Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

nakachalet

What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....?

Recommended Posts

Specifically, if a trader pulled the trigger 30+ times in the opening hour....

 

would or could it be considered in your learned experiences as excessive and/or lunatic and/or moronic and/or suicidal.... and/or all the above combined together....?

 

here is the doc from his trade this morning on tuesday, august 30, 2011, USA east coast time zone....

 

what do you think traders....? :crap:

 

just how excessive is excessive in your experiences? :angry:

 

:haha: :haha:

5aa7109fb8546_anexampleofexcessivetrading110830tues.thumb.png.f37bbcf238ae6bcbbe5ab608d63b4b2b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Specifically, if a trader pulled the trigger 30+ times in the opening hour....

 

would or could it be considered in your learned experiences as excessive and/or lunatic and/or moronic and/or suicidal.... and/or all the above combined together....?

 

here is the doc from his trade this morning on tuesday, august 30, 2011, USA east coast time zone....

 

what do you think traders....?

 

just how excessive is excessive in your experiences? :

 

:

 

any trade that makes more than the commission,

and with the profit more than the drawdown,

is a good trade.

 

No good trades are excessive.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Tams on this one. At one point I would have said that's crazy, but in the end, all that matters is whether $$$ came into your account or left. How a trader does it is up to them. If the trades make $$$ when it counts (real-time) that's all that matters. We've all seen plenty of these wonderful looking backtests, but it's gotta count when real money is on the line.

 

Obviously if trading a lot you'd want to get your commissions down as much as possible - through your broker and looking at leasing/buying a seat as well.

 

But even a $5 round trip charge on the ES is covered by making ONE tick. One ES tick = $12.50 so as long as your win/loss ratio works, you could make money going for 1 tick on the ES even at retail commissions. I don't recommend that, but the numbers could work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the floor, we tried to hold our costs to less than 25% of profits. That's still my "rule of thimb" for a very active trader. Remember, its you taking the risk, not the broker.

 

Having said that, increasing the average trade profit is the road to better earnings.

 

I'm with Tams on this one. At one point I would have said that's crazy, but in the end, all that matters is whether $$$ came into your account or left. How a trader does it is up to them. If the trades make $$$ when it counts (real-time) that's all that matters. We've all seen plenty of these wonderful looking backtests, but it's gotta count when real money is on the line.

 

Obviously if trading a lot you'd want to get your commissions down as much as possible - through your broker and looking at leasing/buying a seat as well.

 

But even a $5 round trip charge on the ES is covered by making ONE tick. One ES tick = $12.50 so as long as your win/loss ratio works, you could make money going for 1 tick on the ES even at retail commissions. I don't recommend that, but the numbers could work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with all of the above.

if there is profit in it then great, if its mad punting with no really strategy then its going to make the broker rich.

 

Now times have changed, but about 6-7 years ago just as high frequency trading was getting going, and option market volumes were picking up, one of the major clearing brokers let us in on a few numbers of their average clients.... They estimated that for every $1 made by the market making firms, about 45 cents went in costs to clearing firms, exchanges and brokers. this was the average, (and also did not necessarily mean the firms made money - but lets assume they did as a basic rule as they were market makers with the theoretical option pricing as their edge, based on what the guy told us). We at the time averaged about 20c cost for every $1 profit - I never wanted to be too high turnover.

So for high turn over market making firms thats what they were doing then....if you are worse than this with no edge it might be worth thinking again :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very simple...if these are trades that are not valid trade signals from your trading plan, it's overtrading (excessive). Therefore, it's never the number of trades you take. Thus, if you took 300 trades in the opening hour and all were valid trade signals...it's not overtrading (excessive). Just the same, if you only had 3 valid trade signals and you took 4 trades...that's overtrading (excessive). Yet, on the flip side, if you had 3 valid trade signals and you only traded 2 of those 3 valid trade signals, that's undertrading (not trading all trade signals while actively trading). Undertrading can be just as damaging as overtrading. For example, the missed trades could be the ones that would have made you profitable for the day.

 

With that said, there's a trader psychology issue. If you mentally can't handle taking any number of trades (e.g. 3, 5, 15, 50, 100 or whatever) regardless if they are valid trade signals or not...that too is overtrading (excessive). Simply, if you feel burnt out, blood pressure shot through the roof, emotionally ruined after a trading day regardless to the number of trades taken, that too is overtrading (excessive) and you really do need to quickly learn to control that to prevent having a short-lived trading career.

 

Specifically, if a trader pulled the trigger 30+ times in the opening hour....

 

would or could it be considered in your learned experiences as excessive and/or lunatic and/or moronic and/or suicidal.... and/or all the above combined together....?

 

here is the doc from his trade this morning on tuesday, august 30, 2011, USA east coast time zone....

 

what do you think traders....? :crap:

 

just how excessive is excessive in your experiences? :angry:

 

:haha: :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OP,

Depends on that individual trader's true nature...

Equivalent question would be something like

"is that bird flying too often?"

 

zdo

 

ps great post, wrbtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OP,

Depends on that individual trader's true nature...

Equivalent question would be something like

"is that bird flying too often?"

 

zdo

 

ps great post, wrbtrader

 

if that bird got shot down, yes. :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's very simple...if these are trades that are not valid trade signals from your trading plan, it's overtrading (excessive). Therefore, it's never the number of trades you take. Thus, if you took 300 trades in the opening hour and all were valid trade signals...it's not overtrading (excessive). Just the same, if you only had 3 valid trade signals and you took 4 trades...that's overtrading (excessive). Yet, on the flip side, if you had 3 valid trade signals and you only traded 2 of those 3 valid trade signals, that's undertrading (not trading all trade signals while actively trading). Undertrading can be just as damaging as overtrading. For example, the missed trades could be the ones that would have made you profitable for the day.

 

With that said, there's a trader psychology issue. If you mentally can't handle taking any number of trades (e.g. 3, 5, 15, 50, 100 or whatever) regardless if they are valid trade signals or not...that too is overtrading (excessive). Simply, if you feel burnt out, blood pressure shot through the roof, emotionally ruined after a trading day regardless to the number of trades taken, that too is overtrading (excessive) and you really do need to quickly learn to control that to prevent having a short-lived trading career.

---------------------

PaperClip nakachalet What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 09:13 AM

Tams Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 09:36 AM

brownsfan019 Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 11:28 AM

electroniclocal Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 12:50 PM

SIUYA Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 03:40 PM

wrbtrader Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 06:22 PM

zdo Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 07:58 PM

Tams Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 08:10 PM

zdo Re: What Would Experienced Traders Consider As EXCESSIVE TRADING....? Yesterday, 09:32 PM

-------------------

I WOULD BE DELIGHTED TO LEARN FROM ALL OF YOU, GREAT TRADERS INDEED....

 

may i pay homage and tribute to all you great traders.... 3 cheers for you all.... :applaud: :applaud: :applaud:

 

and here is the rest of the pix which was left out from the original....

 

:haha: i truly admire all your insights and experiences.... may your trading days be overflowed with absurd profitability, joy, pleasure and happiness....

 

it is a little scary, when the green low 4-digit appears at the end of the first hour!

 

thx a mil y'al for taking your time, much appreciated and very much humbled by all your responses as well.

5aa7109fe6f0e_EXCESSIVETRADINGORNOT....30TRADESINANHOUR.png.eef6db2a824d6b7582f6daebce9c3e6b.png

Edited by nakachalet
it is a little scary, when you noticed the green 4-digit at the end of the first hour!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 trades is a lot if he was only supposed to take 20. It's not enough if he was supposed to take 40. If he was supposed to take the 30 trades, then he is awesome.

 

If he was not in his right mind, then even 1 was too many.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is also the issue of opportunity costs to your personal time. If an extra 2 hours of trading gets me an extra 50 dollars of profit after commissions, I might want to just go do something else with my time. In other words, I had the opportunity to do something else with that 2 hours, and I instead used it to trade, and only made an extra 50 dollars. I gained 50 dollars, but there was a cost to gaining that 50 dollars in time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The term excessive trading makes no sense what so ever.. .

 

Key factor in increasing profits in a positive expectancy game is to increase frequency of occurrence.. See how professional online poker players seek to maximize there edge by playing multiple simultaneous games, some of the best up to 20 - 25 games at a time..

 

Anyone who tells you, you are losing money because you are trading to much does not know what they are talking about, you are losing money because you have a crap system... in that instance trading less will only slow down your DD...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plan your trade(s) and Trade your plan. If u r trying to guess the direction of the IB (initial balance/first hour of trading, clicking away could be a sign of you don't know what u r doing. Do you have an addictive personality? I have found that if I have an idea and trade that idea, scalping the market in the direction of my idea helps me to book the profits. I traded today 3 instruments, never trading more than 3 contracts on each instrument at a time. At the end of the day I had 53 turns/$7338 gross. That's how I like to do it. And my trading was done before the "open" of the NYSE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plan your trade(s) and Trade your plan. If u r trying to guess the direction of the IB (initial balance/first hour of trading, clicking away could be a sign of you don't know what u r doing. Do you have an addictive personality? I have found that if I have an idea and trade that idea, scalping the market in the direction of my idea helps me to book the profits. I traded today 3 instruments, never trading more than 3 contracts on each instrument at a time. At the end of the day I had 53 turns/$7338 gross. That's how I like to do it. And my trading was done before the "open" of the NYSE.

 

ohmshontee

 

my utmost admiration and esteem for you and for anyone who have such unequalled will and determination and self control which most traders lack.... on the way to consistent profitability in their trading career.

 

3 cheers to you too. :missy:

 

shabbat shalom to you and everyone :applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have found that if I have an idea and trade that idea, scalping the market in the direction of my idea helps me to book the profits.

 

I have the same style. I'm always looking to lock in profits at good opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone who tells you, you are losing money because you are trading to much does not know what they are talking about, you are losing money because you have a crap system... in that instance trading less will only slow down your DD...

 

For a completely mechanical "system," this is true. But when discretion comes into play, as it does for almost all traders, the lines between what is a "good" signal and forcing things becomes unclear. For example, when the mind enters the picture after a few losses, wanting to get the money back, one can easily be tempted to interpret what he sees as a good potential trade, even if it's not. This can lead to overtrading.

 

The type of "system" you are talking about sounds like the ones you buy for $395. If this is your trading experience, your above logic would make sense to you--but unfortunately does not work in the long term in the real world, and you are in for some eye opening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would define "overtrading" as taking trades that are not well planned.

 

Doing this may yield profits sometimes, but in the long run I think it's bad because it demonstrates a lack of discipline, which is never rewarded in the market. It's kind of like lying--you can do it a few times and not get caught, but that can only encourage you to lie more, and soon enough a liar WILL get caught, probably in a much bigger lie than he ever dreamed he'd tell, and things will come crashing down.

 

Undertrading is not good, but it's not as bad as overtrading. You cannot lose money by not taking trades. This is a far better place to be in than being in trades you shouldn't be in, and actually losing money because of bad decisions. Sure, undertrading costs you potential money, and I think it's detrimental to the profit, but at least you walk away with your account still intact. The danger here would be compensating by then forcing trades which are not well planned because of fear of continuing to miss out--but again, this would be overtrading, resulting from undertrading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, I keep having this exact same problem.

 

On Friday I made 3000 euros in one trade in like 2 hours but then at the end of the day I lost pretty much all of it in 3 trades in the same amount of time near the end of the session.

 

Sometimes you just need to know when to quit when you're ahead.

 

The biggest issue I have is not being able to cope with 'mistakes'. I use ' ' tags because sometimes what you perceive as mistakes aren't actually mistakes; they're just a part of doing business. Variance if you will.

 

This problem of overtrading usually strikes when I think I have made a 'mistake' or just made some bad trades.

 

Basically it's a state of mind that you need to be able to recognise and prevent, or subdue it when it appears.

 

It's pretty hard though, any advice?

 

The only thing I can think of is to try to try not to think about the money too much, and physically distancing myself from my trading platform by shutting it down, or the whole computer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would define "overtrading" as taking trades that are not well planned.

 

 

Taking trades that are not part of a well defined plan already has a term, it's called GAMBLING.. if you are not able to identify your set ups like the back of your hand, you have no business trading..

 

"Overtrading" implies trading to often, likely coined by Trading Instructors and the like.. put simply there is no such thing as trading to much.. your use of the term only serves to confuse new traders but each to his own..

 

With regards to a mechanical system I don't quite understand the point you are trying to make.. a system that provides positive expectancy or an edge over a large number of trades is simply that, a system with an edge.. increasing the frequency of occurrence of this type of system by operating multiple systems or the same system on multiple uncorrelated markets will increase cumulative profits, whether it is completely mechanical/discretionary or a mix of the two has no bearing on the concept.

 

Undertrading is not good, but it's not as bad as overtrading.

 

Sigh... :crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Man, I keep having this exact same problem.

 

On Friday I made 3000 euros in one trade in like 2 hours but then at the end of the day I lost pretty much all of it in 3 trades in the same amount of time near the end of the session.

 

Sometimes you just need to know when to quit when you're ahead.

 

The biggest issue I have is not being able to cope with 'mistakes'. I use ' ' tags because sometimes what you perceive as mistakes aren't actually mistakes; they're just a part of doing business. Variance if you will.

 

This problem of overtrading usually strikes when I think I have made a 'mistake' or just made some bad trades.

 

Basically it's a state of mind that you need to be able to recognise and prevent, or subdue it when it appears.

 

It's pretty hard though, any advice?

 

The only thing I can think of is to try to try not to think about the money too much, and physically distancing myself from my trading platform by shutting it down, or the whole computer.

 

Dear method

I dont believe there is such a thing as over trading.

 

If the market is running your way, why stop?

 

Friday was the release of the Non Farm Payroll Report.............. USA

All world markets fell , big time

 

Were you long or short?

 

If you were long,you lost your $3000

This means you trade on technicals . You ignore the fundamentals.

Good luck

bobc

 

PS I wish you good will in the Rugby World Cup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With regards to a mechanical system I don't quite understand the point you are trying to make.. a system that provides positive expectancy or an edge over a large number of trades is simply that, a system with an edge.. increasing the frequency of occurrence of this type of system by operating multiple systems or the same system on multiple uncorrelated markets will increase cumulative profits, whether it is completely mechanical/discretionary or a mix of the two has no bearing on the concept.

 

Do you actually trade, or did you just read this from a book? I'm not trying to be facetious, I'm honestly asking. If you do, can you give an example of the type of "system" you are currently trading, and how long you have been trading it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear method

* * *

Friday was the release of the Non Farm Payroll Report.............. USA

All world markets fell , big time

 

Were you long or short?

 

If you were long,you lost your $3000

This means you trade on technicals . You ignore the fundamentals.

* * *

 

What were the technicals that called for being long going into the report?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you actually trade, or did you just read this from a book? I'm not trying to be facetious, I'm honestly asking. If you do, can you give an example of the type of "system" you are currently trading, and how long you have been trading it?

 

I have racked up my 10 000 hours yes.. the first 2000 sifting through allot of this "overtrading" type garbage.

 

I rarely bother with boards but once in a while I get bored and do and then wish I hadn't bothered..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.