Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
wilddog
-
Content Count
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by wilddog
-
I found it. Thank you very much. I see what you mean it has the whole kit and kaboodle.
-
The good thing about Spyder is he is a man of few words and speaks in riddles. On the other hand Jack is a man of many words and waffles. No disrespect to either.
-
Thanks for the above drill.
-
No need to bow out. Well said. The goal is to make money. There are people out there using parts of this method that are successful. Good luck
-
SK0 please could you post your annotated chart on this forum. Thanks
-
Please do not attack other members on this forum. I have read this thread a number of times and the amount of charts Spyder posted fully annotated with explanations on TL, is exactly ZERO. Secondly other people may not be at the same level as you, so things that are not helpful to you may be helpful to others. This is a public forum and treat it as such.
-
Found it "All inside formations have the same rules. The first bar is always processed. the second or sunsequence bar(s) is NOT processed if smaller in volume than the first. If NOT, then it is processed. For out side bars, they count as two bars in a trends sequence. THe first value is done as usual. The second value is simple: it is the NEXT value in the trend sequence." Forums - The bottom
-
I dont remember who posted it, it was how Jack treats 2 bar (It is in this thread) If the second bar of an internal has increasing volume you treat them as separate bars.
-
Spyder made it very clear there is only ONE way to interpret the market. It is fantastic people are posting their charts and their interpretations. Keep it up. What I am trying to say is be very careful what you take from other charts besides Spyders. I have been down that rabbit hole and wasted a lot of time learning wrong principles. HTH
-
I suggest you look at some of spyders charts. It looks like a different fractal
-
Thanks, I don't read Jacks writings. Too difficult to understand. Spyder never had VE zones. He would use the previous pt3 as a new pt1 and would create a faster container. Trading FTT to FTT would not be possible with VE zones, since there are no FTT's only VE's
-
cnms2, what is a VE zone? Thanks
-
I found it, it was by Nkhoi http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachments/34/22529d1286747524-price-volume-relationship-fractal3.png
-
I think you are overlooking the basics. The 1 is the FTT of the previous up move. A R2R goes from a pt1 to pt2. How do you see bar 10-12 as the R2R? Corey had a chart that showed the the above. HTH
-
patrader, please could you post annotated charts Thanks
-
patrader, I have seen charts of spyder where he does use the second bar of a pennant with decreasing volume. It is not common so I am guessing there are exceptions to the rule, please could you comment on the exceptions? Thanks
-
Jack is way beyond my intellect. I find him very difficult to understand. Spyders charts are more legible and I can follow the fractals. As far as I am aware Jack trades two bar tapes.
-
Please could experienced users post their daily charts so noobies can learn. Thanks
-
Monkman I suggest you study patrader two bar case document. I think he is one of the original "A-team". Good luck
-
The more you post the better. I am sure I speak for many.
-
Please post chart. Thanks
-
On your chart; your green FTT (6th last bar of the day), is not the FTT, the 5th last bar of the day which your have labelled "STITCH" is in fact the FTT for that channel. HTH
-
Tick charts are for SCT trading, you cannot identify a FTT on a 5 minute time frame from a tick chart.
-
Where can you download the latest Spydertrader toolset/indicators for Tradenavigator? Thanks
-
Sure it is a subset, but the main reason for the YM leading the ES as an indicator of change is because the YM is a price-weighted average index and the ES is capitalization-weighted index. Now look at the weights of the YM in the ES. The answer should be clear to you. Hope this helps.
