Patuca

thanks you for your kind and humble attitude. also the other person (gekko) that publically said uncle. you guys know when to take your stop losses. the other "smart" people on this thread must be too arrogant to accept their stop losses??? well except captain bob ..he did, however he did keep taking positions again after geeting stopped out. i suppose he saw "reversals" coming? ...i need a few more public "uncles" (four more "uncles" so i have 7 clear "uncles") to render up the "profit". either they will admit defeat...bite the bullet.. or feign "no interest".... puzzles can do alot for traders. teach us to accept losses. we can never learn to trade until we are willing to bite the bullet WAY BEFORE we blow our account. of course with MM it is "bite the golf club" (see thread on arm/disarm for more info). i am waiting..i have time... PS remember it is actually very simple. so simple you will be really pissed when the profit target is reached and you were stopped out. maybe the others aren't really arrogant but just have "bigger" stops and are swing puzzling instead day puzzling?? i may get banned for life???:rofl: :rofl:

how could he do this at exactly the same time? same day. same bridge. please explain.

well its about damn time they stood up and drove some fear into the SOB's In Mexico, self-defense squads battle violence - Yahoo! News too bad the poor bastards don't have decent weapons...due to the BAN ON GUNS of course...if they had some decent weapons they might drive the fear in faster and deeper....

people won't give up the magical word --- "uncle"

The Patuca River is a very tough jungle environment. no Holiday Inns. no real stores. no malls. forget hospitals or clinics. want electricity? bring your own.electricity. running water plenty- the river. Mostly foot paths and donkey trails . jaguars and dangerous snakes. You will sleeping most likely on river banks, in thatch roof houses when invited, under makeshift thatch huts, or in tents. it is a very hot humid environment. get ready for jungle rot. ready for a trip MM? we will get you another jackass down there so you won't have to ride one from your gunless abode. Ready? seize the day with passion and enthusiasm :rofl: :haha: PS you don't have to read about adventure. you can become the adventure!

plainly you DO live in fear. that is precisely "why" you want guns banned. you thought it (whatever it means) was a problem in the south and west and have now "awakened" to the fact that it is in your "neck" of the woods so you are fearful and your way of dealing with it is to ban the very thing you fear by legislation. you want the gov to deal with your fear by reassuring you that things are under "control" because they have passed a law. no need to hide behind the rhetoric. i will have to ban myself it looks like... i keep getting drawn back into this thread.

nope. it is a regular size Fixed bridge.

this post shows your true concern. btw couldn't resist. these guns may be banned next...or would it be ok to have a gun show with these guns? Kindergartner Suspended Over Bubble Gun Threat | ABC News Blogs - Yahoo! last post...hopefully....couldn't resist temptation.... see ...you give them an inch and they will take 1000 miles please call your politicians and have them push thru a bill to ban the pink "hello kitty, high capacity bubble tank, automatic assault weapon" i am quite sure it will hold at least several 100 bubbles. at 50 bubbles per minute it may be capable of drowning its victims in suds! :rofl: :haha:

he might be wanting you to assign him some home work??

i think i will leave this thread...again...enough has been said on both sides. my leaving comment is simply this. there comes a time when fighting fire with fire is the only tactical means of dealing with a very bad situation. a little water (or a lot) won't quench the fire in such a case. it has to be burn't out and its fuel source depleted. many here on this thread think that the fuel source is the "guns". i happen to think it runs much deeper than that. there is a certain evil boldness about these bastards. they have no fear. fear must be driven deep into them. sooner or later they will get the general idea that their sacrifice, or whatever warped view they have of what they are doing, will not stop society but that they themselves will be annihilated from off the earth by society. it will never completely stop but it can be slowed down considerably. banning guns from a sane society will only empower these bastards to do what they are doing, more often, and in worse ways. FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE bye bye now ya'll have fun arguing the debate i sometimes have a flair for the dramatic and hyperbole in debates, and i certainly don't agree with every view or thought espoused on this thread but don't take my hyperboles that serious or that personal..well some of them that is...:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :haha:

sorry but it doesn't work that way in the real world. your little formula falls by the way side. true, if you are speaking of just one person. not so against 100 million armed americans. remember it took about 10 years for our much vaunted armed forces to find and deal with ONE very well known bad guy. what makes you think they will wipe out 100 million americans in 3 seconds? first they wouldn't do it because they know the consequences. second they couldn't do if they wanted to. one yes. hundred yes..1000 possibly 10,000 well they would be pushing the envelope for a full scale revolt...100 million..no. i am not anti government. but i do think the constitution gives me the right to be armed and to stand against tyranny if it ever came down to it. armed citizens are a part of our system of checks and balances. standing against tyranny is hopefully an option that would never have to be employed. but if americans give up their guns they may well face that option one day and be caught with their pants down wearing pink lacy underwear. yes, that was an unfortunate accident. there also were car accidents the same day. many more were killed in cars accidents that same day. so lets ban cars. back to riding your jackass.

see what i am talking about..... arrogant americans...a trip to mexico or hondurans just might give you an attitude adjustment. don't think for a minute it can't happen here in the good ole USA. take our guns and it will happen here alot faster.

. i don't have to research it out. i have been there many times and seen it first hand. you are the one that is ignorant. not to mention afraid to have a pistol in your own home. you have no idea what you are talking about.

what war? the alternative is worse. it would be nice if there were no evil in the hearts of men and we could all live in peace without any arms. unfortunately, that isn't so. and banning guns won't take that evil out of their heart. they will find a way to do whatever evil they want to do. only force will stop them "dead" in their tracks. banning will take the option of force from the pop. that is, banning will actually EMPOWER the evil doers. this is what has happened in latin america. the police..military..government can't possibly stop a gun realted crime if an evil doer desire to commit one, they will. the authorities can only arrive after it is in progress or finished. there just isn't enough manpower to control crime. if real police..real guns..can't control it (because not enough) then how will legislation control it? the evil people are already lawbreakers in their hearts. we are naive to think that passing a new law will all of a sudden turn them into law abiding citizens. how will you determine who is nuts and who isn't? this last terrible shooting was apparently done by some kid who had a relatively high IQ. do people realize the enormity of putting into actual practice some sort of legislation as an attempt geared to stop people like this kid? it sounds good in theory but it simply will not work. however, at the grass roots level people can stop the escalation of a gun related crime and many times the crime itself if they are armed and happen to be on the spot when the crime takes place. if armed teachers were present at this last shooting i would dare say that this kid would have been stopped before he killed all those children. what would you have done if you were armed and just happened to be at that school when this kid started shooting? no law would have stopped him from commiting this atrocity. but armed teachers would probally have stopped it from escalating. childrens lives would have been saved. from my experience in my many travels i have yet to see where legislating or banning guns stops crime. so, if some bastard is trying to kill you the way to deal with it is to kill that bastard first. make him die for his actions not YOU die for his actions. but if laws take that option out of your hands then you are screwed. the poor bloke in this article below had a low probability of escaping this situation since he had no gun on his person. his biggest mistake was resisting the robbery when the odds were against him. in honduras before they rob you they (evildoers) are so brazen to sometimes actually pose the question to the victim "do you want this robbery to take place with, or without pain?" he should have just given them the camera. that would have given him more odds of escaping with his life. i was just down in honduras in this very same city. mm needs to visit mexico...honduras...belize...guatemala..el salvador...etc. many many lessons can be learned. and as much as we americans would like to think we "different" and are more civilized and happy; we aren't. we actually have less manners and are more unhappy than many of the pop in poverty stricken third world countries. of course drug related crime is part of the equation. but empowering those bastards and taking away the option of self defense from the pop isn't going to solve the problem. it is going to take all out real war against those bastards to stop it...at every level gov...grassroots. it will take an enormous amount of force. they have to run scared of the pop not the pop run scared of them. UK visitor shot dead in Honduras British tourist killed by robbers in Honduras - eTurboNews.com British tourist killed during botched mugging in Honduras - Yahoo! News

thh 3/8 hth 3/8 htt 3/8 tht 3/8 your sequence is htt. all the others have an equal probability on three tosses of being hit. now on being the sequence before yours not sure but i think it would be around 20% if there is one coin tossed 12 times. the problem is that the more coins tossed (participants in the contest) and the (amount of tosses) made, both affect the probabilities. i could be off on this but i think that the amount coins tossed and the amount of tosses somehow enters into the solution. it would seem that they would have to enter into the problem??? in general 1. Greater sample sizes produce more accurate probabilities 2. If the possible outcomes in which an element is present is increased, the probability of that element also increases. i'm just not sure how to apply 1 and 2 above into this problem. i never was too good at math anyway. too busy looking at the girls in school. too busy drawing pictures and shooting spit balls and other unimportant things while in class.

you are correct on that you are WRONG WRONG WRONG on this. gun control means LESS guns in circulation for the good guys and MORE guns in circulation for the bad guys. since only the criminals will have them there will be MORE murders, MORE armed robberies, and generally an unsafe environment. this is pure ivory tower BS. you spout out of your mouth. a quick visit by you and MM to mexico should be enough to convince you. so hop on your jackasses and ride down there. that would be bad. it would also be bad if they got killed in a car wreck by a drunk driver. it would also be bad if they lived in a tyranny. it would also be bad if MM hit them in the head with his golf club and cracked their skull. he who would give up his freedom for security deserves neither freedom nor security.

people die from gun shots. people die in car wrecks. people die from knife fighting. people die swimming. people die from operations. people die from worry. people die from eating. people die from drinking. people die from electricity. people die from drugs. people die. they always have. what you can't seem to get into that noggin of yours is that banning guns will not stop deaths from gunshots. in fact it will do the exact opposite. more people will die from guns. (again visit mexico) more people will be robbed. more people will have less recourse against the bad guys. worse banning guns will ultimately lead to tyranny. you MM will lose your country and your freedoms. history has proved this over and over again. ideas backed by people with guns got your liberties and freedom for you, and they will maintain them for you, or have you been ignoring all the posts matrix has been making of quotes that your ancestors said? (could it be you were not born here in America?).

jump on your jackass and take a donkey ride down to mexico. guns are illegal there. doesn't stop the bad people from getting them. they have the police and many times the military outgunned. there are many more murders there than when the population was armed in the 50's and 60's. now that they have no arms and the bad guys do (since regulation doesn't work) the pop trembles in their boots. the police tremble in ther boots. you jackass would tremble in his hoofs. just go. remember take no guns. no golf clubs :haha: you will see first hand what banning and regulation does to a country. unlike some of this ivory chair theory you guys spout out that will not work in the real world.

sure you dont want to walk :haha: did that stop the deaths from car accidents? many more die from cars than from guns. regulation doesn't stop it just gives more money to gov. its about time for you MM why tolerate car accidents? are you fearful? need your car? need psychological help? are cars a mask for other issues?

several people died in car wrecks today and it wasn't even car appreciation day! think progress. maybe like ...um riding donkeys. i know several jackasses that need to ride donkeys. some may be on this thread?? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: ps admin please note i said "may"

heads tails heads maybe Coins have no memory and one flip has nothing to do with another. Every flip starts out fifty-fifty. Three coin tosses. we have one chance of getting all heads, three chances of getting one head and two tails, three chances of getting two heads and one tail, and one chance of getting three tails. adding this together comes to 8, the probability of getting two heads and one tail is 3/8.

maybe we should ban pink bubble pistols?

a gun is an inanimate object. it can do nothing on its own. either gun can kill squirrels or people. i would guess they both have.

you mean like these adults? Pa. kindergartner suspended for bubble gun remark - Yahoo! News

Unintended Consequence oops just talking about banning guns and gun control has resulted in a huge increase in gun sales and ammo. that is, more people now have guns! great! keep talking you liberals. just wait, if they manage to actually impose a ban then sales will skyrocket..then the liberals will sh$t their pants.. :rofl: :haha: :cool: