Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Essential Elliott Wave Patterns Pt. 2

Recommended Posts

Essential Elliott Wave Patterns Pt. 2

 

In part one of this article, we look at four basic Elliott Wave patterns that are necessary for understanding and implementing this form of technical analysis. These patterns included Motive Waves, Diagonals (or Diagonal Triangles), Corrective Waves, and Double and Triple Zigzag patterns. It is important to have a firm understanding of the rules that govern these patterns, so if you have not yet read the first section of the article, you should do so now. This is important because this is the only way to ensure you will not be mistaking one of those patterns for the patterns discussed in this article. It is also important to have an understanding of the patterns in the first section because some of the rules for the following patterns build on the structures covered in part 1.

 

Like all forms of technical analysis, there is some degree of subjectivity involved when identifying and using these patterns, so without an understanding of the rules of all Elliott Wave patterns, it would be unwise to place live trades based on this analysis. In the following sections, we will cover Flats, Double and Triple Sideways patterns, and Expanding and Contracting Triangles. This collection will round out the set of essential Elliott Wave patterns that will be needed in order to conduct this form of analysis.

 

Flats

 

In Flats, we have an Elliott Wave pattern that unfolds in a three-wave structure that proceeds in a sideways direction -- meaning there is no series of higher highs or lower lows, and instead looks more like a trading range. These patterns are labeled using the A-B-C format, and are corrective in nature. Since Flats move sideways, they are considered to be “counter-trend” as they do not agree with any bullish or bearish wave structures. Flats are one of the most common patterns in Elliott Wave analysis. The first charted example is a Flat. Notice the lack of directional movement, as it is essentially a sideways patter.

 

Rules for Flat Formations:

 

1) Wave A is a corrective pattern that can take any form.

2) Wave B is also corrective pattern, and can take any form except that of a Triangle.

3) Wave B retrace at least 50% of the price movement that is seen in Wave A.

4) The price movement in Wave B is less than 2-times that of Wave A.

5) Wave C is either an Impulse Move or Ending Diagonal.

6) Wave C must cross into the price territory of Wave A.

 

Double and Triple Sideways

 

Double and Triple Sideways patterns (which are sometimes called Double 3s or Triple 3s) possess some similarities when compared to Flats. Typically, Double and Triple Sideways patterns consist of two or three corrective patterns that are connected by a joining wave. This joining wave is called an “x” wave. Double and Triple Sideways patterns are corrective in nature, but the Triple Sideways pattern is must less common. The labeling format for the Double Sideways is w-x-y. For Triple Sideways, the labeling is w-x-y-xx-z. In the second charted example, the Double Sideways (the more common formation) is shown. Note the dual A-B-C formations that are connected by the middle X wave. The third charted example shows the difference between the Double and Triple Sideways formations.

 

Rules for Double and Triple Sideways Patterns:

 

1) Wave W is a corrective pattern but cannot be a Triangle, Double or Triple Zigzag or its own

Sideways pattern.

2) Wave X is a corrective pattern but cannot be a Triangle, Double or Triple Zigzag or its own

Sideways pattern.

3) Price moves seen in Wave X must retrace at least 50% of Wave W.

4) Wave Y is a corrective pattern but cannot be a Double or Triple Zigzag or its own Sideways

pattern.

5) If Wave W is a Zigzag, Wave Y cannot be a Zigzag.

6) Price moves in Wave Y cannot be more than 2-times the price move seen in Wave W.

7) If Wave Y is not a Triangle, it must be at least as long as the price move seen in Wave X.

8) Wave XX is a corrective pattern but cannot be a Triangle, Double or Triple Zigzag, or its own

Sideways pattern.

9) The XX Wave must retrace at least 50% of the price move seen in Wave Y.

10) Wave Z is a corrective pattern but cannot be a Double or Triple Zigzag, or its own Sideways

pattern.

10) If Wave Y is a Zigzag, Wave Z cannot be a Zigzag.

11) The price move seen in Wave Z must be longer than the price move seen in Wave XX.

 

Contracting and Expanding Triangles

 

A Triangle is a very important Elliott Wave pattern that consists of a regular 5-wave corrective pattern, and uses the labeling format A-B-C-D-E. Since Triangles are corrective, it is important to remember that these moves run counter-trend. Triangles also operate within two channel lines (which are essentially shorter term trend lines) that drawn to connect waves A to C, and waves B to D. There are two types of Triangles: Contracting (sometimes abbreviated CT) or Expanding (sometimes abbreviated ET). Whether a Triangle is a CT or ET depends on the direction of the channel lines. When the channel lines move closer together, a Contracting Triangle is in place. When the channel lines move further apart, an Expanding Triangle is in place. Expanding Triangles are rarer than Contracting Triangles. The final charted examples show graphics that illustrate both forms.

 

Rules for Contracting and Expanding Triangles:

 

1) In an Expanding Triangle, all waves must be a Zigzag, Double Zigzag, or Triple Zigzag.

2) In a Contracting Triangle:

- Wave A can only be a Zigzag, Double Zigzag, Triple Zigzag or a Flat.

- Wave B can only be a Zigzag, Double Zigzag, or Triple Zigzag.

- Wave C will be a corrective pattern but cannot be a Triangle.

- Wave D will be a corrective pattern but cannot be a Triangle.

- Wave E can only be a Contracting Triangle, Zigzag, Double Zigzag, or Triple Zigzag.

3) The cross-section of the channel lines is seen past the end of a Contracting Triangle, and before the beginning of an Expanding Triangle.

4) The channel lines will always be converging or diverging. Essentially, these lines can not parallel or forming a range.

5) Only one channel line in a Contracting Triangle can be horizontal.

6) Neither channel line in an Expanding Triangle can be horizontal.

7) The end-point of Wave E must enter into the price territory of Wave A.

 

Conclusion: Elliott Wave Patterns Build Off of One Another

 

Elliott Wave theory works on the assumption that market psychology repeats itself in the form of wave movements that build into larger patterns. In this way, Elliott’s theories are somewhat similar to Dow Theory, given the fractal nature of both approaches to technical analysis. Elliott Wave theory dissects markets into much greater detail, however, as these structures can inwardly repeat themselves indefinitely. Impulsive Waves travel with the trend, and unfold in five-wave patterns. Corrective waves work counter-trend in groups of three and push prices back toward the mean. These 5-3 moves complete the trend cycle, but it is important to watch the specific rules of each pattern to ensure the validity of the overall analysis.

Flat.png.f29f1084cc4d3680dcf133fb21117e33.png

5aa711ff10b21_DoubbleSideways.jpg.43b6909178c4b494ae716e7f44635353.jpg

5aa711ff139ea_DoubleTriple.PNG.ad3d3247f7054163a02fd4c6ab8da5eb.PNG

CT.gif.9613df845104c446a821f296a7db2512.gif

ET.jpg.bd4967029782b65355a77aa8f87568d2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest muhitalam

I just read ``Essential Elliott Wave Patterns Pt. 2`` article. i appreciate you for this. As i am new trader can you brief me little more about this. Very much looking forward to hearing from you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.