Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TL Staff

How Random is Randomness

Recommended Posts

What are your thoughts on this study? Seems like he is overthinking something rather simple, if you ask me!

 

I was just doing a small study on randomness and came across some interesting results and would like to get some reflection from others.

 

Generated 1048576 coin flips ( "ZERO" or "ONE") randomly using ROUND(RAND(),0)

 

I did this 11 different times. In other words, the above formula was dropped in 11 different columns and generated 1048576 coin flips for each column.

 

Now let's assume that each column is an individual stand-alone trading strategy. I wanted to figure out what the worst/best case scenario could be for a strategy that relied on random buys/sells. Worst/best case scenario that I'm defining in this small study is how many times a win/loss occurred Consecutively. In other words, how many times did the coin flip equal heads consecutively.

 

"Zero" (randomly generated by excel) could either be a win or a loss

"One" (randomly generated by excel) could either be a win or a loss

 

The consecutive win/loss for the 11 stand-alone strategies:

 

Strat1 16

Strat2 20

Strat3 17

Strat4 17

Strat5 18

Strat6 17

Strat7 21

Strat8 18

Start9 17

Start10 17

Start11 18

 

Those results do not seem random to me. So can we argue that if I created more strategies and more random coin flips, there could be a strategy that has a million flips that resulted in a loss each time (since for a coin flip at each flip the odds are 50/50).

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a little unclear what you're asking, but this is basic probability and you can estimate the expected consecutive losses or wins (there is a formula for this).

 

Perhaps you could explain more clearly what you're asking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thoughts.....

first - a random number generator in excel is not exactly random.

second - a truely random number as seeker says can be worked using a formula for what you expect

third - if the markets are really random and you accept that then no strategy will beat the markets therefore you should adopt a passive style of asset allocation.

forth - yes - even in a truely random universe there will at some stage be 1 million (1 or 0)( heads or tails) (wins/loss) that would occur - that is the nature of probability - its highly unlikely to occur but it is stil possible.

fifth - just cause i like to be filthy with my fifth idea is that if you find yourself in the universe go and get laid because it be fantastic because it the place that really unbeleiveable things happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

there could be a strategy that has a million flips that resulted in a loss each time.

 

 

The answer is 'yes'.

 

And with equal probability there could be a million winning flips in succession.

 

But why does this matter in terms of thinking about trading?

 

I disagree with SIUYA's statement: I think that a market that was perfectly random would be incredibly easy to trade. The probability of long runs of similar behaviour would be incredibly small, and you could bet against the continuation of such events.

 

Unfortunately price clearly isn't completely random, and nor is it completely non-random, hence trading is difficult . . .

 

I am taking the needle off my own stuck record now :)

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Came across this post while browsing some private discussion threads, and found it to be interesting on two levels.

 

1. The topic itself regarding "how random is randomness"?

 

2. That people are obsessed with statistics. :) I think some people overcomplicate trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MARKETS ARE NOT RANDOM!!! The market moves up... it moves down... but for the last %$^&* time it's not random. Anyone who can follow a tick chart / volume chart / depth of market / time and sales can see that it's not random... it's buying and selling.... it's not #$$^&&^^&^%&&^%^& random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with SIUYA's statement: I think that a market that was perfectly random would be incredibly easy to trade. The probability of long runs of similar behaviour would be incredibly small, and you could bet against the continuation of such events.

 

 

Good point, and i think this is why the whole debate about randomness is missunderstood.

If everyone thought and knew it was random and the odds easily calculated over the long term.....in which case you are right.....you would only be able to trade against those who are simply gambling as everyone would then have perfect information and know they are gambling, therefore over the long run....blah blah blah.....

 

Basically the pricing mechanism for this should be arbed out if everyone knew and thought it was perfectly random.....so in a perfectly random market would still be incredibly hard to trade as it would simply be luck - that is the whole point of a random market.

Even If the odds cannot be calculated over the long term because the randomness is still unable to be accurately measured, captured and traded (by the very nature of the randonmness being unable to be proedicited)

 

In both cases you cant beat the market - therefore you should be a passive investor and not an active one

 

 

or maybe we could amend the old saying "The Market Can Remain Irrational Longer Than You Can Remain Solvent" by Keynes to --- "the perfectly random will still have some series of long runs more often that you can stay solvent" - which is why even Casinos limit some people and bet sizes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically the pricing mechanism for this should be arbed out if everyone knew and thought it was perfectly random.....so in a perfectly random market would still be incredibly hard to trade as it would simply be luck - that is the whole point of a random market.

.

 

That's not something I had considered. In theory, I suppose, arbing out randmoness would lead to . . . non-random behaviour? I should stop visiting threads like this before 9am :)

 

"the perfectly random will still have some series of long runs more often that you can stay solvent" - which is why even Casinos limit some people and bet sizes

 

For anyone who can be bothered with it, there's a detailed explanation of the maths involved in casino limits and long runs in Ed Thorp's 'Beat the Dealer'.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those interested there is some good theory from William Feller - Wikiquote

 

Its all mind fodder and as probability is all about possibilities and probability maybe most debates will never be solved.....

this might be particularly interesting given all the random talk....

 

"It should be noted that this duration is considerably longer than we naively expect. If two players with 500 dollars each toss a coin until one is ruined, the average duration of the game is 250,000 trials. If a gambler has only one dollar and his adversary has 1000, the average duration is 1000 trials.

Chapter XIV, Random Walk And Ruin Problems, p. 349"

 

.......

Blue - yep i often need a coffee before reality kicks in too :)

Thats what makes a good discussion - often what we think seems reasonable until compared to reality, or even better sometimes we accept reality in one form until we see it in a different way. Maybe some one will one day develop a perfect pricing mechanism.

Its an interesting thing particularly when it comes to gambling, rational thought etc and pricing.

You could guarantee even with a purely random market there would be people who would bet against the odds - and in walks lady luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.