Tams

you should start a new thread instead of hijacking this one. TradeStation is good for charting AND trading. MultiCharts is good. The price is right, the customer service is first rated.

you have to note the date and time of the bad tick, then go to QuoteManager to edit the data.

there is a discussion of Lateral Formation here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/34/price-volume-relationship-6320-113.html#post84429 you might want to add enhancements to this beta version after further investigation. 63.64

are you TransAct? is this an official statement? please declare your name and position.

Debt disaster fears rumble from Athens to London Game of chicken for bond spreads: Will E.U. honor 'no bailout' clause? Debt disaster fears rumble from Athens to London - MarketWatch Investors have rushed to sell Greek bonds since the newly elected government of George Papandreou made a startling revelation: the deficit will soar to over 12% of gross domestic product this year, well above previous official projections. Greece's predicament has escalated concerns about contagion in other European countries whose finances are in poor shape. Just this month, the ratings of Greece have been cut both by Fitch Ratings, and, late Wednesday, by Standard & Poor's, and major agencies have warned Spain and Portugal of possible cuts.

There are samples in the file. They will meet 90% of the popular requirements. 199

. like this... ? ADE - All Data Everywhere (EasyLanguage) http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/ade-all-data-everywhere-easylanguage-5934.html see also Multi Data Stream Analysis (EasyLanguage) http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f56/multi-data-stream-analysis-easylanguage-7165.html

>Do the eMini Futures Markets close over Xmas/New Year and should one trade over the xmas period. you should always check the respective exchange's website for this information

Great thread... wishing you another successful year. .

Have you tried another background color? .

There is historical/statistical significance in 68.268%, but no, I did not make the tests. You can Google "Importance of 68.268%" for more information. .

other volume analysis that might interest you: PRV -- Pro Rated Volume http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/prv-pro-rated-volume-5814.html Volume DayAverage http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/volume-dayaverage-5753.html Volume Weighed Color Bars http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/volume-weighed-color-bars-5709.html Volume Bias http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/volume-bias-6519.html 79.60.142 (55.118)

It is simple. That's why it is important to think things through first... before jumping into coding. To help see the logic... you must write out your thoughts step-by-step in a short line-by-line format.. Anything less than 100% is "negative". Just set the threshold to 100 and you will see the red for bars under 100%. I will let you think about why I had the Threshold at 68.268% Have fun

can you post your chart to show your reasons for the need to change? can you make the change, then show us another chart? is it better after the change? do you see any improvements?

.......... ..........

read this thread its all there

// Volume Percentage // based on a concept by arnie_pt // author: TAMS // date: 20091219 // license: public use. Retention of this header is required. // http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f56/help-formula-7276.html // {The premise is simple. Recording today's total volume traded between a specified time range and comparing it with the same previous day traded volume during the same specified time range. i.e. Today's reading will indicate the difference of traded volume when compared to yesterday's traded volume at that same time. Say, if today, at 10:05 AM, the ES has already traded 115.882 futures, what is the difference in %, when compared to yesterday's same time? I can say that this day, at 10:05 AM we had traded 129% more volume than the previous day at that same time. Simply said, this indicator lets you know in realtime the trade volume difference when compared to yesterday's traded volume. } input: Threshold(68.268), upcolor(blue), downcolor(red); var: Counter(0), Bar_count(0), VolPct(0), TodayVolume(0); {========== end of variables ==========} {----- beginning of new day, reset variables -----} if d <> d[1] then begin bar_count = counter; Counter = 0; TodayVolume = 0; end; {----- increment variables -----} Counter = Counter + 1; TodayVolume = TodayVolume + ticks; {----- calculate volume percentage -----} VolPct = ( TodayVolume / TodayVolume[bar_count] ) * 100; {----- plot -----} plot1( 0, "Zero" ); {so that bars automatically start at zero} plot10( VolPct, "VolPct" ); {set as histogram} plot11( threshold, "Threshold"); {set as line} if VolPct < Threshold then SetPlotColor(10, downcolor) else SetPlotColor(10, upcolor); {========== end ==========}

. create one more variable to hold the number of bars in a day. .

no... no loops. I said that before... no loops needed.

the Registration Code works without knowing who you are.

You should upgrade to MultiCharts version 6.0 beta 1. It has direct connection to OEC. This upgrade is free to all existing MC users.

be careful when using conditional filters... always leave the last option open, so that when you have an input other than 1,2,3, the indicator won't go astray. e.g. Inputs: Cycle_Price.Choice ( 1 ) , // 1 2 or 3 Vars: Cycle_Price(0), if Cycle_Price.Choice = 1 then Cycle_Price = ( $b_T3A.s((H+L+C+C)/4, 5, 2.3 )); else {<-- add} if Cycle_Price.Choice = 2 then Cycle_Price = ( $b_T3A.s((H+L+C+C)/4, 5, 2.9 )); else {<-- add} {if Cycle_Price.Choice = 3 then <--- delete} Cycle_Price = ( $b_T3A.s((H+L+C+C)/4, 3, 2.3 )); {<-- if choice is not 1 or 2, then use this method}

.......... is the rent control still in place?

.......... .......... Do I see $$$$$ in darn lines? ..........

Hi Arnie... Hope you are ok and wishing you a speedy recovery. 1. a few suggestions: When describing programming logics, get into the habit of writing SHORT sentences. Start a new line with every comma, and every period. This will help you to isolate the thoughts into sections of logics... so that you can attack each section with a fresh mind and not get confused with multiple logics at the same time. 2. YUP... The formula is correct. Let's put it in coding format: Can you tell WHY I knew the bar number was [3] ? (see prev diagram for clue) p.s. there is limitation to this method... we can discuss the limitation and solution later. let's figure out bar referencing first.