Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

It's not a matter of greed but of planning. If one doesn't know ahead of time what he's going to do, then whatever decision he makes in real time is essentially a gamble.

 

The hindsight postings are fine for what they are, but they are only marginally related to RT trading. Even if you guys are only paper-trading, you need to conduct yourselves as though you were trading for real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not a matter of greed but of planning. If one doesn't know ahead of time what he's going to do, then whatever decision he makes in real time is essentially a gamble.

 

The hindsight postings are fine for what they are, but they are only marginally related to RT trading. Even if you guys are only paper-trading, you need to conduct yourselves as though you were trading for real.

 

Well I can't speak for FW, but i'm trading , not much mind you , just one trade a day when I am confident in s/r , otherwise one doesn't hear a peep out of me . :)

erie

Edited by erierambler
forgot a word

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One thing I learned is you take the hand you're dealt, greed gets you in trouble. :)

erie

 

Actually, the majority of my trades seem to mirror a "lack of greed", if you want to put it that way. I'm still adjusting and tweaking my strategy as I go along, but today for instance I had sufficient reason to take some off at 1342. Resistance for me was - like you in the chart you posted - around 1349.

 

Holding on for 4 hours might not be 'difficult' strategywise, but it requires a patient mindset, something that I lack from time to time... (but I'll stop now too, as this stuff is more appropriate for my blog).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am, no surprise, a proponent of blogs. They play an important part in one's development. But only a part. If either or both of you want to take this to the next level, I suggest you take advantage of the chat room facilities here. Doing so will enable you to maintain the discipline required to follow price as it moves from S to R and back again and focus on how it behaves as it approaches each. You won't then be relying on what "feels right" or "seems best". Posting to the boards can wait until the end of the day, or until you've wrapped it up for the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I can't speak for FW, but i'm trading , not much mind you , just one trade a day when I am confident in s/r , otherwise one doesn't hear a peep out of me . :)

erie

 

One trade a day is too much pressure. If you miss the trade, then you are too likely to be thinking of the trade you missed rather than focusing on what price is doing. And if you make only one trade a day, there won't be any need for you to focus on what price is doing if you miss the trade because you consider yourself done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One trade a day is too much pressure. If you miss the trade, then you are too likely to be thinking of the trade you missed rather than focusing on what price is doing. And if you make only one trade a day, there won't be any need for you to focus on what price is doing if you miss the trade because you consider yourself done.

 

 

Not sure what you mean. I have no pressure at all. When I post s/r for the day,(on the daily) when price hits one of these and the set up is confirmed, I take it.(it's a high probability trade ) I don't trade the rest of the day because after that trade I haven't the confidence of what I see yet.( and I'm not going to give any back) If I don't post s/r (daily)it's because I'm not sure of it so I don't trade at all, just watch and try to learn more. If by chance I do miss it , it doesn't bother me, for I'm in no hurry to get anywhere. MF Global doesn't care if I trade or not and I don't need the income right now ( but that could change :) )

I like the preparation , so I'm ready , but after the trade I'm not ready , if that makes any sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure what you mean. I have no pressure at all. When I post s/r for the day,(on the daily) when price hits one of these and the set up is confirmed, I take it.(it's a high probability trade )

 

So you took the trade at 44 +/-?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One trade a day is too much pressure. If you miss the trade, then you are too likely to be thinking of the trade you missed rather than focusing on what price is doing. And if you make only one trade a day, there won't be any need for you to focus on what price is doing if you miss the trade because you consider yourself done.

 

I understand erie's point of view, and to be honest I think forcing yourself to take more trades than necessary is putting pressure on yourself. I prefer to take only one or two trades per day, per instrument. If my first trade is a profitable one, I prefer to squeeze out as much as possible out of that instead of looking for another entry. Trade management is more relaxing than concentrating on getting the entry right. I've spent too much time in the past looking to find trades all day when most of them are not worth the risk. But again, it's personal and it's not because one considers himself 'done' that he can't observe price from a neutral point of view. Observing price without thinking of an entry has helped me a lot, so after I'm done I still like to do that to acquire a better understanding.

 

I am, no surprise, a proponent of blogs. They play an important part in one's development. But only a part. If either or both of you want to take this to the next level, I suggest you take advantage of the chat room facilities here. Doing so will enable you to maintain the discipline required to follow price as it moves from S to R and back again and focus on how it behaves as it approaches each. You won't then be relying on what "feels right" or "seems best". Posting to the boards can wait until the end of the day, or until you've wrapped it up for the day.

 

Not sure what you mean by "the next level". I've been in some chatrooms and Skype trading rooms, but most of the time I found them to divert my concentration from what I should be looking at. I've also been in the one here several times and -from what I've seen- Jwhite is doing a very nice, and interesting job in analyzing price behaviour real time. But at the same time it can be distracting if you're seeing or looking at something else and you are focusing on your chart or your instrument while the other guys are talking about something which is (or can be) totally unrelated to what you're doing... I might give the chatroom another shot, the lock-ups I was experiencing might have been resolved by now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand erie's point of view, and to be honest I think forcing yourself to take more trades than necessary is putting pressure on yourself. I prefer to take only one or two trades per day, per instrument. If my first trade is a profitable one, I prefer to squeeze out as much as possible out of that instead of looking for another entry. Trade management is more relaxing than concentrating on getting the entry right. I've spent too much time in the past looking to find trades all day when most of them are not worth the risk. But again, it's personal and it's not because one considers himself 'done' that he can't observe price from a neutral point of view. Observing price without thinking of an entry has helped me a lot, so after I'm done I still like to do that to acquire a better understanding.

 

I wish you wouldn't put words in my mouth, FW. I never said that one should take more trades than necessary. Nor did I say that one should spend all day "looking to find trades". And as for getting the entry right, if one doesn't do so, then there won't be a trade to manage.

 

There were five good shorts off resistance in the ES yesterday, none of which apparently were taken. Trading partners can help one see these if for some reason he doesn't see them himself. If one chooses to go it alone, that's fine. But hindsight charts can take one only so far, and RT trading can't be learned by following message boards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean by "the next level". I've been in some chatrooms and Skype trading rooms, but most of the time I found them to divert my concentration from what I should be looking at. I've also been in the one here several times and -from what I've seen- Jwhite is doing a very nice, and interesting job in analyzing price behaviour real time. But at the same time it can be distracting if you're seeing or looking at something else and you are focusing on your chart or your instrument while the other guys are talking about something which is (or can be) totally unrelated to what you're doing... I might give the chatroom another shot, the lock-ups I was experiencing might have been resolved by now.

 

The experience is generally more beneficial if one invites like-minded traders to join him in either an existing room or a new one. Thus everyone has more or less the same focus. This beats here are all the signals you should have seen and all the trades you could have taken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The following chart was posted last Sunday:

 

7107d1213623254-dbs-cajas-famosas-image2e.gif

 

Let's see how it all worked out (same chart but drawn with Sierra):

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7156&stc=1&d=1214067990

 

Monday and Tuesday, price tested R ©. Thursday it bounced off the midpoint of the lower trading range (D) and tested R © again. Friday it dropped to S (E).

 

The advantage being, again, that all of this can be plotted in advance, saving one from having to peer fixedly at his screen for however long looking for a particular type of bar.

 

For the coming week, the setup's the same, keeping in mind that the interface between the two ranges, at 1960, may take on added importance.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on how it is going with the du Plessis log charts. Here is my latest look at PENN. (can't look back far enough intraday with stockcharts using User Defined).

 

On the line chart, the region is extended to the left in the 52ish area. The stop-look-see from the new area is calculated at 25 for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How long does S/R last? If S/R are representative levels from the past where important action took place, so that traders act again on those levels at a later time, how far back does the memory of traders go?

 

First a 4 hour chart from the DOW from about two years ago.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7214&stc=1&d=1214855378

 

Next, a 15-min chart of the last two days of the DOW e-mini:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7212&stc=1&d=1214855352

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FW,

Traders make up the market, and those who trade on longer time frame obviously watch and monitor these levels. If you have learnt to identify these levels and observe price reactions at these prices, then surely that should enhance your trading, as to how long the influence will last into the future, well that I doubt if anybody can provide a definitive answer.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am a novice to Wyckoff and am trying to learn and apply his principles.

 

Often I have trouble telling a retracement from a reversal and I want to post a chart of the Euro from today to illustrate my problem.

 

I'm posting the one minute chart and also the five minute chart for context. Around 12:20 price started breaking out of resistance with great volume and pace. Around 12:23 the price and volume action was indicating (to me) a potential buying climax (the volume peaked). Another clue was that price stopped at a well established resistance from earlier in the day and from last week. Then it began retracing and after a few bars the first up bar came about with what seemed to me like good buying pressure (for one, the volume was higher than the prior down bars). However price turned around and started going lower and you can see what happened. But it never went back up to test the high that was just made, and instead just kept going slowly lower. There was even a large volume bar around 13:00 in which the price went higher which I thought could be the buying pressure coming back in but then price kind of died out and started grinding lower and lower.

 

I'm just wondering, were there any clues that that there was not going to be a complete retracement and that price is instead reversing? Or am I just thinking too deeply into it and should just accept that the trade didn't work?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you,

CowsEatHay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just for further context, I'm also posting another chart of the euro of a much larger timeframe for a bigger picture view.

 

Thanks,

CowsEatHay

 

You have already drawn trendlines on the 1min chart, if you were long, your exit would be either the break of TL or break of previous swing low, refer to Dbphoenix forum and blog for further info. on how to apply Wyckoff principles in this regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.