Chartsky

Most beginning traders make mistakes in real-time due to lack of experience, which translates into lack of patience and discipline, which means emotions are (mostly) driving their trading. Emotional trading = losing. More experienced traders can experience simple draw-downs as the markets they trade change. Anyone who denies they have draw-downs is fibbing. I would say more but have been warned by a "super moderator" I might get banned for "advertising" without paying the site for the privilege.

This is an interetsing conversation. I haven't read all 9-10 pages of this thread yet, but had a few thoughts. First, I think that scalping is alive and well and has just morphed into being done by HFT computers instead of locals in the pits. It used to be the locals could get better fills and were in-and-out with a few ticks before we could call-in to our broker, have him call the pit, place our orders and get confirmation numbers. Even if you did a lot of volume and had a dedicated phone line you were still slower that the locals. When markets went electronic, everyone effectively had the same shorter-time advantage and pit scalpers died out. Now electronic traders have to give way to HFT computer scalpers . . . who give way to those with faster computers . . . who give way to those with faster computers closer to the Exchange, etc. Second, "scalping" is a relative term. Going for 1-2 ticks is scalping but so too is going for 5-10 ticks in a fast market like CL (Crude Oil) or GC (Gold). All I've done is raise my level of scalping above the noise generated by the HFT computers' whip in those markets. I can't compete with the HFT computers for 1-2 ticks, or even 5-10, but can take out 10-15 -- which I still believe is scalping. But I disagree that the CME is still FIFO. At least without question. That's what was said for a long time before the existence of dark pools became known -- whereby HFT computers were allowed (for a price the Exchange didn't want to talk about) to "jump" the queue and get filled ahead of a limit order that had been sitting there a lot longer waiting for its fill. I've traded CL for years and have a system to pick turning points in advance (sometimes). I've had my limit orders sitting there and can see the DOM as it comes into them and there is a total of, say, 5 at my level. Part of that is me. Price has way too often come into that level, hit it exactly and turned and I didn't get filled. I know I should have been #1 or #2 in the queue and can only guess I was "jumped" by a HFT computer. I can't prove it though. Good Luck! Chartsky

LOL! I was still on November CL yesterday morning too. The volume had not dropped-off enough and you could have traded either month (November or December) in the morning. Monday folks will see a big difference in volume. Yes, the markets are "broken" and will stay broken as long as the FED keeps printing monopoly money and handing it to Goldman-Sachs and J.P. Morgan and the other insiders to gamble with, interest free. Wouldn't it be nice to have a "free" trading account that you could gamble with every day? Taking 100 lots in whatever market you wanted and, if you won big you kept the cash but if you lost the account would be magically funded again the next day . . . That's what our U.S. politicians are allowing right now. There's no other reason the stock market keeps rising with such a badly damaged U.S. economy. Bonds are up because the U.S. will not "default" in the near future. Good Luck! Chartsky

This formerly described me. When I would take a week off and travel (before I started taking a laptop) I needed at least a day to get back in rhythm. * * * * * Now I'm more like Soultrader . . . and if it weren't for my Trading Room, I'd trade 1-2 days a week and that's all. But I disagree with the time of day . . . I'd skip all the hysteria and whip in the mornings and only trade the Afternoon Session in Crude Oil and ES because you can make tons more money then (IMO). But you can also make money in the Morning Session, be done and play golf too. Just saying if I could pick only one time of day, it'd be the mid-afternoon Anyway, what helped me years ago was a pre-trading routine. Just like warm-ups for an athlete, I developed a routine that I stuck to every day I traded and still "practiced" a little on days I didn't. That way it didn't take me any time to get back in rhythm because I never gout out of rhythm Chartsky LIVE! Trading Room

@GlassOnion . . . I agree completely. To be successful in the long-term, a trader must remove as much emotion as he/she can from their trading. However, it's easier to understand the concept than it is to actually do it. I've traded full-time since 1999 and still, to this day, find myself allowing some emotion to creep-in at times. Mostly frustration with all the computer whip these days -- but that's still an emotion and it can cause me to take an entry I might not have taken without it. You've listed the ones most commonly discussed: fear, greed and hope I think folks should make a well-considered, written Trading Plan and stick to it. If you see a set-up that's not on your plan, as you review it and your charts each weekend, back-test over a year or so prior charts and, if it's still valid, then add that scenario and trade it from then on. If one stops working in a particular market, take it off. If a trade isn't on your Plan you can't take it. Period. Entries, stops and profit targets, as well as markets traded, Daily Profit Targets and Daily Loss Limits, realistic weekly and monthly goals are all included in the plan. That's one thing I did that helped me turn the corner years ago. Good Luck! Chartsky www.chartsky.com

@Predictor . . . I think you're saying the Hedge Fund Guy couldn't make much, or anything, being given $100K and limited by a $500/day loss limit? If so, I agree completely. I think we day traders that can make money consistently on such short-term trades could do it almost as well on a longer time frame . . . but I've found I don't enjoy exposure to these modern computer markets for any longer than necessary. I can also buy-sell-buy-sell-buy multiple scalps while a swing trade has a single leg extension. Chartsky www.chartsky.com

The best time to trade is when your particular market provides sufficient liquidity and opportunity for you to profit. This will be different for different markets and trader skill levels. For example, trading FDAX futures is best 3:00 a.m. (Eastern) to about 6:00 a.m. But if you tried trading ES during that time you'd have to go for smaller profit targets as it usually doesn't move as well. Now at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern) ES picks up and FDAX becomes computer-dominated and whippy. So you could trade ES over-night or FDAX during the day but you'd have to be on your game and would trade them differently. Trading currencies would be best from the European Open (3:00 a.m.) through the U.S. Morning Session, but Japanese Yen and Gold often move very well during the early Asian Session (8:00 p.m. Eastern). Of course, Gold moves well during the U.S. Session too almost every day. Look at some charts of the market(s) you're interested in. Both time-based and volume-based, or time-based with volume as an indicator. That will give you a good idea of where to focus. Years ago I chose to be selective . . . make my money and stop in a couple of hours to enjoy my kids and golf . . . and not be tied to my computer screen 24/5. Good Luck! Chartsky www.chartsky.com

I agree but think it's not likely that some institution with deep pockets is sitting there trying to manipulate price in order to snatch the rug out 1-5 minutes later. They don't have to. They scale into positions and that may be why you see apparently abnormal price/volume at times. You might be looking at the 1-3-5 minute charts but that institutional trader is looking at days-weeks-months. As far as the OP's topic (and I haven't read-through 14+ pages either), I find value in watching where a bar/candle closes when I'm scalping as it does sometimes allow me to get in a couple of ticks better and that's a big part of the scalp trade. Good Luck! Chartsky www.chartsky.com

This may be a little off-topic as far as how to read the DOM but I agree that you can hardly beat the ES market after major news, like Non-Farm Payroll or tomorrow's (9/18) FOMC Statement. The big boys (Hedge Funds, Retirement Administrators, etc.) have to adjust their positions many times and they don't just dump 50,000 contracts in at market. You can usually see where they're going as they're averaging in and jump on board with whatever volume you can afford to trade. And I don't usually wait more than 3-5 minutes but everyone knows how he/she does it best. Gold moves dramatically and Crude Oil is often hysterical, but trading 2 ES contracts is $25 per tick, 4 is $50 per tick and so on . . . and you can avoid the head-fakes from the more volatile, hysterical markets. But also watch the DOM. Volume basically dries-up to 1500 per side (or less) in ES and you can see the institutions coming in as volume on the DOM increases. Agreed. The head-fakes are amateurs who guessed (gambled) wrong. The big boys aren't usually interested in head-fakes at major news time. They have to get positions adjusted and buy/sell 50,000 or more contracts at the best prices available. Do they rush? No. They've got deep pockets and time on their side. But they also clearly show where they're going and I've found you can take little bites pretty easily. Good Luck! Chartsky www.chartsky.com

I've recommended MIRUS quite a few times and have not had anyone complain. They're very competitive on commissions and offer ZenFire and CQG data feeds (at least). I've been with another broker for years but if I ever switch I'll call MIRUS first. Good Luck! Chartsky

@eminifan . . . Trading on the Ninja Simulator (or any simulator) and trading under live market conditions are two completely different things. I've known and helped many folks who were Simulator Millionaires but who lost-lost-lost once the DOM went "live" with real money on the line. Mostly because emotions enter the equation then and change everything about your trading psychology. Also, TF has slippage you usually don't see in Sim but which is very real. Since you've cleared the first hurdle: consistently profitable on Simulator; the best way is to jump in with a single contract . . . set a realistic daily profit target and a daily loss limit and stop whenever you hit one or the other. Re-evaluate on weekends. Good Luck! Chartsky www.chartsky.com

:rofl: I'll be laughing at this one for days!

No, I didn't take anything you wrote that way at all . . . Yes. I day trade mostly Crude Oil now, but also currency futures. Couldn't sleep holding anything overnight in these times. But I got stuck with a "mentor" that tried teaching me and about a dozen others starting out (NO experience) on a 5-minute ES chart, but quickly moving down to a 1-minute ER2 chart, then an ER2 tick chart. NOBODY ever learned how to trade from him and, as I understand it, everyone else blew-out their accounts and quit. Eventually it became obvious the "mentor" was changing his "time-tested" systems at least every-other week and couldn't trade profitably himself. So, I looked over detailed notes taken (and now can't believe some of the things he taught) took what I had learned that seemed to work, and went to daily charts. When I was able to make money there, I went back intra-day. Now, a long time later, I'm trading 1-minute and ticks charts in CL. So I'm speaking from my own experience, but it sounds like you have even more experience working in a proprietary trading firm. Anyway, maybe this discussion will somehow prove helpful to others trying to learn.

And I'm going to politely disagree with a lot of what you said too. There is no X number of trades that equates to becoming a successful trader. Trading is more about what's going on between the trader's ears . . . his or her psychology . . . than anything. If they can learn more slowly, on daily bars, they CAN transfer most of that experience to faster intra-day bars. According to your analogy, the best way to teach someone to drive would be to put them in a NASCAR race rather than on a wide-open country road. I think most would crash and burn much faster in a NASCAR race than on the country road. I agree, but find the reality is that most newbies cannot successfully day trade. No one would argue that if you can day trade you can probably swing trade. No one would question whether NASCAR drivers can drive on country roads. The difference is in getting to where that person can day trade. Some will NEVER be able to day trade and some seem to be naturals. I'm talking about the others in between. Again, you're starting with someone who is a successful day trader. If you can trade for a year and basically break-even, you will probably succeed. Who wouldn't bet on a successful day trader over a 1-trade newbie? I do not think most could be thrown-in to day trading and break-even though and history showing that 90%+ blow-out their accounts seems to support this. I do think it's easier to take someone who has learned how to trade daily bars in a slower, more relaxed environment and translate their ability to shorter time frames. You think otherwise so we'll just have different opinions.