Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
gucci
-
Content Count
211 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by gucci
-
Those "vocabulary words" influence decisions and actions resulting from them. It is kind of important. How would you describe the "nature" of a lateral which comprises the movement of price from point 2 to point 3? What decision (and appropriate action) would result from the aforementioned different description?
-
Romanus, how Point 2 to Point 3 movement can be dominant? (in a binary universe of course)
-
Lateral movement of price (in a lateral formation) comprises the left to right flow of the market (price). How can this movement be dominant? If one calls it dominant, one simply missed an FBO (SOC) in this lateral (due to an unintentional fractal jumping perhaps). I would be glad to see an example of a dominant lateral.
-
Spyder, the first passage in your response doesn't have anything to do with the quote. In your second two passages, the first one doesn't have anything to do with the quote and the second one tries to obnubilate a reprehension. The last two paragraphs simply contain some tinglers. Thank you for your time, Spyder. PS: Guys, I apologies for this "rude" answer, I won't bother you anymore with my posts. I wish all of you a lot of success.
-
Spyder, I find myself in a position, where anything I say about your last two answers can and will be interpreted as an attempt to debate something. The reasonable decision in such a situation is to abstain from it. So I will comply. Your suggestion to embark upon differentiation process is without question a conducive one. As far as I understand the nature of the above mentioned process and am able to educe its appropriate modus operandi, I would associate it with falsifying the theories in critical rationality. With your knowledgeable answers I hoped to falsify my theories about some relationships between price and volume and move on. This would be really helpful, I thought. By the way, my last question didn’t have anything to do with annotations at all (Gaussians are Gaussians, do they have anything to do with annotations?). But I guess that was my fault, because I asked it. Thank you for your time.
-
Spyder, would the information provided by the Gaussians to the right of the marked ftt in the attached chart suffice, in order to unambiguously classify "this something" as a traverse. If so, would it be dominant or non-dominant one?
-
Such may be the case. This is exactly the reason I asked to omit the Gaussians annotations but leave the ones in the Price pane on those charts. For me personally that would allow to gauge the importance of various building blocks of Gaussians.
-
Spyder, could you post a few charts with examples of tapes on them, that look like traverses (akin to the recent chart of dkm) and some charts with examles of traverses, that look like those tapes. If you omit Gaussians annotations that would be tremendously conducive for understanding of the fractal jumping. I hope I don't ask too much here, but I guess that would be really helpful.
-
Sorry for the lines at the first tape (on the atmost left part of the attachment) they are not quite parallel, but still helpful to demonstrate what I mean. I couldn't see an FTT there but IBGS?
-
Spyder, would you please take the peculiarities of this specific "tape" apart if this indeed is one? TIA.
-
Hi romanus, I do not know whether I interpreted the quoted sentence the way it was supposed to be, so bear with me. But there seems to be a tacit implication that FTT represents the ONLY POSSIBLE end effect (i.e. completion) of a sequence on any fractal?