traderslabprosper11

My experience I believe is similar to Thomas's.. I believe they make a practice fairly often of distorting or rewriting history regarding what they actually recommended, especially regarding their 'roadmaps', in order to claim they made a good call when in reality they did not. Another example- they put out numerous support/resistance levels at the beginning of the day, and if one out of 10 happens to actually work, you will see in their nightly report that the market hit their 'target' and then reversed, and what a great trade it was!! I guess the other 9 were not targets (since they didn't work!) We all can claim this kind of success if we just put out enough support/resistance levels in advance, and then only talk about the ones that were valid after the fact (or close to being valid), sort of like psychics who publish in some obscure place a list of 500 celebrities they are predicting will die in 2012, and then make a big fuss about their 'success' when by luck one does pass away in 2012.! The smaller-size daytrades that are recommended are not too bad, and are reported fairly accurately, but I don't think those are worth the high monthly subscription price.. And for me, it's really aggravating when they keep claiming wonderful success on the 'roadmap' trades that in my limited experience (admitted only 2 - 3 weeks, and I will cancel before I get billed again) are not necessarily an accurate reflection of the actual trading advice given in real time..