Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
FJK
-
Content Count
42 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by FJK
-
I spoke to Kevin from Genesis today about the gap removal feature. To further "persuade" Genesis to implement it ASAP, he suggested that I wrote to this e-mail address explaining what I want implemented: support@genesisft.com I have just done so, and I appeal to you to do the same. Let's hope e-mails from paying customers are taken more into consideration than anonymous posts on a forum :helloooo:
-
A word of advice, don't look at other peoples chart in this thread (especially not mine ) to establish what is right and wrong. The market tells you. Every single day. If you look at the channel fractal for the last couple of days, you should come to a clear conclusion about your annotations are correct or not. When the market tells you that - perhaps - you are missing something. Ask yourself why. Why is the key. The key to applying it to your own trading - in realtime. For me, it is impossible to get to 'why' by looking at other peoples charts. YMMV of cause :missy: Lastly, why have you chosen not to annotate all three fractals as advised in the beginning of this thread?
-
My chart from the last two days. Pretty standard. My traverse point 2 today is the only possible solution. Ask yourself why it can't be the 1025, 1115 or 1135 bar. (and yes, you can apply the correct answer to all point 1 --> 2 movements)
-
Thanks for posting. My take on 23/10-2009. Comments welcome
-
To users of Trade Navigator: On Genesis' forum, there has been posted a note in the wish-list section about a 'gap-removal' functionality. I urge you to support this initiative by posting your opinion as well. www.Genesisft.com • View topic - Gap removal
-
Thanks for posting I've noticed that your channel gaussians differ from mine. What color annotations do you use?
-
My take on 13/10-2009. As usual, comments welcome Please keep goats out of this discussion. They are fine animals. They don't bother anyone. If I ever get to pull 50 points out of the market each day using these methods, I plan to retire as a goatherd in the Alps :missy:
-
Yeah, I also noticed some bars being below PT3 in the first part of the AM traverse (if that's what you mean). I used the binary approach for deciding what to do. I ruled out all other possibilities, leaving me with a 5 point profit on a PT3 entry Gab-removal would be a very nice feature in TN.
-
My take on 8/10-2009. Comments welcome
-
My take on 5/10-2009 I didn't trade the somewhat 'messy' AM session. Comments welcome
-
If you started annotating all 3 gaussian fractals as has been recommended numerous times, perhaps you'll find the answers that you're looking for. There is only one correct way to annotate a chart. Not two, but one. The market will tell you which. Good luck
-
My take on 2/10-2009 Comments welcome
-
Thanks Yup, I nailed 8 points in the AM session (entered on bar 3). I ended early, nice way to start the weekend Your chart looked similar to mine, so I guess you entered long as well?
-
My take on 1/10-2009
-
My take. Mine is different from ehorns and romanus'. Regarding the differences, Spyder, have you changed something about the coloring functions in Trade Navigator since your PVTools? - my 1330 & 1335 bars are colored differently than yours. I assume we both use Genesis' datafeed.. If my non-dominant tape from the above period is wrongly annotated, I miss R2R2B2R in my pink lateral, hence it is invalid.
-
Regarding laterals; If we take Spyders recommendation for grouping laterals in two groups into consideration, one could for example label them: - change and continuation or - dominant and non-dominant If one choose the latter, how do we define dominant and non-dominant movement? Is it, like jbarnby mentioned in post#265 "moving in the dominant direction on the forming bar" or do we define it as the forming bar has to be a dominent bar before the lateral can be defined as dominant? If we take contexts into consideration, one also has to define which fractal that is to be analyzed. This is especially important if one choose to label them dominant and non-dominant. I think it would be wise to start "simple" with what is known to be fact without any doubt. There are two "groups" according to Spyder, and we all know that context (i.e. where we are in the sequences) is a dealbraker. Then take it from there.
-
This is an example of a trade using Spydertraders "multi-fractal" sequences. It is from today (I covered at 1551 EST). Notice that a faster up-trend has to complete before the slower down trend can continue. I covered with 2pts. profit due to the time of day which can be - as you all know - rather noisy. My reason for covering has nothing to do with what Spydertrader has posted earlier.