Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Trading The News

Recommended Posts

Here is an interesting trade I took the other day. Thought I'de share this strategy.

 

The chart below shows Feb. 14th, 2007, the day Bernanke spoke at 10:00am EST. Now the markets did absolutely nothing until 10am. Everyone was waiting for Bernie to speak. On Fed days the markets usually do 1-2-3 move. (1-2-3 moves are... initial move up/down, reversal, and then third wave back in the original direction). However on Bernie speeches, the markets tend to just GO. The key to playing these moments is to get in early and not chase. Moves are usually very fast on the YM and they can take off over 30+pts in a matter of seconds.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=804&stc=1&d=1171574335

 

Okay.... lets get back to the chart. Price stalls right above value high pivot using it as support twice. The YM is pretty much stuck in a 15pt range from 12685 to 12700. Now what I did was use a bracket order with a buy stop at 12705 and a sell stop at 12680. The strategy is to get in asap in the direction of the move.

 

The important part is in this strategy is to pick your buy and sell levels carefully. Why 12680 and 12705?? 12683 is value high. My sell stop is placed 3 ticks below this value high pivot. The play would be to ride it down to value low at 12651.

 

Now, take a look at the chart below. 12703 is 2/9/07, Fridays high. 12700 is also a key psych level making this mark extra key. So my buy stop is placed at 12705.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=805&stc=1&d=1171574514

 

 

The markets did go and rally for about 30pts after the Bernie momo breakout and another 30pts in the afternoon. Take a look at your past charts, practice it, and tweak it. It's a pretty easy strategy but the key is picking your two buy/sell levels.

ymnewsplay.jpg.d120c30e86375108d79efacf7de2efdd.jpg

ymfridayhigh.jpg.55a2ba48b4356bf77ed3bbdfd7c31098.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are not many news events that are good for a straddle but the quarterly Bernanke testimony is one of them. I set up hotkeys for a straddle on my platform and hit them 2 seconds before 10 am, that way you can keep the straddle tight and get in at the best level. It's best to use stop-limit orders so you don't get slipped too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting notouch. How do you set up your stop-limits? I've never used that order-type before. I am currently researching the Bernie testimonies for a pattern and will add this to my setups once my research is done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use stop orders you're exposing your account to unlimited slippage at the time when the risk of slippage is highest. With a stop-limit order you can limit exactly how much slippage you're willing to take. How you set up your stop-limit order depends on what volatility you're expecting and how much slippage you're willing to take. Also make sure your order is held at the exchange rather than at your broker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

notouch, so how do you set up your stop limits? Do you specify how much slippage you want to take? I've never used them and am curious to learn more. The way I understand it is, let's say the market is moving up fast. You set a buy-stop order at say 800.00 on the ER2, for example. The moment the buy-stop is triggered, the order turns into a buy-limit order at a pre-determined amount. So, if I want no more than 5 ticks slippage I would set the buy limit order to 800.50. Is that how it works?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

keymoo,

 

If you set your buy limit at 800 flat.. you will get either a partial or full fill at 800 exact. If you get filled half of your position at 800.... but your other half never gets through, the half position will never be filled. This protects you from getting filled let's say a point away from your market order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  keymoo said:
notouch, so how do you set up your stop limits? Do you specify how much slippage you want to take? I've never used them and am curious to learn more. The way I understand it is, let's say the market is moving up fast. You set a buy-stop order at say 800.00 on the ER2, for example. The moment the buy-stop is triggered, the order turns into a buy-limit order at a pre-determined amount. So, if I want no more than 5 ticks slippage I would set the buy limit order to 800.50. Is that how it works?

 

That's exactly how it works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A very interesting concept. I have used a strategy similar to this to trade FED day and it does work although the risk I had to deal with was that I had to set up an OCO plus stops and targets on two trades in a very short period of time. If I got it wrong and placed one of my orders too close to the market I could get stopped in on a false move (eg not on move 1 of the 1-2-3)

 

Does anyone know where I can get a timetable of these Bernanke statements?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest KhurramNaik

A good resource to use as well is briefing.com/investor to get economic indicator releases. They also let you know which ones matter, what the data says about the economy and what the consensus expectation is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Millard,

Thanks for that link to news on FOMC numbers, but I was referring to Soultraders initial posting that said...

 

"Everyone was waiting for Bernie to speak. On Fed days the markets usually do 1-2-3 move. (1-2-3 moves are... initial move up/down, reversal, and then third wave back in the original direction). However on Bernie speeches, the markets tend to just GO."

 

I'm keen to know where I can find out about this Bernie speeches?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What, you want the actual transcripts of his speeches? Or just to know when he's due to speak?

 

The actual dates & times will be available on the calendar, one of which KhurramNaik recommended. There are one or two others doing the rounds. I guess if you have a feed into one of the relay channels, you'll get an abridged summary of his dialogue if it warrants it. The business cable facilities such as Bloomberg or CNBC occasionally screen them too.

 

The important part is knowing when he's speaking, what the agenda is & the relevance to the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only Bernie speech that really moves the market is his quarterly testimony. It's quarterly so not too hard to work out when the next one is. In all his other speeches he tends to avoid making controversial statements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My approach, if he is to speak , just watch price action and volume, the smarter people who knows what the heck he's talking about will lead the way.

 

I not only try to keep trading simple, but I'll dumb it down to my level of understanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these Bernie's testimonies the most important news to trade? I never traded one, but will make sure to try the next. So far I have traded but the rate statements and some others like nfp, cpi and ism. And crude oil stocks when I remember.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As caveat I think newbies should not be trading the news until they get a good few years under their belt.

 

On the otherhand I personally use Ben Lichtenstein's traders audio s&p 500 squawk box broadcast to get a context of how the locals and commercial traders on the trading pit floor are reacting to major news and I'll take a position in their direction if there is conviction in the move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  juniorh said:
As caveat I think newbies should not be trading the news until they get a good few years under their belt.

 

On the otherhand I personally use Ben Lichtenstein's traders audio s&p 500 squawk box broadcast to get a context of how the locals and commercial traders on the trading pit floor are reacting to major news and I'll take a position in their direction if there is conviction in the move.

 

How and/or when do you know the conviction is there? Sure you've got some signal for acting?

 

Thanks

Kuokam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too would suggest that generally a trader avoids trading the news unless you have adequate experience under your belt. Rather an astute trader would be focusing on deciphering how the news is being interpreted by the market. To quote

 

“All media exists to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values” Marshall McLuhan, (1911-1998)

 

With this in mind I believe the news is often a misdirection to what the smart money is doing or simply elaborate chit chat to fill the void of airtime.

 

Got this guide to a trader interpreting the news from an article i read recently:-

 

The following table from an article "How to trade the news" at iTradePod displays the basic news/market sentiment relationship:-

 

 

 

[LT Direction News DT Direction Sentiment Indication

 

1. UP BEARISH UP VERY BULLISH

 

2 UP BEARISH DOWN NEUTRAL; EXPECTED

 

3 UP BULLISH UP BULLISH

 

4 UP BULLISH DOWN VERY BEARISH

 

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  kuokam said:
How and/or when do you know the conviction is there? Sure you've got some signal for acting?

 

Thanks

Kuokam

 

 

Koukam,

 

An example of typical directional conviction is when Ben mentions that Locals are stuck Short with Commercials raising Offers (going Long).

 

At that point I am usually already Long (depending on the Market Profile type of open) with the Commercials and will add further portions if/when Ben shouts out that the Locals have reversed their prior Short bias to join the Commercials on the Offer, a heads up of further momentum in the upward price action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.