Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.
Flex1975
-
Content Count
20 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Although backtesting is just a single step and only valuable when confirmed by forward testing... it is a crucial step in the whole proces. Calling a backtest a lie confirms indeed Phantom is not a daytrader with 12 years of experience... I do not apologize for my skeptical posts in this thread but based on the replies I realize the harder I try to prove Phantom is a fake the more forum members luv him... If people choose to believe him and eventually buy his/her stuff (or worse...give him/her your trading money to do the trading for you) then I have to respect that and keep my ethical mouth shut... The bait is always too attractive for people blinded by $ signs. That's how it works and always will work....
-
You got me...as you can judge from my number of posts I am just a forum junkie.... Just read the post of Peterthemonkey...he explains it perfectly...
-
Dude...you've positioned yourself as the greatest trader alive... Fine with me...back it up... The thread is yours...everybody listens....
-
And there are the big (hype) words again... prove/backup your words and you get all the credits/respect you demand....also from me...one of the biggest "sociopaths"...!! It's up to you....I promise to keep my mouth shut...
-
I promise nothing...but I know I have a few (very) old BB squeeze strategies somewhere on a prehistoric computer. I'll run a few verification tests and try to add some rules to show what MightyMouse means with getting better served if you follow price action...
-
You already answered my previous post...my apologies. You don't have to automate your setups but coding your setups as an alert or indicator to highlight the appearances in your historical data is crucial. That way you can develop better ways to filter the best trades... Just a tip...
-
True!!! Phantom, have you ever backtested your setups based on a continuous dataset of say 24 to 36 months? You use NinjaTrader so you have the right software....
-
You're always free to crack my thinking... The way I see the markets is far from perfect so I never have a problem when someone tells me my brain needs an upgrade... But what you wrote is very good because you made a rule... A narrow (inverted) hammer bar at/above the upper BB band is a 'mini sideways channel'. Ok, next step... define the rejection rules to trigger permission to enter the market and attach an entry value. As said before...I am not pissing off the setup...but it only has a shot when the frame of the setup has been clearly defined.
-
Ok, now you even lost me... Calsprdr is right...there is no consolidation pattern on the 120 min...the 2 bars at the peak have a higher low and higher high so I am curious what your definition of an uptrend is. Attached charts of the 15 min and 20 min with two consolidation boxes which are based on specific consolidation rules. These rules are not your rules so if people on this forum wants to use your setup in live trading when are they entering the trade? The first breakout down on the 15 min/20 min? The second? The third? The second down bar on the 120 min? You say you look for an "volatility" bar...it's clear what you mean by that but when you take your example 2 the "volatility" bar (third bar down) closes far below the upper Bollinger band while you said that you "take" the trade coming from the band values. My point is...I assume you're already in the trade when the "volatility" bar closes. Not? I only ask these questions to code a quick strategy to show people the results of your setup based on an extended period of time (2/3 years) instead of a few handpicked "big move" examples. Consistency is all what counts... Maybe you don't want to share your entry/exit rules...that's no crime of course and I respect that...but then I will make my own.
-
It's not fun when that sort of things happen but there is no better learning path (in my opinion) then the school of hard knocks... :crap: Sharing those stories will always make a few people a bit smarter and better prepared...
-
Yeah yeah...I know..."price rejection/acceptance" inside the squeeze... The KeltBB signal shown in the chart bring back a lot of early trading memories... I coded this thing when I was still a rookie trading idiot (I am still an idiot...but a seasoned one nowadays). Fun to see again...
-
Let me guess....that "juicier" way is the Keltner/BB squeeze...?
-
Hi Blowfish, You're right...my approach is radically different but I also respect the approach of Phantom. The only thing that is important (in my opinion) when you choose to present an trading approach on a forum like this is to specify the conditions when you take the trade or don't trade. For example....Phantom says he looks at volatility...is ATR, standard devation or something else leading...are there minimum volatilty values required....is there a minimum length (in bars, price or time) regarding the breakout before the hammer etc etc.... Only then you have a valid trade setup and that's something a lot of (newbie) traders simply do not understand... If the trade rules are clear I can code a "Phantom strategy" and provide some test results for those who are interested...
-
True and fair point...when it's free...a reader cannot complain about the quality...
-
Please explain in detail what your definition of price bar subtleties are and how Bollinger Bands, an EMA or MACD are capable to highlight these "subtleties"...?