chop51

Here's a quick and dirty one I threw together per Hull's original formula. MC compiled it fine. Watch your step with things like this, as it's really just a bandpass filter that's been scaled back up to price. These type of filters work great as long as you're in the middle of the passband, but as soon as you stray to one side you get some pretty vicious phase shifting going on. I don't care for the input of this indicator, as it takes the low cutoff as input and calcs the high cutoff from that. Doesn't tell you anything about where the passband center is unless you calc it by hand yourself. (e.g ~11 for this default input of Len 15). Might be better to choose an arbitrary low cutoff, input your desired passband center, and calc the high cutoff from there. Inputs: Price(MedianPrice), Len(15); Vars: FastLen(0), FastMA(0), SlowMA(0), SmoothLen(0), filter(0); FastLen=Round((Len/2),0); SmoothLen=Round(SquareRoot(Len),0); FastMA=2*WAverage(Price,FastLen); // 2* scales oscillator back to price SlowMA=WAverage(Price,Len); filter=WAverage(FastMA-SlowMA,SmoothLen); Plot1(filter,"avg");

The code posted above is making a function call to a function you don't have on your machine. I didn't check the .eld posted earlier in this thread, but the code wasn't too hard to find. http://trader.online.pl/ELZ/t-i-Hull_Moving_Average.html I didn't try to compile it, but it looks pretty simple. Should be easy enough to pop a quick function out of it. Edit: Duh, I just looked at it again. It already is a function. Correct name and everything.

If {yourMA1} > {yourMA2} then PlotPB(H,L,O,C,"Long",Blue) else PlotPB(H,L,O,C,"Short",Red); This eats up Plot1-4, so if you want to plot the MAs from the same indicator code you'll have to start with Plot5({yourMA},"MA"); I haven't used TS in ages, but back in the day it would only allow 4 plots per indicator. I'm assuming they've gotten beyond this by now.

Your Type is INTJ Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging Strength of the preferences % 89 50 62 44 I've taken this test a few times before.. even had an FBI agent friend of mine administer the official G-man version of it once. It always comes up the same; INTJ. At Thanksgiving Mom was doing her annual boohooing about not having any grandkids. I told her it was her own fault for raising 3 of 4 kids to be INTJs. What are the odds of that? From your link:

I've spent quite a bit of time messing with bands, so at first glance this looked pretty interesting. Just for laughs I went ahead and did a quick and dirty plot to the price panel. Doesn't look so hot there, but it does make me scratch my chin a bit about the possibilities that this kind of "back handed" smoothing (i.e. plotting price over normalized bands, rather than the standard way.) may hold.

Seems they show you 2 setups in one. Too bad they neglected to point out the second. Between failure to point out what appears to be a loser right on their opening image and "Like an ATM!" on there as well, I wouldn't waste any time fretting over what their "proprietary" MA/MACD parameters are.