Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Igor

The Martingale System in Forex Trading

Recommended Posts

The Martingale system is a probability theory that’s been popular in gambling since the eighteenth century, and more recently in forex trading. The strategy can be used in any situation where there is an even money (or close to even money) outcome – for example, a coin toss, or red/black on a roulette board.

 

The idea of the Martingale System is to double the bet after every losing bet, so that when a win eventually comes, all losses are recouped, along with a small profit from the initial bet. Of course, for the system to work, a very large bankroll is required to counter the possibility of long losing streaks.

 

The Martingale system originated in France during the eighteenth century, it wasn’t until the twentieth century, however, that the theory was examined more closely by probability theorist and mathematician Paul Lévy. However Lévy did not use the term “Martingale” – this was introduced in 1939 by Ville, who saw the similarities between Levy’s research and the earlier French betting strategies of the same name.

 

The Martingale System is often applied in forex trading either manually or through expert advisors run on the MT4 trader platform. The system is attractive to new investors because on the surface it seems like a failsafe method for making decisions. But as the Investopedia definition of the Martingale system describes, it’s a “very risky method of investing” because of the inherent risk of a losing run that’s long enough to bankrupt the investor.

 

Unlike forex trading, where more control can be exercised in the system’s use, in roulette the Martingale system actually has a negative expectation because of the house edge in the form of the zero (and in some variations the double zero). This house edge adds the extra chance of a loss every 36 spins.

 

Using roulette as an example of the inherent risk of the system, in 73 spins there is a 50.3% chance that you will lose 6 “coin flip” (e.g. red vs black) spins in a row. This means that if your initial wager is $10, you would need to be placing a wager of $640 (after $10 + $20 + $40 + $80 + $160 + $320) on the seventh spin just to win back your original $10 bet. Of course, losing streaks even greater than six are also frequent. See this article for more information about the Martingale system in roulette.

 

There’s really no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to systems like this, and the Martingale system is deceptively risky. The expected value is zero, and actually less than zero when it is being used on something that’s 50-50 yet the house is taking a percentage, such as in roulette. The zero expected value is just not very apparent because the downside seems so improbable, and yet is so catastrophic when it actually occurs.

 

Whilst it may seem on the surface to be an infallible strategy, the Martingale system is inherently flawed because of the huge bank required and the inherent risk of losing that bank. Long losing streaks are far more common than intuition would suggest, and the small rewards from winning the vast majority of the time are quickly offset when a long losing streak occurs.

 

In contrast to roulette the Martingale system is less risky when used in forex trading than in gambling. This is for several reasons, including:

• Expert advisors can be configured to incorporate stop losses

• Unlike the pure randomness of a coin toss, outcomes in the world of forex trading will to some extent depend on previous outcomes, making very long losing streaks less likely

• The system can be adapted to be more sophisticated in order to deal with the greater complexities of the forex world, making it more of a variation on the traditional Martingale, and potentially profitable.

 

One of the main downsides of using the Martingale system in forex trading is ending up on the wrong side of a down-trending market. Without proper stop losses in place to protect your position, the trades could continue to be executed by the expert advisor with the market experiencing a downswing, which could quickly put you in a position where a small starting trade has grown by several thousand per cent.

 

If you’d like to experiment with some variations of the Martingale system in your own trading, it’s a good idea to try it with a demo account first and let it run over a large sample size so you can get a good idea for the potential for long streaks. Even after getting a firm understanding of how the Martingale system can work for forex trading, it’s still a good idea to make sure you are well leveraged before trying anything automated using an EA.

 

Thanks to www.MapleLeafCasino.ca for their help with this article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO

Lear to make pips and become a skilled trader , one who can daily take pips out of the market.That is a professional skilled trader.

 

These thoughts of gambling and winning by gambling is sign of a weak trader , the power of the thought will lead to blowing your accounts under emotional control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lear to make pips and become a skilled trader , one who can daily take pips out of the market.That is a professional skilled trader.

 

These thoughts of gambling and winning by gambling is sign of a weak trader , the power of the thought will lead to blowing your accounts under emotional control.

 

 

I have to disagree.

 

I do know people who make money everyday, or most days, but they are not traders staring at charts. Unless your engaged in exploiting some fairly complex arbitrage opportunities, I doubt there's anyone out there consistently taking pips over such a small period of time

 

It doesn't take much imagination to design a method of making money everyday, and I'm sure we've all been there, but generally there's another side to that particular coin.

 

Trading is a fairly difficult undertaking because your opponents edge is a lot bigger than most people imagine. Any post that attempts to reinforce the crazy idea that you get rich by making money every day needs to be challenged.

 

I'm no advocate of martingale position sizing, and its somewhat of a shock to see it being pimped by a moderator (well actually it isn't, but that's because I'm a cynical old git who knows how the industry works) but the adoption of the mindset of a professional gambler is in my opinion at least, almost a pre requisite to trading successfully.

 

I'm very clear on my position, I gamble, and I manage that process, and I make money by capitalizing on good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lear to make pips and become a skilled trader , one who can daily take pips out of the market.That is a professional skilled trader.

 

These thoughts of gambling and winning by gambling is sign of a weak trader , the power of the thought will lead to blowing your accounts under emotional control.

 

ok igor, thanks for making a post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
I have to disagree.

 

I do know people who make money everyday, or most days, but they are not traders staring at charts. Unless your engaged in exploiting some fairly complex arbitrage opportunities, I doubt there's anyone out there consistently taking pips over such a small period of time

 

It doesn't take much imagination to design a method of making money everyday, and I'm sure we've all been there, but generally there's another side to that particular coin.

 

Trading is a fairly difficult undertaking because your opponents edge is a lot bigger than most people imagine. Any post that attempts to reinforce the crazy idea that you get rich by making money every day needs to be challenged.

 

I'm no advocate of martingale position sizing, and its somewhat of a shock to see it being pimped by a moderator (well actually it isn't, but that's because I'm a cynical old git who knows how the industry works) but the adoption of the mindset of a professional gambler is in my opinion at least, almost a pre requisite to trading successfully.

 

I'm very clear on my position, I gamble, and I manage that process, and I make money by capitalizing on good luck.

 

There are are gamblers who rely on luck , but there are traders who rely on skill to extract pips out of the market.Compare this analogy :A gambling butcher and a skilled surgeon are allowed to operate on two identical operations , both are asked to remove an ulcer bypass.The skilled surgeon knows exactly where to make the skillful cuts , the gambling butcher cuts and cuts and cuts in all places and his luck finally finds the place to cut the ulcer bypass.

 

Gentlemen I rest my case between between gamblers and traders.The gambler does not need encouragement , he needs help to become skilled at doing the job correctly.

 

Of course skilled gamblers can make a living by betting the roof , but any gambler will blow their roof without making a living.We need not tell an unskilled person how to risk more for same reward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO

This is the poorest advice I have read anywhere , considering a trader can have 16 to 20 losses in a row .80 % of potential trend breakouts fail and are fakes and technical analysis is junk science .

 

If a trader starts with even 2 % per trade , it is quick blow out of the account.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the poorest advice I have read anywhere.....

 

There's some very stiff competition out there, its not the worst advice I've seen, its not even in the same ballpark as some of the intelligent nonsense that's peddled by industry shills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
There's some very stiff competition out there, its not the worst advice I've seen, its not even in the same ballpark as some of the intelligent nonsense that's peddled by industry shills.

 

If some one wants to post this type of stuff , at least they should do some intelligent invention , then post here.There is a version of a betting sequence which works for trading , but the information about it is private.

 

Here is the problem with most systems traders and discretionary traders , they surely make pips every week with skill ........like 30 to 50 pips weekly , then they blow it with 2 mistakes.:haha::haha: There are systems out there which make pips or points , they screw up with human errors and trading mindsets , hence need for martingaling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If some one wants to post this type of stuff , at least they should do some intelligent invention , then post here.There is a version of a betting sequence which works for trading , but the information about it is private..

 

I do think that particular betting sequences can form part of an edge

 

Different kinds of trading approaches do have an influence on the distribution of returns, and there are betting sequences that can be exploited to capitalize on long streaks of consecutive wins for example, or alternatively, to reduce losses in long runs of consecutive losses.

 

I think if your attempting to engineering a particular distribution in gains and losses, it might be worth taking a closer look

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
I do think that particular betting sequences can form part of an edge

 

Different kinds of trading approaches do have an influence on the distribution of returns, and there are betting sequences that can be exploited to capitalize on long streaks of consecutive wins for example, or alternatively, to reduce losses in long runs of consecutive losses.

 

I think if your attempting to engineering a particular distribution in gains and losses, it might be worth taking a closer look

 

Assume these as facts , market trends only 20 % of the time , 80 % of potential trending entries fail or just about break even.. Devise you position size , so if you have 4 to 8 non performers or losses , you can eventually recover the losses and can survive up to 30 losses in a draw down.

 

It can be done , rather a martingale revenge trading system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assume these as facts , market trends only 20 % of the time , 80 % of potential trending entries fail or just about break even.. Devise you position size , so if you have 4 to 8 non performers or losses , you can eventually recover the losses and can survive up to 30 losses in a draw down.

 

It can be done , rather a martingale revenge trading system.

 

again the 80/20 discussion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assume these as facts , market trends only 20 % of the time , 80 % of potential trending entries fail or just about break even.. Devise you position size , so if you have 4 to 8 non performers or losses , you can eventually recover the losses and can survive up to 30 losses in a draw down.

 

It can be done , rather a martingale revenge trading system.

 

Yes the 80/20 :doh: :offtopic:

Most trend following systems when tested might be more like 40/60 or 30/70

Trend following systems that might have a ratio of winners to losers can get this same ratio in a trending market depending on what the markets do.....rattling off markets only trend 20% of the time is pointless.

Its as worthless as saying 80% of options expire OTM therefore its a low risk trade to sell them,

Even with these ratios - when markets do trend and these are of course long term trend following systems - not applicable to day trading - they actually make good money without a doubling up of the losers (Matingale system). In fact they cut their losses.

 

trend following as a strategy is usually about as far from martingale as you can get.

 

Maybe this comment says it all "There is a version of a betting sequence which works for trading , but the information about it is private." - the secret sauce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
I do think that particular betting sequences can form part of an edge

 

Different kinds of trading approaches do have an influence on the distribution of returns, and there are betting sequences that can be exploited to capitalize on long streaks of consecutive wins for example, or alternatively, to reduce losses in long runs of consecutive losses.

 

I think if your attempting to engineering a particular distribution in gains and losses, it might be worth taking a closer look

 

Get a 50 % hit rate system 48% after spread , use a betting sequence that can cope with 28 losses and can recover the losses ,you get a profit at the end .Is that not an edge?Most 50 /50 systems will not have more than 10 losses in a row , and not more than 25 in a draw down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
The Martingale system is a probability theory that’s been popular in gambling since the eighteenth century, and more recently in forex trading. The strategy can be used in any situation where there is an even money (or close to even money) outcome – for example, a coin toss, or red/black on a roulette board.

 

The idea of the Martingale System is to double the bet after every losing bet, so that when a win eventually comes, all losses are recouped, along with a small profit from the initial bet. Of course, for the system to work, a very large bankroll is required to counter the possibility of long losing streaks.

 

The Martingale system originated in France during the eighteenth century, it wasn’t until the twentieth century, however, that the theory was examined more closely by probability theorist and mathematician Paul Lévy. However Lévy did not use the term “Martingale” – this was introduced in 1939 by Ville, who saw the similarities between Levy’s research and the earlier French betting strategies of the same name.

 

The Martingale System is often applied in forex trading either manually or through expert advisors run on the MT4 trader platform. The system is attractive to new investors because on the surface it seems like a failsafe method for making decisions. But as the Investopedia definition of the Martingale system describes, it’s a “very risky method of investing” because of the inherent risk of a losing run that’s long enough to bankrupt the investor.

 

Unlike forex trading, where more control can be exercised in the system’s use, in roulette the Martingale system actually has a negative expectation because of the house edge in the form of the zero (and in some variations the double zero). This house edge adds the extra chance of a loss every 36 spins.

 

Using roulette as an example of the inherent risk of the system, in 73 spins there is a 50.3% chance that you will lose 6 “coin flip” (e.g. red vs black) spins in a row. This means that if your initial wager is $10, you would need to be placing a wager of $640 (after $10 + $20 + $40 + $80 + $160 + $320) on the seventh spin just to win back your original $10 bet. Of course, losing streaks even greater than six are also frequent. See this article for more information about the Martingale system in roulette.

 

There’s really no such thing as a free lunch when it comes to systems like this, and the Martingale system is deceptively risky. The expected value is zero, and actually less than zero when it is being used on something that’s 50-50 yet the house is taking a percentage, such as in roulette. The zero expected value is just not very apparent because the downside seems so improbable, and yet is so catastrophic when it actually occurs.

 

Whilst it may seem on the surface to be an infallible strategy, the Martingale system is inherently flawed because of the huge bank required and the inherent risk of losing that bank. Long losing streaks are far more common than intuition would suggest, and the small rewards from winning the vast majority of the time are quickly offset when a long losing streak occurs.

 

In contrast to roulette the Martingale system is less risky when used in forex trading than in gambling. This is for several reasons, including:

• Expert advisors can be configured to incorporate stop losses

• Unlike the pure randomness of a coin toss, outcomes in the world of forex trading will to some extent depend on previous outcomes, making very long losing streaks less likely

• The system can be adapted to be more sophisticated in order to deal with the greater complexities of the forex world, making it more of a variation on the traditional Martingale, and potentially profitable.

 

One of the main downsides of using the Martingale system in forex trading is ending up on the wrong side of a down-trending market. Without proper stop losses in place to protect your position, the trades could continue to be executed by the expert advisor with the market experiencing a downswing, which could quickly put you in a position where a small starting trade has grown by several thousand per cent.

 

If you’d like to experiment with some variations of the Martingale system in your own trading, it’s a good idea to try it with a demo account first and let it run over a large sample size so you can get a good idea for the potential for long streaks. Even after getting a firm understanding of how the Martingale system can work for forex trading, it’s still a good idea to make sure you are well leveraged before trying anything automated using an EA.

 

Thanks to MapleLeafCasino.CA - A Complete Online Casino Resource Guide for Canadian Online Casinos for their help with this article.

 

We should be allowed to see the IQ of S M.

5aa711f6b6470_pipson25july.thumb.png.1a43144649e5112eb21b5b85e0ba3f80.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.