Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

stasbz

Depth Market: is It Useful Information?

Recommended Posts

Hello!

times and sales is useful information.

But what about depth market? Can we determine buy and sell pressures?

i have watched ES and down trand day were more orders on offer and up trend day were also more orders on offer, but market goes up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..................................................................

When the bid is stacked on the DOM one would guess that there are many traders trying to buy at the same time. since there appears to be more buyers than sellers. One could look at it and think the market is poised to go higher. This guess could cause an unsuspecting buyer (either a weak long or a scared short) to buy via market order so as to not be left behind. Those with the large buy orders are actually trying to get buyers to jump ahead of the bid and buy right into their standing sell orders. The buy orders are almost all fakes and are really sellers who have standing sell orders and want to get filled as high as possible. Once sold and presumably ( for this example) short, then they will distribute more contracts or shares into the standing buy orders and attempt to force the weak longs who enter long to sell lower into the sellers standing buy orders.

 

There are multiple variations of how this can unfold. you can get clues by watching the DOM and T&S. So, for example, if the bid is stacked and there are a lot of trades going off at the ask, you can expect a different reaction than if the ask is stacked and there are a lot of trades going off at the ask.

 

You can gain good information by watching both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dom and T&S, in my mind, provide the the most immediate view of the current market conditions that are available You're going to need to become a student of that particular market to effectively use the DOM and T&S. There are a lot of different combinations of what you can see and you need to learn what each of those mean when the market is at the high for the day, the low, with high volume, low volume, no volume, net selling, net buying, inside buying, outside buying, inside selling, outside selling, etc.It takes time to learn what each combination means but it is worth it because when you understand what is going on, then you will be on the right side of the market and have confidence to stay in longer and get bigger gains.

 

You'll also learn how blind you have been and why 90% (or whatever percentage is right) lose. Markets do not move because of a particular pattern exists; instead they move because there are enough traders willing to buy above the bid or sell below the ask. Generally, the opposite of the expectation happens a lot when a popular pattern exists.

.

Edited by MightyMouse

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, most depth of market products are designed so poorly that they offer very little use to me as a trader other than order entry. I have hassled companies in the past such as Ninja to see if they might implement some changes, but to no avail. In my opinion currently the only product which allows you to properly 'read' the DOM is Trading Technologies X-Trader. Btw you will need a pretty decent connection if you wish to trade in this way. An alternative method for reading the information the DOM should provide is by using bid x ask style charting which was made popular by Market Delta (I believe). It is available via other platforms now. Sierra I think have it. You can pay for Ninja add-on indicators which use it. I'm sure there are others too.

 

I don't really use the market order book depth much in the sizes queuing, although it can be useful if you watch it a lot to see when the 'game playing' is about to begin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Dom and T&S, in my mind, provide the the most immediate view of the current market conditions that are available You're going to need to become a student of that particular market to effectively use the DOM and T&S. There are a lot of different combinations of what you can see and you need to learn what each of those mean when the market is at the high for the day, the low, with high volume, low volume, no volume, net selling, net buying, inside buying, outside buying, inside selling, outside selling, etc.It takes time to learn what each combination means but it is worth it because when you understand what is going on, then you will be on the right side of the market and have confidence to stay in longer and get bigger gains.

 

You'll also learn how blind you have been and why 90% (or whatever percentage is right) lose. Markets do not move because of a particular pattern exists; instead they move because there are enough traders willing to buy above the bid or sell below the ask. Generally, the opposite of the expectation happens a lot when a popular pattern exists.

.

 

I'd love to see some examples of this MM. Sounds great in theory, but care to elaborate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, the DOM ranks very low in usefulness, and I no longer monitor it. I look to the bid/ask and t&s when an action is required. Almost 100% of my monitoring is spent on price and volume on the charts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd love to see some examples of this MM. Sounds great in theory, but care to elaborate?

 

There is nothing exact nor scientific about it.

 

There is an incredible amount of detail needed to describe it, but i will give it a shot

 

Take an example of when price is high in a range (any time frame), volume is low, price range is wide, and the delta is low. If I were long, I would want to see the offer stacked( more orders on the ask side of the dom) and the trades taking place on the offer. You will be able to see the traders occurring on the T&S to determine if the trades are occurring at the offer.

 

The trades that occur at the offer are patient sellers and aggressive buyers. Patient sellers are typically going to be traders who try to sell high and buy back lower or traders who bought below and have standing limit sell orders. The aggressive buyers are either aggressive longs or shorts that are running for cover.

 

If I am already long, I need to determine if I want to exit, stay, or add. If the trades occur at the offer and offer is stacked and the market has been spending a lot of time in a smaller range up at the high, I will take the breakout of that range as my cue for what to do next. If we break out up, then i stay and decide if I am going to add. I stay long, because I can expect the patient sellers will begin to cover which will add to the trades occurring at the offer and prices will rise which is good for my long. You can see this occurring in the T&S. I also want to see the offer remain stacked.

 

If we break out lower, I will exit the trade. I will exit because it appears to me that the aggressive buyers are going to be made to cover lower so I need to be out of my long. This could be the wrong decision if the aggressive buyers were actually just traders covering their shorts. Now you have a potential scenario where there are a lot of patient sellers who are short and they have no one to buy back from. I would get back in long ( at a better or worse price) if the dom was again stacked on the offer and we broke out higher of a smaller range within the larger range.I would not get back in long if the bid was stacked and the trades where occurring at the offer.

 

Given the same original scenario where we are at the high end of a range, but instead the bid is stacked, I would not stay in if the trades where occurring at the offer. In fact I would get out right away instead of waiting for the price to break out of a smaller range.

 

I hope this makes some sense in how to make use of the T&S and the DOM in trading decisions. it is easier and faster to think this than it is to type and describe it.

 

MM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to see a great example of how the DOM can be used to make trading decisions, download some market replay for Wednesday, August 31, for the October CL contract, and watch things around 7:30am to 8:30am. Notice the heavy bids on the DOM on the lows, and notice how despite the best efforts from the sellers in several different tries, how the sellers keep hitting the bids at the low, and simply can't take it lower. I bought .80 (IIRC), low was .67 I think. This is an example of REAL bids, getting eaten up, not spoofing. The sellers were simply relentless, and the bids kept holding. Low risk, good trade location (which is most important IMO).

 

One of the things I have found useful is to watch the tape and DOM after a price reversal at a potential turning point, say after a nice move up at a previous day's high--after sellers have held the prior day's high, and taken it down a bit, buyers will of course (99% of the time) buy back to try one more time after a small retrace. When this happens, sometimes you will see orders at the offer going off very quickly, yet price does not move up. Say the high was 89.10, we've retraced down to 88.90, and buyers buy back up to 89.00. At 89.00, if there are heavy buy orders going at the offer at 89.00, yet 89.00 cannot even go bid, then what you may be seeing is a good confirmation that sellers are convinced that a reversal is in play, and they are wanting to get in before a nice reversal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
* * *

One of the things I have found useful is to watch the tape and DOM after a price reversal at a potential turning point, say after a nice move up at a previous day's high--after sellers have held the prior day's high, and taken it down a bit, buyers will of course (99% of the time) buy back to try one more time after a small retrace. When this happens, sometimes you will see orders at the offer going off very quickly, yet price does not move up. Say the high was 89.10, we've retraced down to 88.90, and buyers buy back up to 89.00. At 89.00, if there are heavy buy orders going at the offer at 89.00, yet 89.00 cannot even go bid, then what you may be seeing is a good confirmation that sellers are convinced that a reversal is in play, and they are wanting to get in before a nice reversal.

 

A nice description of an actionable event. I monitor for essentially the same data but on the inside bid/ask and t&s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you want to see a great example of how the DOM can be used to make trading decisions, download some market replay for Wednesday, August 31, for the October CL contract, and watch things around 7:30am to 8:30am. Notice the heavy bids on the DOM on the lows, and notice how despite the best efforts from the sellers in several different tries, how the sellers keep hitting the bids at the low, and simply can't take it lower. I bought .80 (IIRC), low was .67 I think. This is an example of REAL bids, getting eaten up, not spoofing. The sellers were simply relentless, and the bids kept holding. Low risk, good trade location (which is most important IMO).

 

One of the things I have found useful is to watch the tape and DOM after a price reversal at a potential turning point, say after a nice move up at a previous day's high--after sellers have held the prior day's high, and taken it down a bit, buyers will of course (99% of the time) buy back to try one more time after a small retrace. When this happens, sometimes you will see orders at the offer going off very quickly, yet price does not move up. Say the high was 89.10, we've retraced down to 88.90, and buyers buy back up to 89.00. At 89.00, if there are heavy buy orders going at the offer at 89.00, yet 89.00 cannot even go bid, then what you may be seeing is a good confirmation that sellers are convinced that a reversal is in play, and they are wanting to get in before a nice reversal.

 

Your are describing almost the perfect opposite of my example at the high.

If I was short in your first scenario, with price at a low, I would want the dom to be stacked on the bid. I would want to see an increase in volume and trades going off at the bid on T&S and I would like the delta to be net higher for the range to stay short. If price stayed in a small range for a relatively decent amount of time and then broke out of that range up, then I would exit my short. I would give up whatever the range was, typically 10-25 ticks, from the low.

I would not enter long until I got a minimal price reversal and solid signs that the result of the trades at the bid was aggressive selling and not just weak longs exiting and I would want to see the bid and offer reverse polarity so that the offer is stacked and trades going off at the offer.

 

The added step to get long is my way of making sure that the trades that occurred at the bids were aggressive sellers and not just weak longs exiting. If they were weak longs, getting stopped out, I wouldn't expect a price move back up. If there were aggressive sellers shorting at the low, they are likely going to be made to cough up their positions higher.

 

I am not suggesting this is the right way. This is not science. I am describing, as in my previous post, what I do to make myself feel confident to remain in a trade or exit a trade using the dom and t&s.

 

Josh, this should look somewhat familiar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am not suggesting this is the right way. This is not science. I am describing, as in my previous post, what I do to make myself feel confident to remain in a trade or exit a trade using the dom and t&s.

 

Josh, this should look somewhat familiar.

 

Thanks MM, good stuff, and from what you have explained to me before, yes it is familiar, only I have a better understanding of it now that I have seen more and more of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my experience, most depth of market products are designed so poorly that they offer very little use to me as a trader other than order entry. I have hassled companies in the past such as Ninja to see if they might implement some changes, but to no avail.
Yep, Ninja doesn't listen. They're probaly happy with the money they are making already and dont care to improve anything. But also TT might have a patent for some of the features like the little box next to the BID/ASK that shows how many orders printed at that price...Not sure.

 

In my opinion currently the only product which allows you to properly 'read' the DOM is Trading Technologies X-Trader Btw you will need a pretty decent connection if you wish to trade in this way.
Do you mean someone needs to have a fast internet connection. How fast specifically?

 

I don't really use the market order book depth much in the sizes queuing, although it can be useful if you watch it a lot to see when the 'game playing' is about to begin.
Can you explain what this size queuing is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.