Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Do Or Die

Relative Strength

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

In my other thread http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/10120-relative-strength-internal.html, I introduced the concept of RS. That one will be open for discussions relating to internal relative strength of a stock. In this one I will share some RS concepts which are used by professional investors worldwide. Unlike most of Technical Analysis, RS has been validated and accepted by academicians (the other two important concepts being momentum and mean reversion).

 

For Stocks RS is used to gauge their strength against the entire stock market (through SnP 500, DOW), or against their peer group. CANSLIM is a popular method which uses RS for investing.

 

RS for an industry group/sector is measured against the broader index to measure its upside potential. Sector Rotation Model is the most important work in this regards which shows how different stock sectors perform in different stages of the market.

 

There is a lot of stuff I plan to post related to RS; not just about stocks but all important asset classes; and not just about investing but different time frames for trading.

 

:missy:

DD

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A basic example to get started:

 

In a rising market, most stocks will be dragged along with it and continue to rise. However, there RS may start showing weakness, which means that there is a loss in actual demand (buying) which is being marked by the favorable price increase of the stock. In reality the stock is not keeping with the rest of market, not even costing on the free ride given by the general bullish sentiment in the market. How serious this warning sign can be depends from case to case, because in longer time frames, each market cycle may be different from past ones. In general the stock is likely to ‘roll over’ down once the buying enthusiasm vanishes. In extreme cases, the stock will drop down like a stone once the market tops out.

 

Stock groups behave in a similar fashion. To profit from this analysis, you can exit with profit when the stock is peaking out and safeguard from the cash. Alternatively you can find good short/ultrashort ETFs and enjoy the crash.

 

The best example is the finance stocks which peaked out way before the market during the credit crisis. As seen in attached chart of BAC, its RS started to decline mid-2006, while the market peaked in late 2007.

 

The second chart is of YRCW, picked from discussion in the other thread: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/10184-am-i-doing-right.html#post121967. From prices alone it may seem that the stock is just moving up and down wildly, but the crushed RS indicates that the stock may be in BIG trouble.

 

:missy:

DD

BAC.thumb.png.542709cd6b9a63f47894cd0929d1d3c2.png

YRCW.thumb.png.0f33bc3039530cb470eb611f784b070f.png

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Do or Die,

 

 

can you comment how this lady derive her RS and her moneywave?

 

Joanne Klein (10 Per Page) - Public ChartList - Free Charts - StockCharts.com

 

thank you.

 

Hi,

 

In my other thread http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/10120-relative-strength-internal.html, I introduced the concept of RS. That one will be open for discussions relating to internal relative strength of a stock. In this one I will share some RS concepts which are used by professional investors worldwide. Unlike most of Technical Analysis, RS has been validated and accepted by academicians (the other two important concepts being momentum and mean reversion).

 

For Stocks RS is used to gauge their strength against the entire stock market (through SnP 500, DOW), or against their peer group. CANSLIM is a popular method which uses RS for investing.

 

RS for an industry group/sector is measured against the broader index to measure its upside potential. Sector Rotation Model is the most important work in this regards which shows how different stock sectors perform in different stages of the market.

 

There is a lot of stuff I plan to post related to RS; not just about stocks but all important asset classes; and not just about investing but different time frames for trading.

 

:missy:

DD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello Do or Die,

 

 

can you comment how this lady derive her RS and her moneywave?

 

Joanne Klein (10 Per Page) - Public ChartList - Free Charts - StockCharts.com

 

thank you.

 

Hi,

 

The RS is probably calculated by comparing to market index & peer stocks/etfs. I will have to study atleast 20 charts of her to decrypt it- doubt if it will worth the effort.

 

The "Money Wave" is nothing more than a slight variation of popular stochastics :rofl: (see attached)

 

:missy:

DD

joaane.thumb.png.ccfb06c87d3a5dbf1430b9f0d085f5f8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

The RS is probably calculated by comparing to market index & peer stocks/etfs. I will have to study atleast 20 charts of her to decrypt it- doubt if it will worth the effort.

 

The "Money Wave" is nothing more than a slight variation of popular stochastics :rofl: (see attached)

 

:missy:

DD

Hello Do or Die,

 

i will really appreciate it if you can shed some light on how she create her indicators in the chart.

 

thank you

 

-zhaozilong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i will really appreciate it if you can shed some light on how she create her indicators in the chart.

 

To Clarify:

 

She is a paid member of stockcharts.com and can create custom indicators but you cannot.

 

You can go to any charting website like freestockchart.com and can plot Stochastics with parameters (8,3) to replace her Money Wave.

 

For Relative Strength score refer to YRCW example and my methodology in this post. You can see in the latter example that I posted a list of stocks based on how they have performed relatively during a certain time interval. She is doing exactly the same with an added thin layer for discretionary analysis.

 

As an advice stop hunting for the easy way- plotting the holy grail indicator. Try to work out the methodology- its all basics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I've quantified the concepts discussed in this thread and the RS-Internal one. The three most important factors have been quantified on a scale of -100 to +100. (-100 means extremely bearish while +100 means extremely bullish). There are no fancy formulas used, just the concepts I've stated so far.

 

This is the market state for yesterday close. The RS internal anticipates the immediate move, while the RS with respect to S&P suggests how stronger the mid-term trend is.

 

Comments welcome!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25898&stc=1&d=1314292348

Graph38.thumb.jpg.2c8de548122349db124dc25fdde4a6d3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some changes:

 

  • I found a problem with my earlier normalization method and rectified it (has no change on overall view)
  • Added some colors for easier visualization
  • Would like to add peer group comparison (currently its only with broad market)
  • Would like to refine internal rs

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25910&stc=1&d=1314366631

1.png.cb359c69b172e70b269d4f83e7b57bd8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DJI Components Overview:

 

  • Trend Strength refers to mid-term trend (similar to 50 day moving average)
  • RS Internal refers to immediate expected movement
  • RS (S&P) refers to how well the sector is performing relative to overall market
  • -100 means extremely bearish and +100 means extremely bullish

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=25916&stc=1&d=1314381861

1.thumb.png.f503336084fa9dbea8926ee1937de1ac.png

Edited by Do Or Die

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi do or die,

 

I have been trading some variation of CANSLIM with technicals for around a year at this point.

 

Sector rotation with ETFs is interesting and has been validated through many different groups of people (as you mentioned) backtests.

 

What I am wondering is, to catch the large return potential of equities in the CANSLIM universe, could one employ a top down rotation strategy rotating every month into the top 3 sectors and within each sector into the top 1 or 2 stocks?

 

Looking forward to a reply as well as recomendation where I can obtain any relevant literature.

 

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kidpwrtrader,

 

I'm a little confused by your statement... canslim is not that effective if the stocks are rotated every month, it is used for investing.

 

Regarding resources for research- I cannot recall any. In any case, each business cycle is different in form from the previous one, so theory may not help. You must be tracking stocks and sectors performance, that should help much.

 

BTW Piotroski Score may be of interest:

Piotroski Profits - Forbes.com

The Piotroski Score

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Kidpwrtrader, but I also mentioned that it is for the sake of illustrating the 'edge' or advantage sector rotation provides. People tend to invest in broad market indexes- sector rotation through ETFs definitely goes better than that.

 

But you are one step ahead- tracking individual stocks and not just sector indices. So if you have found a good stock, it's better to hold it unless it hits a trailing stop-loss, or it nullifies the premise on which you invested in the first place. BTW I do not mean trailing stops similar to short-term trading; when we buy a stock for gains over 100% a 30% trailing stop should be good as well.

 

Monthly ETF rotation is for people who cannot afford more than 30 minutes per week or who are absolutely new to stock market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will you be going over this type of investing/trading in addition to the material you currently presented? I would be interested in seeing some insight...

 

See last few posts for example. http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/10509-moment-truth-stock-investors-4.html#post126037

 

As the market stabilizes, Technology and Financials will outperform- they did last week and will continue so until S&P starts crashing again. IBM and AAPL both look good for short-term. For 2-3 months holding, many ETFs mentioned here were selling cheap, so no harm in buying the moment market takes support.

 

Currently I have hardly 20% of money in pure investments, rest is short-term to mid-term trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Do Or Die.

relative strength between entire market and a single stock can be done by simple dividing.

but how to calculate comparative relative strength?

i mean normalization to compare the relative strength of two different stocks.

i've tried 'ROC of Stock / ROC of Entire Market' to achieve this but no luck.

i'm asking that how William O'neil calculated the relative strength score.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean normalization to compare the relative strength of two different stocks.

i've tried 'ROC of Stock / ROC of Entire Market' to achieve this but no luck.

i'm asking that how William O'neil calculated the relative strength score.

Thanks

 

Say you want to compare RS for last 30 days. First calculate % change of stocks in last 30 day . With this data alone you can rank stocks by their relative performance. For a more 'visual' RS score, subtract that by % change of base index in last 30 days.

 

I prefer subtraction to division because division tends to unnecessarily amplify relative performance. I do not recall how O'neil calculates but this is what it is.

 

BTW, are you calculating it in Excel?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTW, are you calculating it in Excel?

 

Thanks for answer.

No i've plotted the RS indicator below price as stockcharts does.

it works pretty good for a single stock. but doesn't work for comparing plural stocks

however i prefer to plotting moving averages of RS together as we normally do on price.

i don't buy stocks when their RS is below 200MA of RS :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excel can be really good... you can get all data from yahoo and templates are around the web for popular indicators. If you can afford some time to learn get a strategy design software like Ninjatrader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Say you want to compare RS for last 30 days. First calculate % change of stocks in last 30 day . With this data alone you can rank stocks by their relative performance. For a more 'visual' RS score, subtract that by % change of base index in last 30 days.

 

I prefer subtraction to division because division tends to unnecessarily amplify relative performance. I do not recall how O'neil calculates but this is what it is.

 

BTW, are you calculating it in Excel?

 

Hello DorD

 

I was wondering if you could provide an example using a simple calculation? I do use Excel

 

Cheers mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was wondering if you could provide an example using a simple calculation? I do use Excel

 

"Say you want to compare RS for last 30 days. (Simply) calculate % change of stocks in last 30 day . With this data alone you can rank stocks by their relative performance. For a more 'visual' RS score, subtract that by % change of base index in last 30 days.

 

I prefer subtraction to division because division tends to unnecessarily amplify relative performance."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stock with the best performance is relatively strongest; the stock with 5th best performance has RS rank of 5 and so on icon7.gif

 

To plot RS as an indicator, most software use the formula= Stock_Price/Base_Index_Price *100

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.