Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Doubling-Up with Indicators

Recommended Posts

One of the things that attracts newcomers to technical analysis is the wide variety of indicators that can be used to assess price data in a more objective way. What most people don’t know is that the logic behind many of the most commonly used indicators is relatively similar. This should not be a total surprise because, in some cases, collections of indicators have been created by the same person (J. Welles Wilder would be a primary example).

 

It is, however, possible to make small alterations to these indicators and change the number and type of signals that are received. To take this approach even further, it is possible to plot multiple readings of the same indicator and use the comparative results as a basis for trading decisions. When exiting a trade, market conditions will never be what they were when the trade was opened. At the same time, psychological factors will often cause to hold onto trades too long (usually when markets are working against a trade), or to exit too quickly (once small gains are finally seen).

 

Both of these scenarios have clear drawbacks and can quickly lead to substantial losses. Indicators can help traders avoid some of these situations because these tools arm you with information that describes when a trending move has reached completion and is ready to reverse. For these reasons, it is preferable to wait for technical signals to materialize before pulling the trigger to close a trade, rather than relying on emotional reactions to do the same.

 

Using the MACD to Measure Trends

 

One of the most common indicator tools used by traders is the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), as it helps to enhance the probabilities in determining the lengths of trending moves. But which parameters should be plotted on the charts? The default settings in trading stations will generally call for the following: The MACD Line subtracts a 12-day EMA from a 26-day EMA. The Signal Line is a 9-day EMA of the MACD Line itself, and acts as a “signal” for trades (identifies potential turning points). Finally, the MACD Histogram is plotted, and shows as either “positive” or “negative.” The Histogram is positive if the MACD rises above the Signal Line. The Histogram is negative if the MACD falls below the Signal Line. These elements can be seen in the charted example.

 

The job of the MACD indicator is to help traders establish trades and then hold those positions until the current move has run its course. This is important because traders will typically spend much more time on their trade entry decisions than they do with their trade exit decisions. While it is a good idea to spend time with your entries, it is ultimately your exits that will determine your level of profit or loss. Tools like the MACD are designed to maximize your strategic decisions and fine tune your exit levels within the larger trend.

 

Understanding the Signals

 

The MACD sends signals to traders in a few different ways. As the name suggests, the indicator focuses on the convergence and divergence seen between the two moving averages. Convergence is found when the moving averages move close together. Divergence is seen when the moving farther apart. The Signal Line is simply an average of the MACD Line.

 

Because of this, the Signal Line will lag behind the MACD Line. When the MACD Line crosses above the signal line, positive momentum is expected and buy positions should be initiated. When the MACD Line crosses below the signal line, negative momentum is expected and sell positions should be initiated. Illustrated examples can be seen in the second chart.

 

In addition to this, buy signals are generated when the MACD Line crosses above the histogram. When the MACD Line crosses back below the histogram, momentum is negative and this is a signal to sell an asset. These signals help traders to know whether or not a specific price move has enough momentum to warrant a new position. As always, multiple signals (such as a Signal Line crossover, combined with a Histogram crossover), add to the validity of any potential positions.

 

Doubling the Indicator for Exits

 

Once you have a firm understanding of how the indicator works, we can change some of the parameters to work off of the traditional way position exits are constructed. In most cases, traders will use the same logic for entering MACD positions as what was seen when the trade idea was initiated (for example, a Signal Line or Histogram crossover). Unfortunately, this will create many scenarios where the trader will exit a position before the entire move is complete. So, while the MACD is helpful in these areas, there are still ways to improve and capture a larger portion of each move.

 

This can be done by adding an additional plotted MACD. The reasoning here is that the faster MACD (which is more sensitive to price changes) can be used to generate signals for position entries (as this helps you spot developing or changing trends). The slower MACD (which is less sensitive to price changes) can then be added to your charts. To do this, you will need to change the parameters when making the addition (as it would make no sense to again use the default settings). The initial MACD would show the difference between the 12-day and 26-day moving averages.

 

For the slower MACD, we can raise this to show the difference between the 19-day and 39-day moving averages. The Signal Line can be kept constant as a 9-day average of the MACD. The signals generated by this additional MACD plot can be used for exiting positions. So, for example, if we are in a long position, and the second MACD plot shows a negative cross of the Signal Line and/or a cross below the Histogram, the position can be closed on the expectation that the initial bull trend is reaching its end. The parameters for second MACD can be entered fairly easily using the “properties” area in your trading station.

 

Once this is done, you will notice both MACD readings serve different ends. The faster MACD is useful in that it is key for allowing us to spot new trends in their early phases. This indicator is less useful for trade exits, however, because it will often lead many traders to exit their positions before most of the trending move has completed. When we add a slower MACD to our charts, fewer signals are generated. In addition to this, the slower MACD will give you an idea of the broader picture. So when counter trend signals are generated in the slower MACD plot (for example, a sell signal in an uptrend or a buy signal in a downtrend) if becomes a better idea to exit the position and capture your profits before they are given back.

 

Conclusion

 

Indicator tools are an excellent way of viewing price action in more objective ways. In many cases, however, these indicators can lead us to exit positions well before the full trend moves unfold, and this can lead to large reductions in profits. But when we double up on our indicators (and extend the time periods for their measurements), we can get a broader picture of when trends are actually coming to an end. For the MACD, its creator (Gerald Appel) actually recommended that traders use multiple plots of the indicator but this is rarely something that most traders today would even consider.

Capture.PNG.aea6e39a47ac4dc9efcefccc0cb5e0cf.PNG

Capture2.PNG.15d67adf09b3565ab4771f1236e053c4.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main challenge with the approach of using multiple indicators is that the trader lacks the basic understand of exactly what the indicator is supposed to indicate (a mathmatical or numerical measurement of [whatever] Even with this knowledge, it is even more difficult to trade because the trader does not have the confidence to enter trades due to the lack of consistency in the indicator's signal. In this case, the trader is using the indicator as a prediction tool, and is unlikely to wrap around any type of money management to control the risk, let alone understand the entry and exit process.

 

Is it a consistent set of entries and exits? Or does it change with each setup? Are all the exceptions known before entering? These are just some of the more important aspects of real trading to consider. Multiple indicators usually add to the confusion of predicting market direction, not remove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The main challenge with the approach of using multiple indicators is that the trader lacks the basic understand of exactly what the indicator is supposed to indicate (a mathmatical or numerical measurement of [whatever] Even with this knowledge, it is even more difficult to trade because the trader does not have the confidence to enter trades due to the lack of consistency in the indicator's signal. In this case, the trader is using the indicator as a prediction tool, and is unlikely to wrap around any type of money management to control the risk, let alone understand the entry and exit process.

 

Is it a consistent set of entries and exits? Or does it change with each setup? Are all the exceptions known before entering? These are just some of the more important aspects of real trading to consider. Multiple indicators usually add to the confusion of predicting market direction, not remove it.

 

Good points. I agree. I like to add the risk of missing the best trend when using multiple indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of the things that attracts newcomers to technical analysis is the wide variety of indicators that can be used to assess price data in a more objective way. .......

 

Interesting idea Richard. Thanks.

Can you please explain how to get 2 Macd's into same panel. I can drag & drop another type of indicator onto the Macd panel but not a 2nd Macd. I must be doing something very basic.

Cheers:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.