Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tradingwizzard

Live Trading the Currency Markets

Recommended Posts

September updated.......+426 pips booked so far....only one in bad shape is cadchf but even if SL will be hit it will still be a positive month......coming after +400 in July also.....I would say it is not bad judging by my standards

 

BTW wats ur lot size for those pips, if its a big lot size then it God-damn big money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTW wats ur lot size for those pips, if its a big lot size then it God-damn big money...

 

:)......big enough to make me happy.......the important thing is to be on the right side of the market and it shows Elliott (as this is what I use mostly) still has a thing of two in trading....:)....let's see what October brings......

 

a short forecasting if allowed:

 

eurusd to break previous 1.31710 highs

gbpusd to reach at least 1.6430 level

eurcad to move above 1.40 in a big way and target 1.48

 

:)........let's see what market makes out of those above in October;);)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your last two months (since I started visiting TL again anyhow) have been superb by anyone's pip standards I am sure. Results wise, I always find looking at raw pip values doesn't really say that much in terms of ones trading approach or their ability to manage to risk within an approach. Would you consider future summaries to be posted as an R multiple?

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your last two months (since I started visiting TL again anyhow) have been superb by anyone's pip standards I am sure. Results wise, I always find looking at raw pip values doesn't really say that much in terms of ones trading approach or their ability to manage to risk within an approach. Would you consider future summaries to be posted as an R multiple?

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

hi there,

 

I'm not quite sure I understand the question here......you talk about rr ratio or?

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Essentially, yes.

 

You risk 100p and make 80p the R multiple is 0.8

risk 100p and make 160p, the R multiple is 1.6

 

Puts ones results in perspective relative to their risk.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Essentially, yes.

 

You risk 100p and make 80p the R multiple is 0.8

risk 100p and make 160p, the R multiple is 1.6

 

Puts ones results in perspective relative to their risk.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

I agree with you there but there's a catch...I never enter a trade without having a positive rr ratio, but currency markets are volatile and depending on what is happening (for example now with the Italian government, etc), I may decide to exit trades earlier than expected....and so the rr ratio is compromised....is that wrong?

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No not wrong at all because there is no right :)

 

You seem to have a high win rate and usually that goes hand in hand with a lower average R multiple. Nothing wrong with it. We enter trades with a possible vision for the future and often adapt as we get new information - nothing wrong with it at all. I guess I just like to see gains in perspective to what was at risk. Sorry for the extra noise in your thread.

 

With kind regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No not wrong at all because there is no right :)

 

You seem to have a high win rate and usually that goes hand in hand with a lower average R multiple. Nothing wrong with it. We enter trades with a possible vision for the future and often adapt as we get new information - nothing wrong with it at all. I guess I just like to see gains in perspective to what was at risk. Sorry for the extra noise in your thread.

 

With kind regards,

MK

 

no, no....Iike the noise.....:)

 

TW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade nr. 3 Going SHORT EURSD here in 1.3565 for 1.3428 tp sl 1.3610

 

coming back shortly with the explanation

 

well, just to simply explain this one is that lack of follow through at 1.3560/80 area coupled with ECB to come earlier this week (Draghi lately tried to talk down the euro on any single occasion he had) implies weakness for the pairt in the short term....1.34 area eyed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade nr. 2 Going SHORT EURJPY here in 132.84 for 131.00 tp and sl 134.32

 

head and shoulders on the 4h chart......will post the chart in a bit

 

well, I can't resist a quick scalp when markets are moving fast in my direction and just closing the short here in 132.41 for a nice +43 pips profit :) welcome to October

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade nr. 3 Going SHORT EURSD here in 1.3565 for 1.3428 tp sl 1.3610

 

coming back shortly with the explanation

 

covering the short here in 1.3522 for a nive 43 pips profit......ECB day today and Draghi speaks, so taking things out of the trading table on this pair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade nr. 8 Going LONG EURUSD here in 1.3624 for 1.3710 sl 1.35

 

fundamental based trade, new highs to be challanged in 1.3710 area and this is Friday, not NFP today it seems, so chances are we squeeze shorts till they go crazy:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trade nr. 7 Going LONG GBPUSD here in 1.6211 for 1.6265 tp sl 1.61

 

no rr ratio here as this one is supposed to be more like a scalp based on the future to be released ISM non-manufacturing.....let's see how it plays out

 

stoped out on cable......oh well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The EUR/USD remained in short range on Thursday where investors couldn’t figure out a clear trend due to the mixed nature of the economic indicators released yesterday. The services PMI of Italy and Spain both were mixed while later on the unemployment claims in the U.S increased lesser than expected but the non-manufacturing PMI couldn’t beat the forecasted figure.

 

However, it fell down by more than 60 points on Friday and managed to close in a bearish zone.... sellers are getting active on the pair....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.