Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

tmbaru

Why Successful Traders Use Fibonacci Retracements

Recommended Posts

Re Static or dynamic

 

1) Lines based on price - eg traditional support and resistance levels or consolidation zones (try Auction Markets). Static ie once formed, it doesn’t move up and down (much)

 

2) Lines based on mathematical derivations of price - eg fibonacci levels or "daily pivots" (try Red Team, Green Team). Static based on previously formed markets pivots

 

3) Lines partially or wholly based on or derived from non price data - eg MP points of control or VWAPs (try Trading with Market Profile) Static…

 

4) Time based support and resistance. The ‘horizontal’ line will be ‘dynamic’, the vertical ones not so much

 

The key to any straight or crooked 'line' on any chart - no matter what you name it or how you derive / program / calculate / project it – is how much it ‘matters’ when at the time it is approached… it could be as strong as the wall of china in the moment… or it’s there but it could have the strength of a frkn jet vapor trail

It's better to know it's there than not

that is

Why Successful Traders Use Fibonacci Retracements

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fibonacciretracement....which is an established on this field have this to say about 'Fibonacci Retracement'

 

Definition of 'Fibonacci Retracement'

A term used in technical analysis that refers to areas of support (price stops going lower) or resistance (price stops going higher). The Fibonacci retracement is the potential retracement of a financial asset's original move in price. Fibonacci retracements use horizontal lines to indicate areas of support or resistance at the key Fibonacci levels before it continues in the original direction. These levels are created by drawing a trendline between two extreme points and then dividing the vertical distance by the key Fibonacci ratios of 23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8% and 100%.

.

.

Someone should correct me if this is not the position....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More on 'Fibonacci Retracement'....

Fibonacci retracement is a very popular tool used by many technical traders to help identify strategic places for transactions to be placed, target prices or stop losses. The notion of retracement is used in many indicators such as Tirone levels, Gartley patterns, Elliott Wave theory and more. After a significant price movement up or down, the new support and resistance levels are often at or near these lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lemme see how many Billionaire investors out there use Fibonacci? the answer to this question would most probably be "ZERO".

Genius.:doh: It pays to read closely.

 

Well except for a couple that were just mentioned in Mitsu's above post. Can't get any closer unless it was in your own post.:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Genius.:doh: It pays to read closely.

 

Well except for a couple that were just mentioned in Mitsu's above post. Can't get any closer unless it was in your own post.:o

 

Steve Cohen uses a special indicator called insider trading. It works well for those who have access to it.

 

Buffet, though probably not an inside trader, gets special deals, purchasing GS Preferred issue stock paying a 10% dividend, backed by the faith and credit of the USA. As Far as I know, we didn't have access to that purchase or access to the information that AIG would use its tarp money to pay off its bets with GS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lemme see how many Billionaire investors out there use Fibonacci? the answer to this question would most probably be "ZERO".

:rofl:

 

Seriously though, we are talking in here about traders, not investors. Important distinction.

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex/13692-characteristics-traders-versus-investors-forex-markets-2.html#post156184

etc

 

 

...and when you hear Buffet say: “I realized that technical analysis didn’t work when I turned the chart upside down and didn’t get a different answer,” it's obvious his proclivities and strengths are in playing the monetary system, etc. and it's a good thing for him he didn't try to become a 'trader'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve Cohen uses a special indicator called insider trading. It works well for those who have access to it....

True but that is like saying Barry Bonds was on steroids when he sets home run records.

 

He still would have been damn close without the "juice" though.

 

Break a rule or a law and there are consequences of course.

 

But SAC is an enormous trading firm that didn't get that way purely from insider info.

Edited by SunTrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True but that is like saying Barry Bonds was on steroids when he sets home run records.

 

He still would have been damn close without the "juice" though.

 

Break a rule or a law and there are consequences of course.

 

But SAC is an enormous trading firm that didn't get that way purely from insider info.

 

I don't know how SAC got that way. You may be correct that it wasn't from insider trading. You also may not be correct. Those guys need to provide return at all costs. The easiest way to make money is with tomorrow's paper.

 

Homeruns in Baseball? Eye and hand coordination. You might or might not be shocked at how helpful growth hormones are. Hard to decide how much had to do with Juice in his case. It could be that he would have done just as well without the juice, but we will never know and he lives with his decisions and the stigma of doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know how SAC got that way. You may be correct that it wasn't from insider trading. You also may not be correct.....

$14 billion dollar hedge fund with 800 employees which was started in 1992 takes an awful lot of insider info to get to that level and a long time before being discovered - if it was all an illusion and not some substance behind it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
$14 billion dollar hedge fund with 800 employees which was started in 1992 takes an awful lot of insider info to get to that level and a long time before being discovered - if it was all an illusion and not some substance behind it.

 

It certainly could have been a good run, getting away with murder. All I know about SAC is what I read in the headlines. I do know that the hedge-fund business is intensely competitive. I can certainly understand why these guys would want to press the envelope to remain a forerunner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an SPX example, admitedly an ideal one, of fib time and price retracements coming together. Both down swings 43 days, 2nd swing 61.8% time retracement of previous up move of 72 days although it overshots bottom by a day. Good enough for govmint work.

 

Then there is 61.8% price retracement of up move. This "missed" hitting exact level by less than 3 points.

 

But was this the cause of the market bottoming - and ripping the bull market higher 300 points ?

 

I don't know but I also don't care.

 

I only care about having probablilites on my side.

 

And fibs are one, of many ways, to do this.

SPXfib.thumb.png.5d7c32654bf6402055c84524233aee7b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For the 100th time...............................................................................:doh:

 

It's because many traders are unsure whether the relevant fib level is 61.8 or 38.2, so they add them together and divide by two to get an average retracement level of 50 . . .

 

:rofl:

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:rofl:

 

Seriously though, we are talking in here about traders, not investors. Important distinction.

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex/13692-characteristics-traders-versus-investors-forex-markets-2.html#post156184

etc

 

 

...and when you hear Buffet say: “I realized that technical analysis didn’t work when I turned the chart upside down and didn’t get a different answer,” it's obvious his proclivities and strengths are in playing the monetary system, etc. and it's a good thing for him he didn't try to become a 'trader'.

 

Yes for traders it may do. I personally dont use any technicals for my charting cause the chart looking at the chart is enough to see whats happening with the price, my original perception was the large capital investment market where almost all technicals fail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I posted three weeks' worth of charts that illustrated a method which yielded a 79% win rate and 90% profit, and the resulting NQ trade is now 200pts in profit. That's after several years of profitable trading.

 

But I guess it depends on how one defines "useful".

 

DB,

 

I would really be interested in checking that out. Would you mind telling me where those posts are?

 

thanks a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question-

How do you know when a problem is too big to solve for yourself?

When you need someone else to help solve it for you..........?

 

DB has more than 3200 posts over 7 years. I don't have any way of knowing when he made those posts or in which thread.

 

You really think it's unforgivable laziness for me to ask for help finding a needle in a haystack?

 

It's quite possible you're a jerk dude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
$14 billion dollar hedge fund with 800 employees which was started in 1992 takes an awful lot of insider info to get to that level and a long time before being discovered - if it was all an illusion and not some substance behind it.

 

Cohen Gets Subpoena in SAC Capital Trading Inquiry - NYTimes.com

 

 

Even Madoff was legitimate for a time if even for a fleeting moment. I suppose too that SAC was legitimate for a period. Likely, a longer period of time than Madoff. But, then the need for yield, the lure of easy money, and uncontrolled pride came together and formed the perfect storm. I know I am convicting him prematurely, but when SAC and RICO are in the same article, it is not good. Rico is generally used with criminal organizations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RICO suave hmmm. Yea he's guilty for sure. Throw away the key.

 

Wait, what about me? I went to the same high school (Far Rockaway High) as Madoff.

 

True but just not at the same time. Phew!, might be safe. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Question-

How do you know when a problem is too big to solve for yourself?

When you need someone else to help solve it for you..........?

 

DB has 3200 posts over 7 years. I don't have any way of knowing when those posts were made or in which thread they were made. I spent some time searching for them but didn't have any luck. I really don't think I'm being lazy or expecting others to do my work for me.

 

If anybody can direct me to the aforementioned posts, it'd be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Given the number of levels, and how far the "bounce" can be from them and still "count", it would be next to impossible not to be successful trading them.

 

Of course, it's also possible to trade successfully by putting on a tinfoil hat and receiving trading signals from Mars.

 

Damn DB...don't give away my system. I am about to open up the Tinfoil Hat Academy of Trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YertleTurtle gazillion thanks for the clarification. It has made me to dig deeper about Fibonacci Retracement and now has an in-depth understanding on the topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Re Static or dynamic

 

 

If moving a data point from a larger timeframe to a smaller timeframe results in converting what might have been dynamic on the larger frame into a series of non updating values for multiple bars then transposing that value to the smaller timeframe assures it is static even if it is dynamic in the larger frame. Any number that remains constant while OHLC are dynamic is going to be static relative to the current timeframe.

 

I appreciate that you gave this idea some thought. It was intended to make everyone think. It's not the subject of numerous other threads. It's been suggested in this thread that there aren't enough ideas filling the void created by running out the scammers. It's also been said we shouldn't be critical of others unless we understand the specific nature of what they're doing.

 

This is my attempt to share an alternative view. It's ok to judge the methods of others and dismiss those methods as weak. When comparing apples to apples, all other things being equal, choose dynamic. Not all horizontal numbers are invalid. But given this is a competitive endeavor why consider anything static?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fibonacci analysis has become an essential tool to the modern trader. Some traders may be skeptical regarding the unique and slightly abstract way Fibonacci retracements and extensions analyze the market but ultimately all a trader needs to be aware of is whether they are reliable and accurate.

 

The principle use of Fibonacci retracements and extensions is to project strong lines of resistance and support for a security. Armed with these indications a trader can employ a basic but often successful trading technique by placing pending entries into the market.

 

When deployed properly the Fibonacci retracements and extensions predict significant lines of support and resistance of any security being analyzed. The retracements and extensions are laid over the top of a candlestick chart and if done accurately the resistance and support can be clearly seen. The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits one of these lines or pass it and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits one of these lines or pass it and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information.

 

You might want to rephrase this since your statement can be changed only slightly and provide as much information about price action as the the original version.

 

The price of a security is likely to either rebound when it hits a bunny rabbit or pass the bunny rabbit and if it breaks the support or resistance it is likely to keep on going. This is valuable knowledge for a trader and with a basic technique large profits can be made by playing the market with this information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.