Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Open and Free Discussion on Volume

Recommended Posts

Here in the candlestick corner, I enjoy having discussions and let threads run where they may. There are some good threads here that may have started w/ talking about candlesticks and later diverged into something more. And that's great! It's kind of the point of a discussion forum - to have discussions.

 

So this thread will focus (initially at least) on discussing volume and whether or not it is important in your trading work.

 

I think there's 2 simple sides people can take here:

 

1) Volume is important and can play a huge role in their analysis

 

2) Volume is unimportant and/or just another useless indicator

Alright, you probably guessed I am a little biased here, but allow me to explain how I view volume in intraday trading.

 

In a nutshell, volume can be a tricky thing when watching intraday - as you may have seen, there are plenty of games being played on the dom, and that includes FILLED orders. You can see bids/asks being flashed all over, some fill and that may look great on your screen, but the real question about that volume you are watching is - is that true buying or selling volume/pressure/interest/etc OR is that some entity attempting to get you to believe price is moving in some direction OR is that simply an entity exiting a previous trade? There's more reasons, but it's getting late here; you get the idea.

 

In addition, how many times do you see low volume areas for an extended period and then bam, a big surge on volume? Quite a bit on the futures markets. That's all well and good, but do you really want to wait to get into a trade AFTER the real volume has come through? ... Personally, I'm looking to get in BEFORE the real volume comes through and if I am right, I get to ride the wave and hopefully a big one.

 

I personally spent quite a bit of time working w/ volume and seeing if there was something there for me. After many long hours, I concluded that using volume on intraday charts was not for me. That's not to say it can't work, but it did not work for me.

 

In the end, there is no right or wrong answer regarding volume and it's importance in your trading. You do need to find what works for you and I'm here to say that you don't need volume anywhere on your charts whatsoever - no volume based indicators and/or volume itself.

 

And that is my :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think we mix up issues and then get into controversy.

 

1. Demand and supply are intrinsic to the working of the market. Without buyers and sellers interacting , their activity being reflected in transactions ie. volume, there would be no market. Hence volume is activity or effort if you like to put it that way and the resulting move or lack of it, is the result of that activity. Wyckoff studied this aspect and understood it well enough to read the market to be able to anticipate and trade.

 

2. Now one can choose to study these price/vol dynamics and incorporate them into their trading strategies/tactics. For that trader Volume is important. We are not talking about DOM, time/sales, bid/ask etc here.

 

3. Others and there are many successful traders doing just that, trade without looking at the volume bars on their charts and employ other technical analysis to guide and provide them with aa framework and structure to trade ie. RSI, CCI divergence, fib numbers, gann, elliot , candlestick patterns, moving averages etc.

Infact if you look at Al Brooks latest book, he trades entirely from just one single 5min chart with one moving average and trendlines/channels. I have communicated with him, he has gone through every indicator out there, including volume studies and probably understands the patterns that he outlines in his book well against that background, so he does not need to have the volume bars on the chart. However he does mention volume climax etc and many of the charts in the book do have vol. bars.

So it appears that that if you study price/vol long enough and observe the patterns forming just like looking at RSI divergence and price action long enough, you eventually reach a point where you may not require these on the charts.

 

Anyway the point of all this is Volume is the engine which drives the market.

However whether it is important to trading is a personal choice. Hence as you say there is nothing right or wrong. So really there should be no clashes between those who use it and those who do not,:)))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree Monad. And here in a discussion forum, we can discuss - at least in the part of the forum that I moderate. I have no desire to shut down threads when there's a viable discussion there.

 

I like your point that volume drives the market b/c obviously nothing would be going on if there was zero volume. Makes sense.

 

The next question that a trader must make is whether or not that volume that is there is a worthwhile thing to be tracking intraday. Personally, like your mention of Al Brooks, I have not found any use in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that volume drives the market.

 

Regarding tracking volume intrady: One thing I like to look at is volume in the first part of the morning (in ES). I compare the first 15 to 30-minutes of the morning volume with similar periods over the last 10 days. It often tells me what kind of day to expect. For example, if volume is significantly higher during these periods compared with the first 15 to 30 minute periods of the past two weeks, it suggests that larger interests may be coming into the market. If the market is trading on one side of the open and gives us a wide range or wide candle body early on (first 15 to 30-minutes), then I am looking for a trend day.

 

On the other hand, if volume is just average or especially below average, I am expecting more of a range-bound market where fading tests of yesterday's highs or lows might come into play. If it is really low, then it's likely an NR day.

 

Usually on the intraday, volume is heaviest in the early hours of the session and in the last hour or two. It tends to be lighter between these two periods (the 'volume smile'). If, though, volume picks up significantly when it is usually ebbing, it can be significant. If we get that in the early part of the afternoon, often it will result in a directional move into the close.

 

These are just a couple of observations, FWIW. I think it is useful to have a 'mental map' of the market, and for me, volume figures pretty promentently in that map, but this is my personal take and others may see it differently. BTW, I am looking at the total NYSE volume during the day for this.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly, a relationship exists between both Price and Volume. Those who disagree simply have yet to see that which exists right in front of their nose. By understanding how all markets exhibit a fractal nature, one can take the first steps required to see the Price / Volume Relationship in action - irrespective of market and / or time frame used to trade.

 

For example, using the ES 5 minute chart, and only making decisions and taking action at the close of a 5 minute bar, the market provides crystal clear information as to where Price sits with respect to the Volume Sequences which require completion. By 'containing' Price within these Volume Sequences, the market reveals its trends across three seperate fractals each day - every day.

 

Volume leads Price.

 

Always.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Volume produces price. Volume is a graphic of trader effort. Price is the result of trader effort. No trader, no volume. No volume, no price. No price, nothing.

 

I think that volume is important to the extent that it enables you to make a good guess as to what the motives of the traders are. IMO you can still trade profitably using price and price only, but if you want to give your analysis that extra depth, then volume would be a useful tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand how volume can really be used on an intra-day basis. It seems like a lot find signals based on volume, but I'd venture to guess they could find the same signals based on nothing but price?

 

Seeing as how volume and price occur simultaneously, volume is reflecting what "has happened already," I don't get it?

 

It seems like a good trader that has traded price for years could apply MACD to their trading and it would still be profitable in a similar fashion that some may successfully apply volume?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both price and volume are indications of transactions. Transactions change both volume and price simultaneously. Volume does not "create price" or "lead price". Combining price and volume data simply gives more information about order flow than price data alone. Maybe not more information, since everything is revealed in the price eventually, but more timely information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
I don't understand how volume can really be used on an intra-day basis. It seems like a lot find signals based on volume, but I'd venture to guess they could find the same signals based on nothing but price?

 

Here is a hypothetical example: Price is making continuous higher highs and higher lows. The up-trend started quick producing a steep trend line, but over time the trend line got less and less steep until price just stopped and went sideways. The bears are not taking price down or they are unable to. The bulls are resting or they are done. Or the bulls and bears are fighting for power. Now check volume. If volume is low at the top then bulls are either resting (unlikely based on previous price action) or they are worn out. But the bears are equally not present and this is beacuse they are waiting for higher prices, or because they are unsure, or because there just are not enough bear traders (new shorts and previous bulls selling their longs and turning into bears). If volume is high, then the bulls and the bears are fighting for dominance. The bears will most likely win based on the length of the up-trend, but the bulls could still win out if they attract a strong following of new bulls. If the bears win out then when price action starts to drift downwards the bulls who entered in at the top would be compelled to sell and possibly become new bears, adding to the supply. Either way, if the up-trend was a lengthy one, then there is a good chance that the bulls will be unable to proceed as the majority of the bulls who wanted to express their opions have already done so.

 

  Quote
Seeing as how volume and price occur simultaneously, volume is reflecting what "has happened already," I don't get it?

 

Volume and price are reflecting what has happened already. No matter what you see on your charts, it is all past action.

 

  Quote
It seems like a good trader that has traded price for years could apply MACD to their trading and it would still be profitable in a similar fashion that some may successfully apply volume?

 

To me anyways, trying to guess,based on previous action, where price is most likely to go is just plain fun. I would rather develop my own opinion on the market than have some formula based indicator tell me what is happening. I would rather potentially profit (or lose) from my own analysis than have some indicator "guarantee" me profit (or loss). But, I am here because I am having fun. If I was not having fun, I would not be here.

Edited by matinthehat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  euclid said:
Both price and volume are indications of transactions. Transactions change both volume and price simultaneously. Volume does not "create price" or "lead price". Combining price and volume data simply gives more information about order flow than price data alone. Maybe not more information, since everything is revealed in the price eventually, but more timely information.

 

I agree with you that volume does not lead price, but volume does create price. Volume is the effort and price is the result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:
Clearly, a relationship exists between both Price and Volume. Those who disagree simply have yet to see that which exists right in front of their nose. By understanding how all markets exhibit a fractal nature, one can take the first steps required to see the Price / Volume Relationship in action - irrespective of market and / or time frame used to trade.

 

For example, using the ES 5 minute chart, and only making decisions and taking action at the close of a 5 minute bar, the market provides crystal clear information as to where Price sits with respect to the Volume Sequences which require completion. By 'containing' Price within these Volume Sequences, the market reveals its trends across three seperate fractals each day - every day.

 

Volume leads Price.

 

Always.

 

- Spydertrader

 

Interesting spyder. How about some charts to illustrate the idea being presented here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  matinthehat said:
I agree with you that volume does not lead price, but volume does create price. Volume is the effort and price is the result.

 

 

People create price through agreement.

 

Price is the amount of goods or money given in exchange for something else.

 

Price can rise on falling volume.

 

Price can rise on rising volume.

 

Price can hold steady on falling volume.

 

Price can hold steady on rising volume.

 

Price can fall on falling volume.

 

Price can fall on rising volume.

 

The question for the speculator is simply "is price rising, falling, or holding steady?"

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Interesting spyder. How about some charts to illustrate the idea being presented here?

 

Sure thing. Let's start by taking a look at today's (6-22) S & P 500 E-Mini (The ES) using a five minute chart. Thinking fractally, we want to locate the Volume Sequences which the market displays all day, every day in every market. By describing these Volume Sequences using Volume Color (Black for Up and Red for Down), a trader should expect to see R 2 R 2 B 2 R (for a down trend) and B 2 B 2 R 2 B for an Up Trend. Again, thinking fractally, the market should provide these sequences on each and every trading fractal.

 

An example of a very fast fractal:

 

11635d1245729253-open-free-discussion-volume-fractal1.jpg

 

An example of a slightly less fast fractal:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11636&stc=1&d=1245729260

 

An example of a slow fractal:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11637&stc=1&d=1245729260

 

An example of the slowest fractal:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11638&stc=1&d=1245729260

 

 

As you can see, irrespective of the chosen fractal, the market provides the same exact sequences. Combine these fractals, and a trader can 'see' that which must complete.

 

Learning to thoroughly and properly 'contain' Price and Volume in order to more easily see these sequences represents the first step toward profitability.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

fractal1.thumb.jpg.9cb95ecb432fa2e61791cba4682fb924.jpg

fractal2.thumb.jpg.d372d719129a7a157324b3efe097ec91.jpg

fractal3.thumb.jpg.2a40be7cef5c691d493e0933454b2082.jpg

fractal4.thumb.jpg.f48b6150888a8fc02dee01916f408844.jpg

Edited by Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:

As you can see, irrespective of the chosen fractal, the market provides the same exact sequences. Combine these fractals, and a trader can 'see' that which must complete.

 

Learning to thoroughly and properly 'contain' Price and Volume in order to more easily see these sequences represents the first step toward profitability.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

I can't see any relationship between your lines/labels and the height of the volume bars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:
Learning to thoroughly and properly 'contain' Price and Volume in order to more easily see these sequences represents the first step toward profitability.

 

HTH.

 

- Spydertrader

 

Hi there,

 

I have never learned "to thoroughly and properly 'contain' Price and Volume" in the manner you present here.

 

Also, in the interest of full disclosure: I have learned to become immediately suspicious whenever anyone presents a "method" interpreting any indicator other than price as "the first step to profitability."

 

I would bet, that in most cases, a reader of this thread, trying to do so as you recommend, would experience not "the first step toward profitability" but merely another step down the road of frustration and failure.

 

I have attached a copy of yesterday's ES 5 minute chart to illustrate how I view yesterday's price action. Price is its own indicator, and it is in need of no additional, ancillary, and derivitive confirmation. Nothing other than what presents itself on the chartt throughout the day is necessary to trade profitably. Of course, price action is free.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70eef072aa_6-22-2009ES1.thumb.jpg.b165fd06b587743ba077c04f33e6f0fd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:

 

I have attached a copy of yesterday's ES 5 minute chart to illustrate how I view yesterday's price action. Price is its own indicator, and it is in need of no additional, ancillary, and derivitive confirmation. Nothing other than what presents itself on the chartt throughout the day is necessary to trade profitably. Of course, price action is free.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

OTOH, volume can be helpful. Matinthehat understands this stuff as well as anybody and better than most. I suggest that those who are interested look up his old posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  euclid said:
I can't see any relationship between your lines/labels and the height of the volume bars.

 

"Height of Volume Bars" represents only one possible relationship shown on the chart with Respect to the Volume Bars. By first understanding the fractal nature of the market, and then, applying that understanding onto one's chart, the trader can readily see the same sequences repeat - over and over again.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thalestrader said:
I have attached a copy of yesterday's ES 5 minute chart to illustrate how I view yesterday's price action. Price is its own indicator, and it is in need of no additional, ancillary, and derivitive confirmation. Nothing other than what presents itself on the chartt throughout the day is necessary to trade profitably. Of course, price action is free.

 

First off, no need to apply any sort of 'Gap Rule' to the open. Gaps do not exist. Simply 'mentally' slide the market open to the prior day close, and the market sequences continue where they ended.

 

Second, without Volume, Price does not exist. In other words, unless and until a trade takes place, Price doesn't hit the tape. That trade represents Volume.

 

In addition, the sequences of Volume must complete before the current trend (measured on whatever fractal one desires) reaches completion.

 

Hence, Volume leads Price. Always.

 

- Spydertrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:
First off, no need to apply any sort of 'Gap Rule' to the open. Gaps do not exist.

Simply 'mentally' slide the market open to the prior day close, and the market sequences continue where they ended...

- Spydertrader

 

 

for the EasyLanguage users, you are in luck...

 

there is no need to 'mentally' slide the market open to the prior day close...

 

you can do it with the sHiFt indicator:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f46/shifted-5949.html

 

11270d1244641668-shifted-2009-06-10_shifted.gif

31.11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Thales's example i see a weakening down-trend. The first sideways movement (indicated by '1') is either shorts covering and new longs entering (high volume) or a lack of buying and selling interest (low volume). Price then declines out of this first box indicating that there is a lack of support (low volume) or a strong new selling interest (rising volume). Most likely there is a lack of support as more shorts wait to see what will happen before they cover. Also, most likely the downward movement out of the first box was on weak volume as the old shorts would have covered if they saw that there was weak selling interest to the downside, which is most likely what they did as price rose quickly off of those new lows. As price goes into the second sideways movement (indicated by '2') either shorts are covering ((high volume) which is most likely the case as the end of the trading session is nearing + price does not look very promising to the donwside) or there once again is a lack of buying and selling interest ((low volume) which is most unlikely). As price hits the red line we see a decline in price and then another test of this line and a failure to breach. Now this is most likely because of a fight between the short coverings + new bulls and the new shorts (high volume). As the new bulls see how long the bears have been in power and the small amount of time left before the day's close, they would most likely sell out of their positions and allow the bears to take price down as much as they can before they to are forced to cover.

 

Feel free to add and correct. I do not like to analyse charts in this fashion as i am not a strong communicator.

price.jpg.80313a2f44702e860511300368ba07bc.jpg

Edited by matinthehat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not understand your chart, then do not do anything based on it. Noone can understand every single little movement in the markets, so there is no point in trying to. When you find something that truly makes sense to you, then you should have the confidence to act on it. If you lack this confidence then you should not trade until you have it. This might be a little off-track, but i believe Brownsfan's meaning of this thread was to spark an insightful discussion, and no intelligence is being gained by everyone stating the same thing over and over again (not to step on any toes).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Spydertrader said:
First off, no need to apply any sort of 'Gap Rule' to the open. Gaps do not exist. Simply 'mentally' slide the market open to the prior day close, and the market sequences continue where they ended.

 

Gaps are very real, and are themselves a form of impulse that represents at least a tempoary imbalence between buyers and sellers. You can "mentally slide the market" all you want, but doing so chooses to erase an important piece of information that may be used to make trading decisions.

 

 

  Spydertrader said:
Second, without Volume, Price does not exist. In other words, unless and until a trade takes place, Price doesn't hit the tape. That trade represents Volume.

 

Without people agreeing to an exchange of something of value for something else of value, there is no price, because there is no exchange. Volume measures units of goods, not people, i.e. not participants. Volume and price are two measures that come out of the observable data of a transaction. Without price having been agreed to, there would be no transaction, hence no volume to measure.

 

In other words, the transaction is primary to both price and volume, and price is primary to volume.

 

You are playing the sophist.

 

  Spydertrader said:
In addition, the sequences of Volume must complete before the current trend (measured on whatever fractal one desires) reaches completion.

 

Hence, Volume leads Price. Always.

 

- Spydertrader

 

And again, this last statement has the character of an assertion, not a proof. If you can prove it (without resorting to tautology) please do so.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
OTOH, volume can be helpful. Matinthehat understands this stuff as well as anybody and better than most. I suggest that those who are interested look up his old posts.

 

I agree that volume can provide useful information at times.

 

I am primarily interested here in the assertion that volume is primary to and somehow trumps price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.