starts to move into positive territory, and this would be our initial signal that a major bullish trend is beginning. So, in a case like this, we would not want to look to simply buy at support and sell at resistance because there are simply too many signals that a big trending move will be seen. In this example, signals are sent from both the MACD and the price itself, so if we were also to see an unbalanced sentiment reading (in this case, a majority of traders positioned short), all three elements would be in place and high probability long positions should be initiated.

 

Conclusion: Avoid Range Trading When Evidence of a Breakout is Apparent

 

These three market elements give traders important clues with respect to the types of trading strategies that should be implemented. When there is mounting evidence which suggests that constricting price activity is coming to an end, traders can expect big breakouts. This means that range trading strategies should be avoided in favor of breakout orders positioned above or below the consolidation pattern.

Bullish-Symmetric-Triangle.png.8c3d49912da4f7079ccaa21f6965afdc.png

symm.PNG.e9080f7289264bc556f2703a7750a9d2.PNG

MACD.PNG.424c87c89c78adbcdb87e66f3c6affc6.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.