Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

pjohnm

Members
  • Content Count

    71
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • First Name
    TradersLaboratory.com
  • Last Name
    User
  • City
    london
  • Country
    United Kingdom
  • Gender
    Male

Trading Information

  • Vendor
    No
  • Favorite Markets
    Nasdaq, S&P
  • Broker
    Capital Spreads
  1. I've found the mid points of the various waves a good indicator of where S/R may next form, so R is at 39/40 and S is at 21 and then 12. Beyond that, S could probably form anywhere below 12 to 00, given that bottom of the range has not been violated. Above 40, we have already broken the 48-50 zone last week, so I would adopt a wait and see approach. If, for example, price breaks above 40, I would look at the reaction from wherever price stalls to the mid point of that upmove and see if something interesting happens there.
  2. The immediate levels of interest for me this morning: S at 12 Trading Range at 26/31 MP of uptrend at 22 Potential R at 40 +/- but not yet tested Price is now hovering at the MP of the TR, so wait for the test of 26/31 and judge whether there is price behaviour that can be traded off. Note that buying waves on the 1 min are now getting smaller.
  3. Given that todays open presented an almost identical set-up to the previous days open, I thought this chart would be worth posting as a comparison. The placement of R and the reason for taking the short should be obvious, but the question is what to do thereafter. Having spent the past half an hour tieing myself up in knots regarding entry and stop placement, I'm just going to post the chart for future reference.
  4. The plan for today: Go long at a succesful test of 11 / 9 Short failure at 9 SAR at 2700 / 2722 if there is a reversal signal Take BO's of extremes if not already in position The opportunity to take a long at 11 came during the pre-mkt, and from there price rallied to 22 at the open, failed to follow through with a HH, reversing to 17 before attempting a test. The test was in fact a LH, and the LL presented a short entry op. (1.5 pt profit) Price instead found buyers at 14, broke the SL, returned to 20 and came to rest at the MP of the opening activity. This to me therefore, was not another short op. Re chart 2 Price appeared to make a short lived hinge, and from there, made a HH. This time, there was a follow through and a long could be taken, with an exit and the break of the dl. (2 pt loss) Price broke the dl soon after and congested between 21 and 24, the resolution of this provided another short op (exit at sl brk / breakeven). Chart 3 Buyers made another HL at 20 and the breakout from the previous congestion area provided another long op, this time at the HH following the pullback. (0-4 pts depending on where you got filled and trade mgt tactics) Worst case estimate, 4 trades, 0.5 pt net loss before charges etc
  5. Price moved from the High yesterday at 2724 to the Low at 2698 and has sinced bounced up through the MP at 2711, reversed at 21 overnight and has now tested 11 from above pre-open. The move up from yesterday's low at 2698 to the overnight high gives an MP of 2709. The extremes for today then are S at 2700 +/- and R at 22 +/- The plan for today: Go long at a succesful test of 11 / 9 Short failure at 9 SAR at 2700 / 2722 if there is a reversal signal Take BO's of extremes if not already in position
  6. My preference is to use the the 1 min for determining swing points, sl/dl's and trend, so 2615 would need to be breached to confirm reversal of the trend, which as you say is too late for entry. Entry at 10 therefore can only be considered if it is pre determined S, where I would then switch to a tick chart. The entry drill as far as I'm aware is wait for a successful test (such as a HL or DB), and enter above price. As DB says, the move to 2615 is your first indication of rejection of the trend, as previous swing points are broken on the tick (or on the 1 min, a HH after 10). You then get a HL, above which you have placed your entry, I would prefer waiting for price to to make a sequence of HH and HL's on the tick.
  7. Hi Tup, having spent some time watching tick charts, I like to see a sequence of HL's and HH's, the only problem I would have with your first green entry is that price fails to make a HH at 2613 after making a HL. As for whether you are looking at a reversal, I would want to see either the swing high at 2615 broken, or a change in behaviour like lessening momentum (sl's fanning out). The second entry would fit this criteria, but again would prefer to wait for a HH after the HL. I agree with your comment on using tick charts for entry though, I believe this is essential.
  8. My trading plan posted in the TIF thread before the open was was pretty straightforward, in summary go long on confirmation of strength above 60, ditto short below 60. My target for the longs was 88, and the chart shows the long opps following the test of 63 post open. If the ret is taken at 67 (see Nik's tick chart post) and the tactic is to wait for the first swing point post open to draw the dl, then the options are to exit at the dt and break of dl at 73, or hold until the swing low is broken at 69. (The swing low is broken twice, but only for a few seconds). A short would probably be justified had sellers held price below 69, with an initial target of 60, but this never materialised, so you can either stick to the plan, stay in the long and risk getting stopped out at breakeven, or buy the new high post the hinge breakout and retrace at 74. The rest of the chart shows the reasons for staying in the long, rather than taking trades counter to the trend. The notes taken here should help me form the basis for producing a more detailed plan.
  9. A trading plan of sorts for today. Given the successful tests of 2626 since Dec 5th, we have our important S established and if we break above 60, then there is a posiiblity of heading back up to 90. I would favour a long if we can break above 60 (preferably with a dl in place post open, or breaking out of a pre-open TR), otherwise shorts are in order around 60+/- where weakness is apparent, either at a DT or if a downtrend / sl has developed post open. Beyond that, no reason for price to reverse back to 26, but watching out for reversal type action at 50 and 40. If 60 is broken to the upside, 75 is the first target, then 88+.
  10. Given that y is a MP, I would note where it is, but then I would be looking for behaviour to confirm whether this is S/R (likewise at B and C). I would also want to know where price is on longer timeframe and make a decision that complements that. (I cant find a chart for this market). Examples would be to take a long on the short term time frame if we are at the bottom of a longer term TR, or in an uptrend, or beaking out of a TR. The main action I look for includes a db, a h&s type pattern, a congestion (pace slowing) followed by a bounce, an sl break (in the case of y being tested from above) followed by a HL. Even then, if the opening is a trend of weakness, then I would probably want more than just one of these behaviours to be apparent.
  11. The gap up from 49 to 70 an hour before the open created the potential for a quick reversal should pre open S (64) fail to hold, (given the lack of support that price created on the way up) and the cue for entry was given by the LH following the initial breach of 64. A scenario that perhaps warrants its own strategy.
  12. An interesting development pre open as price has gapped out of the downward channel that has been created since the start of the week. 78 now comes into focus as R, wheras S could be found at 61/56/52 before the level at 47 where more trades have taken place.
  13. From TIF thread: "The reaction to the downmove from Dec 3rd has stalled at halfway (2678), which is also the MP of the TR that started on Nov 29th.The PD provided S at 50/4 and the hinge at 61. The reaction from Nov 19 may be coming to an end and a brk below 50 could be important." (I should add that I saw 54 as more important S as more trades were taken there). Given the above context, it was difficult to look beyond the previous weakness continuing at the open, even though we had a DB at 58 at 9:42, it was immediately followed by a failure to test the previous high, so a break below the opening S level was a confirmation of continued weakness. (There was a retrace around 55 if one wanted to take the break below 58 as a short). 50 briefly held, but the drop in price following the contraction in the price range was not a good sign, and represented another short op. This level came into play again when following a db at 42, buyers failed to break back above it. (Note the PA referred to on the chart when price got back here) I had no real levels of S to focus on sub 50, but taking a long at the db at 42 could be justified as current day S. Again, a market breadth indicator would be useful here, and the obstacle levels fairly obvious. Given the lack of S below 50, these are the scenarios where I want to be trying to catch the longer moves. How the trader chooses to ride the wave down to 23 is up to them, but is covered in detail elsewhere.
  14. The reaction to the downmove from Dec 3rd has stalled at halfway (2678), which is also the MP of the TR that started on Nov 29th.The PD provided S at 50/4 and the hinge at 61. The reaction from Nov 19 may be coming to an end and a brk below 50 could be important. NDX 04.12.12.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.