Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

barryd

Members
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • First Name
    TradersLaboratory.com
  • Last Name
    User
  • City
    NY
  • Country
    United States
  • Gender
    Male

Trading Information

  • Vendor
    No
  1. Ok I mailed the developers and I got a response that cleared up the 2 issues: 1) I was being an idiot - a profit target of 1 in the EC is HUGE as it moves in 0.0001 increments. Something more realistic is 0.0015, apparently Clayburg uses something similar 2) The system requires an entry in the Stop_Loss field to work at all. Windsurfer - thanks, yes I have found stop_loss values between 150 and 300 seem to work best. I have been running optimizations for individual 1 week periods in the @ES to see how much the B1 S1 B2 S2 parameters change from week to week. The developers told me to use values between 8-20 as a guideline so I have been optimizing between those. It seems they change quite a lot - it's hard to know how often the system should be optimized to keep it profitable, perhaps a few times a day? If so, that will need a really high-end CPU and tons of RAM to chomp through so many input variables... I will continue to back test and may try running live in simulation mode tomorrow.
  2. I'm playing with the Universal Clone too and I'm seeing some strange results - can anyone else see if they get the same thing or give me an explanation of what I'm doing wrong? I'm testing using a 5 min EC chart starting from 5/11 until the start of 5/18 (last 5 days) on 'natural' exchange hours. When running parallel optimizations for the 2 Buy and 2 Sell inputs I get a max net profit (accounting for $5/contract commissions) of $4027 using the following: B1:5 B2:2 S1:5 S2:4 Target 1: 5 Target 1 contracts: 1 Target 2: 15 Target 2 contracts: 1 Target 3: 50 Target 3 contracts: 1 Stop Loss: 150 => No other trailing/day/equity stop toggles enabled (all set to 0) and start/stop hours left as default. This is amazing for 1 week (unlikely to ever happen, of course) however when I looked at the actual trades I could see most of the trades taken were stopped out using the '$ Trailing Stop' Sell/Buy to Cover - surely this should not have been enabled if all the input toggles actually work? Also, I also noticed a few anomalies when I played with the target inputs - I tried trading changing the profit targets as follows: Target 1: 1 Target 1 contracts: 1 Target 2: 2 Target 2 contracts: 1 Target 3: 3 Target 3 contracts: 1 i.e. I'm only looking to capture a maximum of 6 points/ticks on the entire trade if I'm not stopped out. In the EC, 6 ticks would equate to 6*$12.50 = $75, however in the 'Trade Log' I never saw any results for this. None of my trades ever achieved Profit Targets 1, 2 or 3 and all my trades were still stopped out using the '$ Trailing Stop' exit. Most peculiar of all was that my Total Profit remained at $4027 and I found the only parameter that changed this was my 'Stop Loss'. Increasing the Stop from $150 to $200 increased the total profit to $4140 - plausible I guess. Most interesting though was that putting in zero for the Stop Loss meant that NO trades were generated - why would this be the case??? Course, without being able to view the Easylanguage code I can't even begin to troubleshoot so I'm going to have to mail the developers, unless anyone else can help? Thanks, Barry
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.