Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dasziel

Is Poker and Trading the Same Thing?

Recommended Posts

Seeing this spot, it seems industry comes over the poker and trading comparasion.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN8UaN6PPBk

 

For me the differences are:

 

1.Trading tournaments treated as poker games are completely skill games without luck as all participants get the same cards ( quotes) .

2. Patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline.

 

To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

 

...the market is people.

 

Plus… http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-psychology/10549-they-don-t-schedule-championships-trading.html

 

If you need to “challenge people”, why not join in face to face gaming at the tables – poker, etc.

If you’re serious about trading, such a ‘tournament’ might be appropriate during certain developmental stages, but most would be advised to avoid them… sorta like most would be advised to avoid spread betting, buying premium, etc. etc. . … that is – if you’re serious about trading…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

You are right, but I like to make some considerations.

From my point of view its not the same spread betting, where yor EV is below zero, as you bet againts the house, that trading tournaments, where house only collects a rake for management. EV depends on players in each tournament.

 

I think you can be seriously with trading and play trading tournament to win money in the same way, sorry i dont see the difference.

 

If you manage a hedge fund, then its different, but in the case of rtail traders....for me its clear.

 

A Trader can swap between real trading and trading tournaments.

 

One thing is clear. In a development stage tournament are more powerful than a demo with 50 dollar running in MT4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seeing this spot, it seems industry comes over the poker and trading comparasion.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN8UaN6PPBk

 

For me the differences are:

 

1.Trading tournaments treated as poker games are completely skill games without luck as all participants get the same cards ( quotes) .

2. Patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline.

 

To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

I think poker games also needs luck.

Since patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline, why do you say it's a difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IS Poker and Trading the Same Thing?

 

Actually no. One is a card game, the other involves financial markets.

Hope that clears everything up for everyone.

I did make the assumption you were talking about trading as in buying and selling financial on listed commodity, stock and futures exchanges.

You may in fact have been talking about trading cards of some kind?

 

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poker and trading are very similar in that they are both zero (negative) sum games. Negative since there is either a commission or a rake to pay on each trade or hand.

 

It is easier to assume that a poker game played at a casino is a fair game, but not as easy to assume that trading is as fair as it should be.

 

The payment process is the same in both. The weak or unlucky players pay the strong or good players. In either venue a lucky and poor participant could take money from a good and unlucky participant. Foolishly, people claim that they would rather be lucky than good, but everyone gets their moment when the sun shines only on them but not everyone can be good.

 

I would rather be good than lucky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

 

If hoping you win lotto is how you plan on retiring before or after 50, then you best hope at the same time that the food stamp program continues. Lotto is a fool's game and attracts fools. It is you and those who think like you who benefit most form collectivism.

 

Good luck with your dollar and your dream. I suppose you'll stick it to me when you win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

 

re: "The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'."

:helloooo: In here, we're talking here about skilled performance workers - not skilled production, persuasion, or service workers

doubling down on that :doh:

 

 

 

 

 

 

....

 

 

 

 

 

 

At any “right now” – I’d rather be ‘lucky’ than ‘good’.

But across time, I’d rather be ‘good’ than ‘lucky’

cause if you ain’t ‘good’, you have little chance of properly utilizing what ‘lucky’ brought you… which will keep you in the basically the same boat as the ‘unluckies and bads’

 

… the best ‘plan’ is to go for ‘good’ AND ‘lucky’ :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard the phrase..."he ran out of luck". You never run out of "good"... good is enduring... it's there through all seasons. Work at good, and be willing to admit that sometimes you were lucky. Ben Hogan said... "the harder I work; the luckier I get. True dat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you rather be a casino or a Blackjack player?

 

The casino has an edge; it is good at what it does. The blackjack player has no edge and can only rely on luck.

 

There aren't may long run black blackjack winners. If there are, they probably stopped playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Poker and trading are very similar in that they are both zero (negative) sum games. Negative since there is either a commission or a rake to pay on each trade or hand.

 

It is easier to assume that a poker game played at a casino is a fair game, but not as easy to assume that trading is as fair as it should be.

 

The payment process is the same in both. The weak or unlucky players pay the strong or good players. In either venue a lucky and poor participant could take money from a good and unlucky participant. Foolishly, people claim that they would rather be lucky than good, but everyone gets their moment when the sun shines only on them but not everyone can be good.

 

I would rather be good than lucky

 

Agree.

 

Markets are like poker but with different cards for retails and institutional. If you cannot beat people in a trading tournament wiht same rules, slippages, leverage, etc.... its impossible you beat the market by your own....its a dream.

 

Personally, I think trading tournaments played like poker in terms of competion, prize pool, etc.. if they are run in a professional way, it can be a good tool to start, or generate incomes for traders with small accounts ( less 10,000).

 

For example, traderlinker is starting to run this model, and English spoken people is not there, spanish are playing already.

Take a look to leaderboard, its amazing!

 

(Yes, im the 6th:))

 

https://en.traderlinker.com/portadas/lideres

 

Regards,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.