todds

I assume you are talking about $tick? Thank you for bringing this up! I was lamenting the fact that I couldn't get $tick with my Zen Fire data through my broker and completely forgot that I could get it with TOS. Thanks for the reminder. $tick is not an indicator in TOS. You need to open a separate chart and enter $tick the same as you would a stock or futures symbol.

The question needs refining to be more relevant to most of the members of TL. I doubt if anyone here has Buffett-like money and some of us don't have 50 years to compound. It seems to me that imbedded within the original question was the assumption that the trader's account size afforded him/her the choice of trading style. An account of $150 billion leaves but one choice. In addition, for a trader who is 60 years old, long term investing does not allow them many years left to enjoy their success. With that, how about refining the question to something like: assuming competency, who makes more money over a 5 year (or 10 year) period starting with a $50,000 account, the scalper, the swing trader, or the investor?

this is really the essence isn't it? A competent trader will make the most money by trading the smallest time frame that can accommodate their account size and time allocated to trading.

I'm not really consciously tracking every tick change, just trying get a feel for which side is more eager. Large trades can pass through the time and sales window in a fraction of a second during active periods. I believe the subconscious can pick this up. In any case, I think the speed of recording you are talking about is fine for what I want. Great information, thank you so much. Really helps!

You are correct, I am referring to playback slow motion. Will the recording speed of 12-29fps capture all of the time and sales data crossing the screen and changes on the DOM that you would see in real time? If not it wouldn't be worth doing. Thanks for your feedback.

Interesting thread. I've been getting into tape reading the time and sales window and the DOM and was looking for a screen recorder that could capture a full session (7 hours) with the capability of slow motion replay. Most important is the slow motion replay. Do any of the products mentioned do slow motion? It's not always apparent from the product descriptions.

Interesting study...and the answer is...I lose a lot more money when I don't manage.

ForexTraderX, I commend you for what you are doing and I am interested in what you have to say. I day trade some of the same instruments (CL, GC, NQ). However, I find it hard to follow your thread due to the large number of posts and sheer volume of commentary. Perhaps you would get more interaction if you posted less often, showing annotated charts that explained reasons for entry and exits (see Thalestrader's posts on Reading Charts in Real Time thread). Perhaps these could be end-of-day summaries. Forums like this do not lend themselves well to real time trading in the short term. The live chat room could be reserved for the real time commentary. Just food for thought. Again, thanks for making the effort.

My trading success improved dramatically when I decided to take profits at 2 times risk on nearly all of my trades. The only time I veer from this is if price moves with dramatic momentum in my favor. Then I will trail closely until stopped. Yes, I miss out on some good runs, but it doesn't matter. With this philosophy I can be successful only 50% of the time and end up well ahead.

I think a more interesting stat would be something like: what percentage of traders are successful who have put in at least 3-5 years of concentrated full time effort? Or, a graph that compares success rate against time spent in concentrated full time effort. In either case it doesn't mean much personally. As someone said in an earlier post, to the determined individual, stats about the masses are irrelevant. A few are going to do what it takes to make it and the rest are not.

You are correct that the people specifically introducing the legislation are the same, namely DeFazio and Harkin. But there is a growing chorus of influential individuals joining them calling for a worldwide FTT: Sarkozy of France, Merkel of Germany, and Bill Gates to name a few. Thankfully some do "get it" like Cameron of the UK and even perhaps Obama at this time (though I wonder how his feelings would change in a second term when there is no longer anything to lose). However, if the economy worsens and there is more civil unrest there will be a need for a "villain du jour" as you put it. In spite of how stupid and destructive such a tax would be, politicians are fully capable of such stupidity and destruction. It would behoove all of us, especially those participants on a trading website, to pay attention and spread the word lest the ball get rolling a bit too fast to stop.

If I am reading the bill just introduced (HR3313) correctly, and it passes, it will effectively end day trading futures and other instruments. The bill calls for a .03% tax on the underlying specified base amount for the instrument. This would mean $10,000 worth of stock would be taxed $3 in addition to current commissions and fees. What is now a $9.99 transaction will be $12.99. For ES which is currently trading at around 1250, the base amount would be 1250 X $50 per contract = $62,500. The tax would be $62,500 X .03% or $18.75 per side and $37.5 round trip. Add that to the current $5 per round trip and you get $42.50 per round trip. I am not sure how many day trading models can handle $42.50/contract in transaction costs. Peter DeFazio (D) Oregon has openly said he wants to eliminate day trading, claiming it is a useless and destructive endeavor. This would do it. I hope I am interpreting this wrong. Please someone tell me I am! In all likelihood it will not pass with a Republican House but this is the third time a bill like this has been introduced. They will keep hammering away until they get it.

Tim, I have heard this statement in various forms in trading and sports. When you or others say "mental" or "psychological" what specifically are you referring to? Are you referring to more broad definitions to include things like perseverance and determination, or is it more specific like a traders ability to follow their trading plan or a quarterback's ability to read a defense?

I have no problem with peaceful protest and many times it can be quite effective. Whatever one thinks about the Tea Party protests their effects were profound in the last election. But, there are protests for good causes and protests for not so good causes, so one has to look at what the protestors are protesting about and what they want. Funny enough, the Tea Party protests and the Wall Street Protests are kindred spirits in a way. Both know that something has gone seriously wrong with the system. However, they seem to have completely opposite remedies. The Tea Party essentially said government is too big and has too much influence, reduce it. Occupy Wall Street, though having no coherent message, seems to be made up of people who would expand the size and scope of government. So, depending on one's beliefs, one protest is for a good cause and one protest is for a not so good cause.

MMS, it will be interesting to hear your report to find out if you still believe this movement will result in real benefit after seeing it up close. I am not so optimistic. Someone got up in front of a crowd at Occupy LA, the west coast's version of Occupy Wall Street, and asked the question to the crowd: "Capitalism, thumbs up or thumbs down?" Most in the crowd responded with thumbs down. They seemed to be comprised of mostly anti-capitalists, pro-big government advocates, and various no-nothing ignoramuses. I certainly do not believe that the banks and Wall Street are angels, and targeted reasonable regulation is necessary, but I would be a little more inclined to look favorably on the protestors if they moved their operation 230 miles down the road to Washington, D.C. where the real genesis of the bubble and subsequent burst occurred.