Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Crude8

Edge

Recommended Posts

Hello gentlemen i need your guidance in determining if trading system posses some edge.

i have been a scalper in commodities and i have incorporated a new approach which is sort of intraday positional trading and its possible to scale it up to 500 - 1000 lots based on my unscientific observations , unlike back testing or real time simulation i implemented it live on 1 lot straight away without any scientific approach , i am hoping i may get help in this forum who can conduct a thorough scientific dissection if it has some edge or its just fluke

The results are as follows - After 3 weeks

 

Number Of trades - 176

Winning trades - 86

Loosing trades - 90

Winning% - 49%

Loosing% - 51%

Average Win Amount - 1112

Average Loss Amount - 373

Average Win Trade Time - 76 Minutes

Average Loss Trade Time - 32 Minutes

Average Win/Average Loss ratio - 3.05

Profit Factor - 2.86

Expectancy - 355

 

 

Before starting i didn't used to measure any statistics and i found few online which i complied , used these formulas

Expectancy = (Probability of Win * Average Win) – (Probability of Loss * Average Loss)

Profit Factor = (Avg Win/Avg Loss)* Win%/(1-Win%)

 

My question is obviously there are traders who are more into statistics than myself , i need your help to see if my trading does have an edge

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crude8,

 

Based on the figures you provide, then it is fairly unequivocal that the strategy has had an edge over the period you have been trading it. This does not mean that it will continue to perform in this way. Even random entries/exits tend to produce suprisingly long strings of profitability and drawdown.

 

I, and many others here, could test this for you over a longer period but . . .

 

(a) you have to fully disclose the strategy, which you might consider your own intellectual property and not wish to share, and

 

(b) backtested results do not always correspond to the results that can be realised in real trading due to the difficulty in attaining limit fills and/or the spread/slippage associated with other order types, all of which can have a dramatic impact on perfomance.

 

If you're trading a single contract/lot and the risks associated with this are not an issue, and you have already realised a modest profit using this strategy, then my suggestion is that you look at position sizing approaches that will allow you to continue to trade with increasing size, but remove the possibility of giving back all your profit should the strategy begin to fail. Trading in and out of your own equity curve could be one way to do this.

 

I hope that's helpful, and I'm sure you'll get plenty more advice in due course.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply, i have traded only 1 lot live but i have implemented a position sizing algorithm which i have simulated during the course of last 3 weeks, Average Sizing in simulated environment varies between 1-4 lots depending upon my equity and average size comes out to 2.5 lots per market. Unscientifically speaking 1 lot result can be easily replicated on 100 lots per market BUT off course i am not financially ready for that yet.

I do not wish to disclose the strategy on public forum but i can share it privately. The statistics i provided to you were net of costs and slippages. Chance of strategy failing seems limited as majority amount of analysis is discretionary and even if i were to automate the execution , the speculation bias would be given at my discretion , say for example i consider the market a short sell - the algo will take only sell signals & stay flat during buy signal (rather than being long) , usually i have a large timeframe employed which ensures that i don't get scared by counter trend movement in smaller timeframes as by logic i would be flat during those times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for the reply, i have traded only 1 lot live but i have implemented a position sizing algorithm which i have simulated during the course of last 3 weeks, Average Sizing in simulated environment varies between 1-4 lots depending upon my equity and average size comes out to 2.5 lots per market. Unscientifically speaking 1 lot result can be easily replicated on 100 lots per market BUT off course i am not financially ready for that yet.

I do not wish to disclose the strategy on public forum but i can share it privately. The statistics i provided to you were net of costs and slippages. Chance of strategy failing seems limited as majority amount of analysis is discretionary and even if i were to automate the execution , the speculation bias would be given at my discretion , say for example i consider the market a short sell - the algo will take only sell signals & stay flat during buy signal (rather than being long) , usually i have a large timeframe employed which ensures that i don't get scared by counter trend movement in smaller timeframes as by logic i would be flat during those times.

 

Hi Crude8,

 

Glad that was helpful.

 

You remark that "majority amount of analysis is discretionary" - this will not be possible to program, so I am doubtful that testing will be an option for you.

 

If you wish to PM me details I can try and run simple tests of the strategy when I have time and if the strategy does not require extensive coding.

 

Kind regards,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello gentlemen i need your guidance in determining if trading system posses some edge.

i have been a scalper in commodities and i have incorporated a new approach which is sort of intraday positional trading and its possible to scale it up to 500 - 1000 lots based on my unscientific observations , unlike back testing or real time simulation i implemented it live on 1 lot straight away without any scientific approach , i am hoping i may get help in this forum who can conduct a thorough scientific dissection if it has some edge or its just fluke

The results are as follows - After 3 weeks

 

Number Of trades - 176

Winning trades - 86

Loosing trades - 90

Winning% - 49%

Loosing% - 51%

Average Win Amount - 1112

Average Loss Amount - 373

Average Win Trade Time - 76 Minutes

Average Loss Trade Time - 32 Minutes

Average Win/Average Loss ratio - 3.05

Profit Factor - 2.86

Expectancy - 355

 

 

Before starting i didn't used to measure any statistics and i found few online which i complied , used these formulas

Expectancy = (Probability of Win * Average Win) – (Probability of Loss * Average Loss)

Profit Factor = (Avg Win/Avg Loss)* Win%/(1-Win%)

 

My question is obviously there are traders who are more into statistics than myself , i need your help to see if my trading does have an edge

 

Regards

 

Based on what other people say who are considered experts, 176 trades for intraday trading is a very small sample. You might have been lucky simply speaking and the system has no edge. If you want to find out if you have en edge you will need to do some serious statistical work like for example is done in this blog for a daily system Significance of a System For Trading SPY | Price Action Lab Blog

 

Also if you can figure out your Sharpe ratio it will be very good. It must be > 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a scalper i can make upto 500 trades in a day IF conditions warrants it in Oil/Natgas.

This system is not really a system per se more of sort of like one of my side projects for intraday positional trades with bias, as a scalper i really don't care where it is(market direction) as long as i can manage to keep my avg buy cost < avg sell cost.

Like i have mentioned before i concentrate on income rather than statistics and i have never much paid attention which i am changing now off course. I will look over at the link you have provided and report back. Although i think i have been in this business long enough to know that having a accuracy above 50% doesn't actually guarantee an edge.

In India our trading platforms don't provide much statistics from our broker end apart from simple buy/sell statements

Edited by Crude8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I downloaded a excel sheet just now and filled in the values in it and i got this result

 

Avg Annual Risk-Free Rate - 7.5%

Average Annual Returns - 16.12%

Standard Deviation - 0.01

Sharpe Ratio - 6.40

 

Instead of years i entered weekly returns (3 weeks) , i can do this again tomorrow for each day return (14 days out of which 12 days green and 2 days red) , i will continue to monitor this and i will have more data from this week as well.

Okay gentlemen have a profitable week ahead, i am of to sleep now , i trade (sometimes overtrade :doh:) for 12-14 hours so i might not get a chance to post until next friday.

I am getting infrastructure in place so that i can understand from my scalping statistics where/when/why i am over trading and hopefully this method turns out to have edge rather than luck so that i can move above the scalping world and relax a little!

Edited by Crude8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hope you guys had a great week , i sure did and here i have my full 4 weeks results

 

Number Of Trades - 267

Winning Trades - 135

Loosing Trades - 132

Win% - 50.5%

Loss% - 49.5%

Avg Win/Avg Loss Ratio - 2.96

Avg Win Trade Time - 75 Minutes

Avg Loss Trade Time - 30 Minutes

Profitable Trading Days - 84.21% [16 out of 19]

Loosing Trading Days - 15.79% [3 out of 19]

Profit Factor - 3.02

Expectancy - $ 6.76

 

i may be calculating sharpe ratio wrongly but it sure is coming at 6.88, is this possible ? well this week i inquired about algorithmic trading and the cost is coming around $500 per month for the server which they are saying will be installed at the broker end, not sure about other products yet but i am keen on setting up my automated routine by September ,lets see if i am able to find an optimal fit for the wallet as i think $500 per month is pretty stiff . Whats is your opinion about the algo costs ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
well this week i inquired about algorithmic trading and the cost is coming around $500 per month for the server which they are saying will be installed at the broker end, not sure about other products yet but i am keen on setting up my automated routine by September ,lets see if i am able to find an optimal fit for the wallet as i think $500 per month is pretty stiff . Whats is your opinion about the algo costs ?

 

Depends on how dependent on speed it is - there are algo alternatives that a lot less expensive than that.

The other factor to consider is also the overall combined cost of such algos and brokerage v a simple algo and retail brokerage. Always hard to say and it is simply something you have to work out based on volume and speed of trades - plus dont forget it is something that is moving rapidly and so always worth watching every quarter as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i suffered a draw down of about -2.89% last week & my accuracy was 38.75% last week and i was winning 3 times i was loosing but due to costs and more looser, i ended down which i covered in 1 day (Monday) for equity & 2 days (Tuesday) for commodities & this week was one of the best weeks in my live trading for this system & i have been trading it for 29 trading days and have 80% winning days & 20% loosing days :) Overall accuracy is 49% while this week 60% were winners

Have a profitable next week Cheers!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
As a scalper i can make upto 500 trades in a day IF conditions warrants it in Oil/Natgas.

This system is not really a system per se more of sort of like one of my side projects for intraday positional trades with bias, as a scalper i really don't care where it is(market direction) as long as i can manage to keep my avg buy cost < avg sell cost.

Like i have mentioned before i concentrate on income rather than statistics and i have never much paid attention which i am changing now off course. I will look over at the link you have provided and report back. Although i think i have been in this business long enough to know that having a accuracy above 50% doesn't actually guarantee an edge.

In India our trading platforms don't provide much statistics from our broker end apart from simple buy/sell statements

 

There is no edge here in averaging down etc.500 trades is for clueless traders , not skilled traders .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no edge here in averaging down etc.500 trades is for clueless traders , not skilled traders .

 

Yup i am a clueless trader :) some of my best and rewarding trades have been done this way.

Staying at topic i have been following my system (semi-automated strategy) quite rigorously and i have come to except that what really matters is a positive expectancy over accuracy and analysis. Cheers!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest OILFXPRO
Yup i am a clueless trader :) some of my best and rewarding trades have been done this way.

Staying at topic i have been following my system (semi-automated strategy) quite rigorously and i have come to except that what really matters is a positive expectancy over accuracy and analysis. Cheers!!

 

Broker and rebates and their agents spreading the holy grail eating up spreads .:rofl::rofl:

 

2 high probability trades a day will give same result., rather than 500.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yup i am a clueless trader :) some of my best and rewarding trades have been done this way.

Staying at topic i have been following my system (semi-automated strategy) quite rigorously and i have come to except that what really matters is a positive expectancy over accuracy and analysis. Cheers!!

 

I agree with the last part........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i am currently live on 3 strategies :-

 

Pair trade btw energy [i take 1 or 2 high probability trades in this]

Semi-Automated intra trend following [5 -8 trades per market on metals ]

Tape reading trades or scalps via dom [100-200 per market IF and only only IF crude oil is active]

 

 

3rd one the tape reading one occurs probably once in a quarter where in a day i might make 200-250 trades each in oil & natgas.

You know i have exchange membership in mcx , commissions are not to much for me :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.