eralinks

Hi Ingot54, Tks a Million for yr very detailed answer, really appreciative n grateful. Also tks yr adv abt the divergence of MACD with Price Action, will try n see if I can finally apply Divergence successfully, never did hit it off in the past. Tks again Ingot, n God Bless u with greater success.

Hi Ingots54, Hv been using yr given 4-21-1-5 settings MACD, at first glance seems very similar to Joedinapoli's DEMA MACD (SETTINGS OF 8-17-9) but since using it for a while now, must say yr MACD is much more appropriate use, espescially if used on Exits. Hopefully u wud be patient with my stupidity, but cud u adv what is the breakdown of the 4-21-1-5 setting (as compared to the conventional 12-26-9 MACD), FOR EXAMPLE, is 4 the fast-21 the slow, but then what is the 1 n 5 settings? Hope to get yr adv with many grateful tks.

Hi Ingot 54, Tks for the MACD attchmt indi for the 4 figures settings, looks very interesting. The Spuds Rope stochs looks colorful, will need time to understand it better. Tks again.

Hi Ingot54, Am confused by yr MACD settings of 4/21/1.5, I dont seem to be able to set the 1.5 on my MT4 platform, is the setting of 1.5 correct or should it read as 4/21/5? Hope for yr adv, tks.

Hi Berzerk, Must say it's a very well expressed post, like it. Yr comments of going ahead if the right signals/patterns appear n accepting loss as part of the bness is definitely true, as long as one is confident of whatever methodology/system that is applied. Having said all that, it has been unfortunate that my past experience of breakout trades hv encountered more fakes resulting in losses more than gains, while other tests on different breakout methods that hv more filters, etc hv resulted in much smaller gains n very much lesser trading opportunities. Yr post indicates u do hv good success rates with breakouts so was wondering if u cud adv the breakout methods u apply n ratio of successful breakouts compared to fakes. Hoping for yr adv/comments, tks.

Hi Ingot54, I am a quiet reader, simply bcos I dont hv better ideas to contribute but I'll say I'm following yr thread with great interest n concentration. It does seem to me that this strategy of yrs can hv potentials to be a method of long term consistency, perhaps only a gut feel now, bcos, as u said, this thread has not progressed to a "Nailed It" stage yet. IMHO, based on my experiences in following forums/threads, oftentimes not all parts of a strategy will be 'IT" but very frequently certain application portions of the strategy can be the "AHA" moment, espescially if a reader has past experience n hv their own systems in use n this "AHA" info/tip/suggestion becomes an invaluable enhancemt to their own systems/methods. The reason I'm writing this message is bcos I'm very concerned that u may gv up on tis thread, n really sincerely hope u will continue. In fact, I check my inbox in anticipation of yr new posts n will really miss it if it's no longer available. Again hopefully u wud continue n u definitely can count me in as a faithful follower. Kind rgds.