Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dasziel

Is Poker and Trading the Same Thing?

Recommended Posts

Seeing this spot, it seems industry comes over the poker and trading comparasion.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN8UaN6PPBk

 

For me the differences are:

 

1.Trading tournaments treated as poker games are completely skill games without luck as all participants get the same cards ( quotes) .

2. Patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline.

 

To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

 

...the market is people.

 

Plus… http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/trading-psychology/10549-they-don-t-schedule-championships-trading.html

 

If you need to “challenge people”, why not join in face to face gaming at the tables – poker, etc.

If you’re serious about trading, such a ‘tournament’ might be appropriate during certain developmental stages, but most would be advised to avoid them… sorta like most would be advised to avoid spread betting, buying premium, etc. etc. . … that is – if you’re serious about trading…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

You are right, but I like to make some considerations.

From my point of view its not the same spread betting, where yor EV is below zero, as you bet againts the house, that trading tournaments, where house only collects a rake for management. EV depends on players in each tournament.

 

I think you can be seriously with trading and play trading tournament to win money in the same way, sorry i dont see the difference.

 

If you manage a hedge fund, then its different, but in the case of rtail traders....for me its clear.

 

A Trader can swap between real trading and trading tournaments.

 

One thing is clear. In a development stage tournament are more powerful than a demo with 50 dollar running in MT4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seeing this spot, it seems industry comes over the poker and trading comparasion.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lN8UaN6PPBk

 

For me the differences are:

 

1.Trading tournaments treated as poker games are completely skill games without luck as all participants get the same cards ( quotes) .

2. Patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline.

 

To be honest, maybe it can be interesting to challenge people instead of challenge the market.

 

¿Opinions?

I think poker games also needs luck.

Since patient, discipline and risk/reward analysis in real time are shared in both discipline, why do you say it's a difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IS Poker and Trading the Same Thing?

 

Actually no. One is a card game, the other involves financial markets.

Hope that clears everything up for everyone.

I did make the assumption you were talking about trading as in buying and selling financial on listed commodity, stock and futures exchanges.

You may in fact have been talking about trading cards of some kind?

 

:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poker and trading are very similar in that they are both zero (negative) sum games. Negative since there is either a commission or a rake to pay on each trade or hand.

 

It is easier to assume that a poker game played at a casino is a fair game, but not as easy to assume that trading is as fair as it should be.

 

The payment process is the same in both. The weak or unlucky players pay the strong or good players. In either venue a lucky and poor participant could take money from a good and unlucky participant. Foolishly, people claim that they would rather be lucky than good, but everyone gets their moment when the sun shines only on them but not everyone can be good.

 

I would rather be good than lucky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

 

If hoping you win lotto is how you plan on retiring before or after 50, then you best hope at the same time that the food stamp program continues. Lotto is a fool's game and attracts fools. It is you and those who think like you who benefit most form collectivism.

 

Good luck with your dollar and your dream. I suppose you'll stick it to me when you win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd rather be lucky than good any day of the week.

That has to be one of the easiest choices in human history.

And to disagree, means a person has incredibly poor insight and judgement.

 

The lucky win lotto at 18. :cool:

 

The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'. :doh:

 

The lucky wins lotto again in their 30's.

 

Yep, only a fool would wish to be skillful more than lucky. :rofl:

 

re: "The skilled are still sitting at their desk at 50, trying to generate an income and accumulate enough savings to one day 'retire'."

:helloooo: In here, we're talking here about skilled performance workers - not skilled production, persuasion, or service workers

doubling down on that :doh:

 

 

 

 

 

 

....

 

 

 

 

 

 

At any “right now” – I’d rather be ‘lucky’ than ‘good’.

But across time, I’d rather be ‘good’ than ‘lucky’

cause if you ain’t ‘good’, you have little chance of properly utilizing what ‘lucky’ brought you… which will keep you in the basically the same boat as the ‘unluckies and bads’

 

… the best ‘plan’ is to go for ‘good’ AND ‘lucky’ :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard the phrase..."he ran out of luck". You never run out of "good"... good is enduring... it's there through all seasons. Work at good, and be willing to admit that sometimes you were lucky. Ben Hogan said... "the harder I work; the luckier I get. True dat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you rather be a casino or a Blackjack player?

 

The casino has an edge; it is good at what it does. The blackjack player has no edge and can only rely on luck.

 

There aren't may long run black blackjack winners. If there are, they probably stopped playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Poker and trading are very similar in that they are both zero (negative) sum games. Negative since there is either a commission or a rake to pay on each trade or hand.

 

It is easier to assume that a poker game played at a casino is a fair game, but not as easy to assume that trading is as fair as it should be.

 

The payment process is the same in both. The weak or unlucky players pay the strong or good players. In either venue a lucky and poor participant could take money from a good and unlucky participant. Foolishly, people claim that they would rather be lucky than good, but everyone gets their moment when the sun shines only on them but not everyone can be good.

 

I would rather be good than lucky

 

Agree.

 

Markets are like poker but with different cards for retails and institutional. If you cannot beat people in a trading tournament wiht same rules, slippages, leverage, etc.... its impossible you beat the market by your own....its a dream.

 

Personally, I think trading tournaments played like poker in terms of competion, prize pool, etc.. if they are run in a professional way, it can be a good tool to start, or generate incomes for traders with small accounts ( less 10,000).

 

For example, traderlinker is starting to run this model, and English spoken people is not there, spanish are playing already.

Take a look to leaderboard, its amazing!

 

(Yes, im the 6th:))

 

https://en.traderlinker.com/portadas/lideres

 

Regards,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.